Originally posted by quanchi112
Cap 3 isn't an avengers movie just like Superman won't be a Jla movie on his solo adventures after the fact.You need to calm down.
They picked the date and then pussed out. Weak. Stupid.
Yes it is. It's part of the Avengers shared universe, and part of the franchise.
lol, funny. You're the one getting all angry about Superman possibly being a box office success.
Call it what you want. I'm sure all those extra dollars will comfort them.
Originally posted by quanchi112
That isn't all of the avengers nor the most popular ones.
Actually Cap is the biggest Icon on the Avengers.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Avengers did increase the popularity of the characters but it doesn't give every marvel property a guaranteed blockbuster.
It makes every movie starring an Avenger a guaranteed blockbuster.
Much more so than a character being an "Icon" Lol. No one cares about that anymore.
Originally posted by quanchi112
So you agree with me in the end.
That all the Solo Avenger movies have a massive box office advantage due to the success and popularity of the Avengers? Yeah of course they do.
Originally posted by -Pr-It is a cap movie. Ironman, Thor, Hulk are nowhere to be found.
Yes it is. It's part of the Avengers shared universe, and part of the franchise.lol, funny. You're the one getting all angry about Superman possibly being a box office success.
Call it what you want. I'm sure all those extra dollars will comfort them.
Not at all. They will make money on the film but were stupid to set it on the same date of a marvel movie only to back down and look even dumber.
Dc cowered to mighty Marvel.
😄
Originally posted by DARTH POWERHe isn't anywhere near the most popular and that is why I said, dummy.
Actually Cap is the biggest Icon on the Avengers.It makes every movie starring an Avenger a guaranteed blockbuster.
Much more so than a character being an "Icon" Lol. No one cares about that anymore.
That all the Solo Avenger movies have a massive box office advantage due to the success and popularity of the Avengers? Yeah of course they do.
Ironman, Hulk shit on him.
No, it doesn't. It makes them a likely success but not a sure thing.
People care about great movies and the reason man of steel underperformed is because it sucked.
Read what I say and try to comprehend it for a change. K. Thanks.
Originally posted by quanchi112
He isn't anywhere near the most popular and that is why I said, dummy.
Most Popular? Wtf? I said Most ICONIC.
LOL So let me get this straight... You've been throwing around this "Superman is an Icon" line to big up Marvel's success against WB/DC's. And yet you don't even know what an Icon is?
HAHAHA You're such a dumb ass troll!
Let me explain it to you. An Icon is a Symbol, a person or thing who represents something. In the case of Marvel comics, Captain America represents the Leader of all the Superheroes. Just like Superman does in DC Comics.
Where popularity changes from time to time, an Iconic status tends to be much longer lived in status.
And btw Cap's also just proven himself to also be the 2nd Most Popular Avenger after IM. So as far as the MCU goes IM and Cap are it's 2 Icons AND also happen to be the 2 most popular superheroes in the MCU as of now.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Ironman, Hulk shit on him.
You might want to re-check the box office figures for the last Hulk film. Hulk is the one whose been shat on.
Originally posted by quanchi112
No, it doesn't. It makes them a likely success but not a sure thing.
Clearly it's a sure thing. As proven by the Ultra Mega box office success of the crap that was IM3. Simply because IM was the star and poster boy of the Avengers. Cap 2 was a far better film. Heck Thor 2 was better, but neither came close to IM3's box office.
Originally posted by quanchi112
People care about great movies and the reason man of steel underperformed is because it sucked.
Man of Steel Underperformed? LOL What planet are you living on? Superman Returns underperformed which is why it got the reboot. The Incredible Hulk by Marvel studios BADLY Underperformed which is why they've never attempted another Hulk movie, despite how famous and well recognized that character is.
MOS lead straight to the announcement of Batman V Superman with Superman being the MOS Superman. Proving without a doubt MOS Performed.
(Of course that should have been obvious to anyone with an ounce of common sense considering it almost tripled it's budget, made back most it's marketing costs with sponsorships and the fact that there was no guarantee of it performing after the bad taste Superman Returns left).
Originally posted by quanchi112
Read what I say and try to comprehend it for a change. K. Thanks.
