Originally posted by Robtard
While I'd personally prefer the Joker's car to be some jalopy from the 70's. I'll take that silly flashy POS over doing something ridiculous like a live version of:
From the vids, this joker seems to be more " wacky" than the ledger version. Which is fine. Well see how that pans out.
IMO, the only one that should have silly vehicles is batman.
Anyhow i never implied that joker should have some thing ridiculous like that.
If they were going the ridiculous route then an old ice cream truck would be better.
Joker never really gave 2 shits about money or "flossing", so this take on him seems odd.
Like I said maybe it's just me.
And he does seem to have the tattoos in the film as well. So there is that too.
Originally posted by ares834
Pretty inline with Morrison's version TBH. I don't see a big probelm.
The look is almost spot on to Morrison Joker yes, minus the tattoos and grill. (Besides that dragon one on his back if I recall)
Unnecessary edgyness IMO.
And that is what I have pointed out to have bothered me a bit.
Will it ruin the film for me? Don't know. I'll have to watch the film first.
Originally posted by marwash22
he's wearing purple and suspenders, and has green hair... that's where the similarities end.we have different definition of what "spot on" means.
i can't get past the tattoos. The jewelry is also terrible.
"Spot on" was me being kind lol 🙂
Don't want to get into it with the Joker defenders.
But whatever.
I already said this joker looks ridiculous and edgy for my taste.
Originally posted by Inhuman
Weren't you posting links left and right trying to ease the backlash on the tattoos not being in the film? baka
I posted pics of Leto on the set, which to a lot of people didn't look like he had tattoos on his forehead. Even Margott Robbie posted a pic of Leto with no tattoos. But even if he didn't have the tats, you'd still complain. baka
Originally posted by Golgo13Im pretty sure you said people needed to calm down and this would be rectified. Come to find out the tats still look to be there. You're a fanboy.
I posted pics of Leto on the set, which to a lot of people didn't look like he had tattoos on his forehead. Even Margott Robbie posted a pic of Leto with no tattoos. But even if he didn't have the tats, you'd still complain. baka
Originally posted by Golgo13
Supposedly the pic is a joke. Not even the real, final pic of the Joker that Margot Robbie shared on her Twitter, which showed no tatoos from the looks of it. Hard to tell, really.
Originally posted by Golgo13
Those tattoos are photoshopped. People like Snyder and even Johns hinted that wasn't the final pic.Also, Margot Robbie released a pic of Joker on set without the tattoos.
Originally posted by Golgo13
Yeah, rest easy my fellow complainers, it was a JOKE.Calm Down! The Joker Will NOT Have Tattoos in 'Suicide Squad'When this picture of Jared Leto in his full Joker look hit the web yesterday, there was A LOT of fan backlash for how "Hot-topicy" it all looked.
But rest at ease Joker fans, it has since been revealed that this is NOT the final look for the joker. This was merely a publicity shot to celebrate 75 years of the Joker's character in the comics.
Gabriel Gray (No, not Sylar), an industry insider, had this interesting tweet to share that might perhaps calm the angry Joker fans:
i bet there is more. just dont feel like browsing for more .