Hulk vs Sinestro

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
So I'm allowed to bring up She Hulk against energy wielders, just 'as an example', right?

Again, moot as Sinestro has Parallax. Its like me asking you for Doc Green against energy drainers....and then bringing up She hulk vs Silver Surfer or something. You'd be throwing a fit.

But I see that you're just going to ignore his showings against a planet buster, a universal reality warper...because he's in a Lantern book, and is a Lantern type enemy. Lol. At least you have moves your phrasing on from asking for strength feats from said reality warper. Maybe you should make a Batman vs the Presence thread, as the Presence has fewer feats.

Shall I limit you to not using any showings from the Hulk books?

Star brand waved him away with a gesture. Sinestro does the same.

You are clearly misunderstanding me. I'm not comparing the two...GLS and Sinestro. Reread my post.

Originally posted by carver9
I'm using them as examples. The examples was, GLs does amazing against one another like Hulk's does good against each other, Supers, etc... it's when they face beings that doesn't possess the same powers they have, thats when things change. When we get a perspective of how a fight would go between Hulk vs someone with versatility, or Sinestro vs a physical power house, or Superman vs an energy drainer. This is what i am asking you for. Don't get why you can't grasp this.

READ. Lanterns does well against each other. Hulk's does well against each other. Supermen does well against each other. It's when they fight characters of DIFFERENT power is when we get a grasp on their actual power level. Hulk does good against Super Bricks but falls short against energy drainers. Superman does good against energy wielders but falls short against high versatility (red son radiation, kryptonite conjurers).

Do you not understand this (lol)? That's why I'm asking you, outside (how many times do I have to repeat this) of fighting OTHER LANTERNS, who has Sinestro defeated? Can you not grasp the concept of my question? Good god!!!

Originally posted by -K-M-
So Hal Jordan or Kyle rayner feats when possessed by parallax are fair game for sinestro as well?

SMH. Stop skimming over my posts. Read it.

Originally posted by carver9
SMH. Stop skimming over my posts. Read it.

Their idiotic and full of faulty logic. You don't seem to get base sinestro is different then parallax sinestro. Your examples are moronic and serve no basis nor do they even apply to current sinestro.

I get the feeling that Carver says no one understands him or the scans they read, but its quiet the opposite. No one understands carver or how he comes to his faulty logic and tried go convince that this is truth.

Originally posted by -K-M-
Their idiotic and full of faulty logic. You don't seem to get base sinestro is different then parallax sinestro. Your examples are moronic and serve no basis nor do they even apply to current sinestro.

What's 'current' Sinestro fts?

Originally posted by carver9
What's 'current' Sinestro fts?

Haha noooo you see, now you get to have a little taste of 'Hulk logic'.

You see, Sinestro has had an upgrade. He now has the fear entity inside him (which, btw, has never been retconned as being weaker than when it infected Hal etc).

THEREFORE, all of his low feats are inapplicable.

HOWEVER, all of his high end feats are applicable. If he was able to do them when at 'base', he can surely now do them at upgraded levels.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Haha noooo you see, now you get to have a little taste of 'Hulk logic'.

You see, Sinestro has had an upgrade. He now has the fear entity inside him (which, btw, has never been retconned as being weaker than when it infected Hal etc).

THEREFORE, all of his low feats are inapplicable.

HOWEVER, all of his high end feats are applicable. If he was able to do them when at 'base', he can surely now do them at upgraded levels.

Sooooooo, with this entity inside of him, what fts does he have?

Originally posted by carver9
Sooooooo, with this entity inside of him, what fts does he have?

Would you also like to be shown feats of Parallax?

Sinestrollax is capable of installing great fear. Hulk is scared of many things the void comes to mind. Sinestrollax will make the hulk scared. His power will be reduced due to instead of anger he'll be afraid.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Would you also like to be shown feats of Parallax?

No. Fts of Sinestro with it.

Originally posted by carver9
No. Fts of Sinestro with it.

Why not Parallax? It's the same, isn't it?

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Why not Parallax? It's the same, isn't it?

I guess. I just want to see how he use it 'in character'.

We all can agree sinestrollax wins. He has 10000000+ ways to beat hulk. Hulk has one and this is not a boxing match, so his punchers chance dont fly. Hulk loses 10-10

It's too early to say what Sinestro can do, until we see the actual limits of his Pharallax, is only reasonable to assume he beats Hulk for a healthy majority.

Originally posted by Bentley
It's too early to say what Sinestro can do, until we see the actual limits of his Pharallax, is only reasonable to assume he beats Hulk for a healthy majority.

😐

Originally posted by Bentley
It's too early to say what Sinestro can do, until we see the actual limits of his Pharallax, is only reasonable to assume he beats Hulk for a healthy majority.

👆

Originally posted by carver9
😐

Sinestro is pretty versatile without any upgrades, if Hulk actually stood head and shoulders above him you could argue otherwise. Time might prove Sinestro can't really make the most of Pharallax, but we're not going to downgrade two established characters until we actually get some proof.

We discussed about gamma infused Thor some other day remember? Before the character acted, it was only reasonable to assume he'd punk most heralds without any issue and people who dismissed the amalgam were just wishful thinkers trying to save face. It's essentially the same here.

In either case early conclusions like this are pretty empty of meaning and shouldn't be given too much weight. In a week or two they can be entirely disproven.

Originally posted by Bentley
Sinestro is pretty versatile without any upgrades, if Hulk actually stood head and shoulders above him you could argue otherwise. Time might prove Sinestro can't really make the most of Pharallax, but we're not going to downgrade two established characters until we actually get some proof.

We discussed about gamma infused Thor some other day remember? Before the character acted, it was only reasonable to assume he'd punk most heralds without any issue and people who dismissed the amalgam were just wishful thinkers trying to save face. It's essentially the same here.

In either case early conclusions like this are pretty empty of meaning and shouldn't be given too much weight. In a week or two they can be entirely disproven.

But you do need fts instead of assumptions though. I'm not going to assume a character can beat another character without any fts, especially when it comes to a character like Hulk who can do anything.

I voted for Gamma powered Thor because he does have fts and I posted them in the thread he was in. He was easily operating in trans tier. Is this thread about current versions?

Originally posted by carver9
But you do need fts instead of assumptions though. I'm not going to assume a character can beat another character without any fts, especially when it comes to a character like Hulk who can do anything.

Sinestro has many great feats and so does Pharallax. We've seen Lanterns weilding entities before. Considering the lack of feats, we have a rather big amount of elements to make a discussion.

Would arguing with feats be better? Of course, I said as much in my post. But if Sinestro were to lose his entity in two books, without any extensive feats so to speak we could still extrapolate a lot of his power out of what we know of the entity and Sinestro. Then you'd sound biased as hell if you just said "he has no feats, hence he can only be considered as powerful as regular Sinestro". But you could still do it by claiming there is no proof, but you'd know then, there is no possible proof.

The current state is similar, but we have a much more healthy option of waiting and seeing. There is nothing irrational about trying to gauge an amalgam without feats in hand, it's just not as sound of a discussion.