Avengers: Infinity War

Started by Robtard119 pages

They only thing we've really seen for Captain Marvel is a few promo shots, yet here we are again having problems over the prosper that their might be a powerful female character and a strong female lead.

I don't have a problem with a strong female lead; I do have a general problem with cringey moral preaching from Hollywood writers that tend to suck at articulating coherent philosophy (Thanos's entire motivation was hilariously inept, for instance)

Originally posted by Robtard
They only thing we've really seen for Captain Marvel is a few promo shots, yet here we are again having problems over the prosper that their might be a powerful female character and a strong female lead.

You're jumping the gun, to be fair. It isn't the gender that's the problem; it's Marvel's insistence on pushing Carol Danvers as their Wonder Woman, which in the comics has been a trainwreck at best. People are naturally worried about that carrying over to the movies, though I honestly don't think there's too much of a danger.

Feige's comments about her being oh-so powerful would get zero to little pushback if he was talking about Wanda, for example.

Fair enough then on the comic-to-film scare/concern, it just seemed like more of the nonsense we had in the past like with Star Wars and its female characters/castings.

But I'm not worried at all. So far the MCU's casting/writing has varied from good to great. Downey as Tony. Evans as Steve. Hemsworth as Thor. Holland as Peter, who is by far the best of the three to play the character to date. The list goes on. I don't think they're going to wreck it now just to push some imaginary "SJW" or feminist agenda that's supposed to exist here.

When something's given you win after win in terms of casting and writing, I'm not going to assume the worse before we know next to nothing.

Originally posted by Robtard
They only thing we've really seen for Captain Marvel is a few promo shots, yet here we are again having problems over the prosper that their might be a powerful female character and a strong female lead.
Oh stop it with your virtue signaling. We don't have a problem with strong female characters. I love Wanda in IW and bringing in more female characters has only improved the MCU. That being said the trainwreck that is Carl Manvers in the comics is pure garbage. Her books sell like crap because people are tired of the SJW Marvel movement. It's the way she acts and the things she says. People don't like being preached to. Like what you're trying to do with your sjw virtue signaling.

Originally posted by CPT Space Bomb
Oh stop it with your virtue signaling. We don't have a problem with strong female characters. I live Wanda in IW and bringing in more female characters has only improved the MCU. That being said the trainwreck that is Carl Manvers in the comics is pure garbage. Her books sell like crap because people are tired of the SJW Marvel movement. It's the way she acts and the things she says. People don't like being preached to. Like what you're trying to do with your sjw virtue signaling.

All you really did is yell "SJW!!!" and the like a bunch of times.

robtard, do you seriously think the SJW agenda is "imaginary"?

Originally posted by The Ellimist
robtard, do you seriously think the SJW agenda is "imaginary"?
Pretty much, yeah. The studio isn't going to risk a multi-billion dollar franchise just to push some whatever imagined 'girls rule!' agenda. They're a business, they're doing something that works, they're going to continue on that path, cos $$$ > feelings to the board members and stock holders.

Originally posted by The Ellimist
robtard, do you seriously think the SJW agenda is "imaginary"?
Originally posted by Robtard
Pretty much, yeah. The studio isn't going to risk a multi-billion dollar franchise just to push some whatever imagined 'girls rule!' agenda. They're a business, they're doing something that works, they're going to continue on that path, cos $$$ > feelings to the board members and stock holders.

Originally posted by Robtard
Pretty much, yeah. The studio isn't going to risk a multi-billion dollar franchise just to push some whatever imagined 'girls rule!' agenda. They're a business, they're doing something that works, they're going to continue on that path, cos $$$ > feelings to the board members and stock holders.
Yes, "imagined"

and while this is Star Wars it is Disney. I HOPE that the MCU doesn't go the route of SW, but we'll see.

oh my god

Originally posted by CPT Space Bomb
Yes, "imagined"

and while this is Star Wars it is Disney. I HOPE that the MCU doesn't go the route of SW, but we'll see.

A picture of four girls/women with tee-shirts is your proof and reason for concern? I admit, I laughed.

Originally posted by Robtard
A picture of four women with tee-shirts is your proof? I admit, I laughed.
Um, you realize the Third woman Is Kathleen Kennedy, the HEAD OF STAR WARS atm.. right?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kathleen_Kennedy_(producer)

Originally posted by CPT Space Bomb
Um, you realize the Third woman Is Kathleen Kennedy, the HEAD OF STAR WARS atm.. right?

Yes, and???

Imagine a world where the lead of a franchise can go from being a man to a woman at a turning point and it's just because the writing worked and there wasn't some 'SJW-Feminist' agenda to put men down. Imagine.

Originally posted by Robtard
Yes, and???

Imagine a world where the lead of a franchise can go from being a man to a woman at a turning point and it's just because the writing worked and there wasn't some 'SJW-Feminist' agenda to put men down. Imagine.

I have no problem with the fact she's a woman. Why is the force female? The force is the ****ING FORCE. Femenist agendas are clear in SW now and to deny it makes you look more foolish than your virtue signalling.

Originally posted by CPT Space Bomb
I have no problem with the fact she's a woman you idiot. Why is the force female? The force is the ****ING FORCE.

Femenist agendas are clear in SW now and to deny it makes you look more foolish than your virtue signalling.

Your anger here is very amusing. It's just a tee-shirt though, she was prolly just having fun with her family/friends.

Not really, that's just your (emotional) micro-penis causing you to think that because *gasp* Rey's a strong female lead and she can beat up boys. You'd enjoy the films if you just sat back and didn't see "SJW!" and "Der Feminist!" in everything.

Problem with Rey isnt her being female. Its her spitting on the previous Jedi lore of having to actually train and progress as a character before defeating all powerful opponents.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Problem with Rey isnt her being female. Its her spitting on the previous Jedi lore of having to actually train and progress as a character before defeating all powerful opponents.
There's no indication that was done just because Rey was cast/written as a women though. Is there?

A man could just as easily been cast and the same could have been done; would it have garnered the same level of hate or would people have accepted it as 'this character must be very powerful to have that much raw ability'?

I know this movie is not that interesting but please stay on topic. Cheers

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Problem with Rey isnt her being female. Its her spitting on the previous Jedi lore of having to actually train and progress as a character before defeating all powerful opponents.
No Thor, it's clearly because we're male misogynists. Meh, I'm done arguing with Rob"really is a tard" . He doesn't listen to legit criticisms but only virtue signals because that's the only way he can defend his point. Anyway, THE MCU has been so much better than Star Wars in that regard it's not even close. Hopefully it stays that way.