LOL Says the guy who uses words for which he has Zero clue to the meaning 😆
Originally posted by DARTH POWERYes, I understood that and I repeat popularity doesn't mean popularity, dummy. You admit Iron Man is more popular thereby defeating your earlier point yourself, dummy. Cap isn't a worldwide icon either. Quit embarrassing yourself.
Most Popular? Wtf? I said Most ICONIC.LOL So let me get this straight... You've been throwing around this "Superman is an Icon" line to big up Marvel's success against WB/DC's. And yet you don't even know what an Icon is?
HAHAHA You're such a dumb ass troll!
Let me explain it to you. An Icon is a Symbol, a person or thing who represents something. In the case of Marvel comics, Captain America represents the Leader of all the Superheroes. Just like Superman does in DC Comics.
Where popularity changes from time to time, an Iconic status tends to be much longer lived in status.
And btw Cap's also just proven himself to also be the 2nd Most Popular Avenger after IM. So as far as the MCU goes IM and Cap are it's 2 Icons AND also happen to be the 2 most popular superheroes in the MCU as of now.
You might want to re-check the box office figures for the last Hulk film. Hulk is the one whose been shat on.
Clearly it's a sure thing. As proven by the Ultra Mega box office success of the crap that was IM3. Simply because IM was the star and poster boy of the Avengers. Cap 2 was a far better film. Heck Thor 2 was better, but neither came close to IM3's box office.
Man of Steel Underperformed? LOL What planet are you living on? Superman Returns underperformed which is why it got the reboot. The Incredible Hulk by Marvel studios BADLY Underperformed which is why they've never attempted another Hulk movie, despite how famous and well recognized that character is.
MOS lead straight to the announcement of Batman V Superman with Superman being the MOS Superman. Proving without a doubt MOS Performed.
(Of course that should have been obvious to anyone with an ounce of common sense considering it almost tripled it's budget, made back most it's marketing costs with sponsorships and the fact that there was no guarantee of it performing after the bad taste Superman Returns left).
LOL Says the guy who uses words for which he has Zero clue to the meaning 😆
In terms of popularity not box office appeal.
People love Tony stark so they seem to forgive a horrible film IMO as they have a love for the character.
It underperformed. Failed to live up to expectations but still made a profit just below.
Irony.
I think the fact that DC has more famous characters is what's actually hurting them. When the Mandarin's character got butchered in IM3, I recall many film reviewers saying they didn't mind it because they were not familiar with the character. Same with GoTG, where Gamora and many others are vastly underpowered compared to her comic book counterparts, and nobody in the audience really cares because the movie is fun.
But when Supes does something OOC like fight Zod in a populated area, people get up in arms because it defies what they know about the character. Marvel has more leeway to alter their characters to make the story more interesting, whereas DC's big names, such as Supes, Bats, WW, etc. must keep their characters static to the comics, which restricts the amount of plots they can use.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Yes, I understood that and I repeat popularity doesn't mean popularity, dummy.
What are talking about now?
It would help if you quote me paragraph by paragraph like I do you. Or have you not figured out how to do that yet after years of Trolling these boards?
Originally posted by quanchi112
You admit Iron Man is more popular thereby defeating your earlier point yourself, dummy.
Which point? Quote me paragraph to paragraph because you're not making any sense.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Cap isn't a worldwide icon either. Quit embarrassing yourself.
😆
You're a disgrace to all Marvel fans everywhere.
Cap's not an Iconic worldwide known superhero? Seriously you're the one embarrassing yourself. Just like you did when you ran away from my Obi-Wan vs Khan challenge 😆
Originally posted by quanchi112
In terms of popularity not box office appeal.
And what stats have you got for this claim?
Box office is the only Objective stat we have to go by for Popularity. And it's a pretty good one.
IM makes the most box office dollars of all the Avengers because he's by far the most popular.
Originally posted by quanchi112
People love Tony stark so they seem to forgive a horrible film IMO as they have a love for the character.
You've just proven my last point.
Originally posted by quanchi112
It underperformed. Failed to live up to expectations but still made a profit just below.
What expectations? Bring proof of your claim. I've got proof of it's success through figures, the franchise's history, and the next month's announcement of Batman V Superman.
Bring your proof of your claim or I'll accept your concession.
