ISIS Terrorists Behead American Journalist

Started by Robtard8 pages

Originally posted by Mindset
I'm pretty sure it allows you to buttphuck men and goats.

The internet wouldn't lie to me.

You're only allowed to butt-pump other men if it's for Jihad purposes. ie the "Anal Jihad".

YouTube video

Originally posted by Star428
Pointless? LOL. Ok, whatever you say. You said we should do nothing. I disagreed and said airstrike intensity should be increased. But, since you in your all wiseness declared it "pointless" I guess that makes it so. 🙄
Where did I say we should stop our airstrikes? I said there's nothing more to do. We're already bombing them and arming local militia- that's good enough.

The answer is HAARP.

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
The answer is HAARP.

Again, you have to have the enemy all in one place, like a country, for that to work.

Airstrikes are not a long term solution. ISIS will continue to kill Americans regardless of what we do. We can't really fight a conventional war with these guerillas, so American boots on the ground will end up costing more
American lives. ISIS has threatened to bring the bloodshed inside our own borders, so we can't ignore them.

I think we need to worry about protecting our own borders right now, no only to prevent further ISIS terrorrists from coming in, but to contain the influx of illegal aliens from Latin America. Obama is not the man to handle this, but I digress.

Originally posted by Tattoos N Scars
Airstrikes are not a long term solution. ISIS will continue to kill Americans regardless of what we do. We can't really fight a conventional war with these guerillas, so American boots on the ground will end up costing more
American lives. ISIS has threatened to bring the bloodshed inside our own borders, so we can't ignore them.

I think we need to worry about protecting our own borders right now, no only to prevent further ISIS terrorrists from coming in, but to contain the influx of illegal aliens from Latin America. Obama is not the man to handle this, but I digress.

"to prevent further ISIS terrorists from coming in"

WTF are you talking about?

Originally posted by Lord Lucien
"to prevent further ISIS terrorists from coming in"

WTF are you talking about?

I'm pretty sure ISIS have guys here already

Do you know?

Originally posted by Lord Lucien
Do you know?

I think they were trying to tell us that, or make us believe that, because of the British accent of the executioner.

ISIS press officer who said jihadists would 'raise the flag of Allah in the White House' reported dead in Syria airstrike.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2730929/ISIS-press-officer-said-jihadists-raise-flag-Allah-White-House-reported-dead-Syria-airstrike.html

I just saw the beheading video of Steven Sotloff.

It's sad that Obama (or rather the US government in general) will never listen to his dying plea.

This acts of terrorism will never end, all because of the US sticking it's nose on other countries' affairs + births of soon-to-be Islamic extremists.

Originally posted by AsbestosFlaygon
I just saw the beheading video of Steven Sotloff.

It's sad that Obama (or rather the US government in general) will never listen to his dying plea.

This acts of terrorism will never end, all because of the US sticking it's nose on other countries' affairs + births of soon-to-be Islamic extremists.


You think that anything he said was of his own choice? Do you understand the meaning of the word 'duress?'

Also, there's not a damn person outside of ISIS itself who wasn't calling for or at least tolerant of the US airstrikes against ISIS. Even Iran was relieved when the bombs started falling.

It isn't really "interfering" in another country's affairs if that country's government asked for the intervention.

Why did America intervene in Ukraine and Iraq?
Obviously, it's for economic reasons. Nothing else.

America doesn't give 2 shits about Folley, Sorloff, or any victims of their so-called wars.

PS: I'm on neither's side, but US should stop colonizing other countries for their financial gain.
Workout their trade routes, explore other resources for profit, etc.
That's where the gov't should be spending their revenue on, not on bio-chemical weapons testing on Fallujah.

Originally posted by AsbestosFlaygon
I just saw the beheading video of Steven Sotloff.

It's sad that Obama (or rather the US government in general) will never listen to his dying plea.

This acts of terrorism will never end, all because of the US sticking it's nose on other countries' affairs + births of soon-to-be Islamic extremists.

I won't watch death vids, but what was the guy's "dying plea"?

Originally posted by AsbestosFlaygon
I just saw the beheading video of Steven Sotloff.

It's sad that Obama (or rather the US government in general) will never listen to his dying plea.

This acts of terrorism will never end, all because of the US sticking it's nose on other countries' affairs + births of soon-to-be Islamic extremists.

Damn right, he can't even get the name of ISIS correct. He's such a dumbass.

YouTube video

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
Damn right, he can't even get the name of ISIS correct. He's such a dumbass.[/youtube]
Originally posted by Robtard

But this is the man who keeps blaming everything on Bush, and Bush hasn't been president for 6 years.

The Democrats are some of the biggest haters I have ever met. Just remember some of the very nasty things said about Bush.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
But this is the man who keeps blaming everything on Bush, and Bush hasn't been president for 6 years.

The Democrats are some of the biggest haters I have ever met. Just remember some of the very nasty things said about Bush.

If you don't think Bush's war has lasting impacts that we still see (and will see for coming years), then you're blind.

Such as?

On a side note, I do beleive the Republican party is (or at least was) craftier than the Democratic. I still think they sandbagged McCain in 2008 by giving him that impossibly stupid woman (no way she wasn't vetted) as a running mate so he couldn't win. Knowing that America was going to be a complete mess after Bush for years to come, it would be smarter to have a Dem President to take the flak.

Originally posted by Robtard
If you don't think Bush's war has lasting impacts that we still see (and will see for coming years), then you're blind.

Such as?

On a side note, I do beleive the Republican party is (or at least was) craftier than the Democratic. I still think they sandbagged McCain in 2008 by giving him that impossibly stupid woman (no way she wasn't vetted) as a running mate so he couldn't win. Knowing that America was going to be a complete mess after Bush for years to come, it would be smarter to have a Dem President to take the flak.

So it's okay for you to hate, but not people on the other side. They call that hypocrisy.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
So it's okay for you to hate, but not people on the other side. They call that hypocrisy.

Not sure how you got that from what I said. Hate on Obama all you like, he doesn't care.