ISIS Terrorists Behead American Journalist

Started by Omega Vision8 pages

Originally posted by AsbestosFlaygon
Why did America intervene in Ukraine and Iraq?
Obviously, it's for economic reasons. Nothing else.

America doesn't give 2 shits about Folley, Sorloff, or any victims of their so-called wars.

PS: I'm on neither's side, but US should stop colonizing other countries for their financial gain.
Workout their trade routes, explore other resources for profit, etc.
That's where the gov't should be spending their revenue on, not on bio-chemical weapons testing on Fallujah.


I would think that the people who actually beheaded the reporters deserve more of the blame and condemnation than the US government.

Calling Folley and Sorloff "victims" of "America's wars" is all kinds of stupid. Full stop. They're victims of bandits with a radical ideology who are trying to wage psychological warfare through acts of brutality.

Once again: but for ISIS themselves, no one in Iraq is sorry that America is getting involved with airstrikes. To stop those airstrikes just to save the life of one reporter (assuming it worked) would be pointless because it would have meant the deaths of hundreds of Kurds, Shi'ites, and members of religious minorities. Before American air power was brought to bear ISIS was slowly grinding down the Peshmerga, and the Iraqi Army was powerless to roll back their advances.

If America hadn't gotten involved, someone else would have, likely Iran, and no one wants to see a messy Iranian ground invasion of Iraq.

Originally posted by Robtard
Not sure how you got that from what I said. Hate on Obama all you like, he doesn't care.

That's not the point. Democrats have no right to call anything thing that other people say hate without being hypocrites. Democrats are the masters of hate. So the idea behind the poster is hypocritical and makes Obama look like a fool.

Not to mention that while in the past America (under a different POTUS) may have attempted imperialist power grabs for territorial resources, the intervention in the ISIS conflict is clearly one of humanitarian aid.

EDIT: this is a reply to OV

I'm noticing an increasing trend among a certain portion of the American public who are so tired of war and jaded that they've lost all sense of perspective and don't envision any scenario where it's justified for America to use military force abroad.

Right now America is doing the job it was supposedly doing in 2003. This is the time when it actually makes sense to get involved in Iraq.

America can't just invade a country and then wash its hands of the mess it makes just because the American public wants a clean break/cold turkey separation.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
That's not the point. Democrats have no right to call anything thing that other people say hate without being hypocrites.

Democrats are the masters of hate.

So the idea behind the poster is hypocritical and makes Obama look like a fool.

Well I disagree in the blanketed sense of things. Certain points, sure.

I disagree that Democrats are "the masters of hate".

I think that picture was just humor; it's the reason I posted it.

Originally posted by Robtard
Well I disagree in the blanketed sense of things. Certain points, sure.

I disagree that Democrats are "the masters of hate".

I think that picture was just humor; it's the reason I posted it.

I don't find it funny at all. Perhaps more golf will make me feel better. Now that's funny.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
I don't find it funny at all. Perhaps more golf will make me feel better. Now that's funny.

I'd not use golf jokes about Obama while being a staunch Bush supporter, it will backfire.

Originally posted by Robtard
I'd not use golf jokes about Obama while being a staunch Bush supporter, it will backfire.

I was never a Bush supporter. I was just never a Bush hater. I know that is hard for you to tell the difference.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
That's not the point. Democrats have no right to call anything thing that other people say hate without being hypocrites. Democrats are the masters of hate. So the idea behind the poster is hypocritical and makes Obama look like a fool.
I'm glad you've finally dropped the "I'm politic-neutral!" stance- it really wasn't fooling anybody.

Originally posted by Tzeentch
I'm glad you've finally dropped the "I'm politic-neutral!" stance- it really wasn't fooling anybody.

You don't even know what politic-neutral is. I'm talking to a Democrat. It's assumed that Republicans are masters of hate. Or can there be only one master of hate?

Quit teaming up on Shaky, he's my friend🙂

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
I was never a Bush supporter. I was just never a Bush hater. I know that is hard for you to tell the difference.

You voted for Bush but didn't support him? That is odd.

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
Quit teaming up on Shaky, he's my friend🙂

😆 I can handle the haters! 😉

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
You don't even know what politic-neutral is. I'm talking to a Democrat. It's assumed that Republicans are masters of hate. Or can there be only one master of hate?

If there is a political "Masters of Hate", it would probably be the religious far right. Those are some haters right there.

Originally posted by Robtard
You voted for Bush but didn't support him? That is odd.

Who would you know? I always vote for Alfred E Neuman.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
😆 I can handle the haters! 😉

Oh I know, you the man.

Originally posted by Robtard
If there is a political "Masters of Hate", it would probably be the religious far right. Those are some haters right there.

Really? Ya, they can be very hateful, but I've had atheists screaming at me. It is extremes that lead to hate.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
You don't even know what politic-neutral is. I'm talking to a Democrat. It's assumed that Republicans are masters of hate. Or can there be only one master of hate?
So you're basically a contrarian?

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Who would you know? I always vote for Alfred E Neuman.

Pretty sure you've said you did. Though I could be mixing it up and thinking of the time you said you'd be voting for McCain.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Really? Ya, they can be very hateful, but I've had atheists screaming at me. It is extremes that lead to hate.

So you think the Democratic (Masters of Hate) party are extremist. Odd.