Originally posted by juggerman
It could have just as easily been an editing error
exactly and the so called "blood" could be as well. which is why its inconckusive and should be disregarded......... if the editors wanted bills to be damaged from vegeta wed see it more definely and there wouldnt be an arguement over whether or not vegeta hurt him.
Originally posted by yungz22
exactly and the so called "blood" could be as well. which is why its inconckusive and should be disregarded......... if the editors wanted bills to be damaged from vegeta wed see it more definely and there wouldnt be an arguement over whether or not vegeta hurt him.
No. The blood was there and cannot be disregarded. The reason behind why there was no visible is speculation.
EDIT: You can't disregard something that happens on screen because "it might have been a mistake". That is foolish and opens a can of worms where everyone can disregard things they don't like because it's possible a mistake could have been made.
Originally posted by juggerman
No. The blood was there and cannot be disregarded. The reason behind why there was no visible is speculation.EDIT: You can't disregard something that happens on screen because "it might have been a mistake". That is foolish and opens a can of worms where everyone can disregard things they don't like because it's possible a mistake could have been made.
your supposed to disregard because of its lack of consistency and logic not because of it might have been a mistake
Originally posted by yungz22
your supposed to disregard because of its lack of consistency and logic not because of it might have been a mistake
Not at all since a ton of consistency was thrown out of the window with the film. The graphics and fight scenes were different than they have been in the past. Going by your logic we should disregard the entire fight scene due to "lack of consistancy"
Unless you have evidence that there was a mistake, not just your opinion, then we cannot assume there was one.
Originally posted by juggerman
Not at all since a ton of consistency was thrown out of the window with the film. The graphics and fight scenes were different than they have been in the past. Going by your logic we should disregard the entire fight scene due to "lack of consistancy"Unless you have evidence that there was a mistake, not just your opinion, then we cannot assume there was one.
what fight is inconsistent?
Originally posted by yungz22
so according if some isnt bleeding because the animation style is different that neans they are still bleeding? wtf
Do you know what a strawman is? Anyway, in response to your idea that "since this was shown a certain way in the past it must be shown that way now" I give you a different style if animation. So clearly things, including the portrayal of characters bleeding, can be altered in time. Very simple.
Originally posted by juggerman
Do you know what a strawman is? Anyway, in response to your idea that "since this was shown a certain way in the past it must be shown that way now" I give you a different style if animation. So clearly things, including the portrayal of characters bleeding, can be altered in time. Very simple.
animation style doesnt have anything to do with events that occur within the story.... the more you talk the dumber you sound it appears logic and consistency are vague concepts to you
Originally posted by yungz22
animation style doesnt have anything to do with events that occur within the story.... the more you talk the dumber you sound it appears logic and consistency are vague concepts to you
You can say whatever you want but the fact remains blood was drawn from Beerus by Vegeta. No matter how much you cry, it won't change
Originally posted by juggerman
You can say whatever you want but the fact remains blood was drawn from Beerus by Vegeta. No matter how much you cry, it won't change
bills had zero damage after that assault so its possible the "blood" was an error... even tho since bills was 100% fine. its possible it wasnt even blood or if it was blood that it could be vegeta's..... see the questions inconsistency, logic and inconclusivness bring
Originally posted by yungz22
bills had zero damage after that assault so its possible the "blood" was an error... even tho since bills was 100% fine. its possible it wasnt even blood or if it was blood that it could be vegeta's..... see the questions inconsistency, logic and inconclusivness bring
It's also possible that's exactly what was intended.
If it wasn't blood what was it?
Prove it was Vegeta's.
All you are throwing out are random "what ifs" with zero evidence to support it. It doesn't take much to see it was indeed blood and it was indeed Beerus'. You're grasping at straws