Originally posted by quanchi112
It is a cap movie. Ironman, Thor, Hulk are nowhere to be found.Not at all. They will make money on the film but were stupid to set it on the same date of a marvel movie only to back down and look even dumber.
Dc cowered to mighty Marvel.
😄
We both know that's not what I meant, but if you want to keep up your lies, that's fine.
Dumb for making more money? Don't see how. They picked the wrong date to start, but they fixed their mistake.
No it didn't. I know you really want that to be true, but it isn't.
Originally posted by DARTH POWERYou are taking. Y words out of context. What they predicated it would make, dummy.
What are talking about now?It would help if you quote me paragraph by paragraph like I do you. Or have you not figured out how to do that yet after years of Trolling these boards?
Which point? Quote me paragraph to paragraph because you're not making any sense.
😆
You're a disgrace to all Marvel fans everywhere.
Cap's not an Iconic worldwide known superhero? Seriously you're the one embarrassing yourself. Just like you did when you ran away from my Obi-Wan vs Khan challenge 😆
And what stats have you got for this claim?
Box office is the only Objective stat we have to go by for Popularity. And it's a pretty good one.
IM makes the most box office dollars of all the Avengers because he's by far the most popular.
You've just proven my last point.
What expectations? Bring proof of your claim. I've got proof of it's success through figures, the franchise's history, and the next month's announcement of Batman V Superman.
Bring your proof of your claim or I'll accept your concession.
Cap isn't the most popular.
Get mad that dc backed down.
Originally posted by -Pr-You said it now want to backpedal. I'm great at what I do.
We both know that's not what I meant, but if you want to keep up your lies, that's fine.Dumb for making more money? Don't see how. They picked the wrong date to start, but they fixed their mistake.
No it didn't. I know you really want that to be true, but it isn't.
Dumb for picking a date to clash with marvel. They should have picked this date to begin with. Now everyone waited to see who'd back down first and it was dc which makes them look weak.
Originally posted by quanchi112
You said it now want to backpedal. I'm great at what I do.Dumb for picking a date to clash with marvel. They should have picked this date to begin with. Now everyone waited to see who'd back down first and it was dc which makes them look weak.
I haven't backpedalled at all. You're just trying to twist my words, as usual. lol @ you being great though. At what? Flip-flopping? Bandwagoning? Maybe.
I don't see how it makes them look weak at all. Especially seeing as it's WB, not DC. WB are years behind in creating a shared universe. They aren't competing with Disney, nor are Disney competing with them. They're in no position to. They made a blunder, and they owned up to it, and now plan to make substantial profits. Sounds like they fixed their mistake.
Originally posted by -Pr-Debating. One minute you're an xmen fan but in reality you adore Superman. I am not fooled.
I haven't backpedalled at all. You're just trying to twist my words, as usual. lol @ you being great though. At what? Flip-flopping? Bandwagoning? Maybe.I don't see how it makes them look weak at all. Especially seeing as it's WB, not DC. WB are years behind in creating a shared universe. They aren't competing with Disney, nor are Disney competing with them. They're in no position to. They made a blunder, and they owned up to it, and now plan to make substantial profits. Sounds like they fixed their mistake.
Backing down is looking weak and I gave other links to other sites reporting the same. They were foolish and backed down.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Debating. One minute you're an xmen fan but in reality you adore Superman. I am not fooled.Backing down is looking weak and I gave other links to other sites reporting the same. They were foolish and backed down.
Sure. When you have to lie to try to help your cause, you're already in a weakened position, and you do it often. At least I'm honest about my likes and dislikes.
Even if it did make them look weak, I doubt they care. The movie will make more money. How is that a bad decision?
Originally posted by -Pr-I am one of the only few honest ones here.
Sure. When you have to lie to try to help your cause, you're already in a weakened position, and you do it often. At least I'm honest about my likes and dislikes.Even if it did make them look weak, I doubt they care. The movie will make more money. How is that a bad decision?
That is even worse if they don't care how they are perceived. Beta males.
Originally posted by quanchi112
They are a company of betas who picked a fight and then backed down when they didn't need to pick a fight in the first place.
I agree Beta Males try to pick up fights with real Alphas and they back down
In order to not look bad they made up a bunch of sh1t in an effort trying to disguise their lack of GUTS 👆