Originally posted by DarthAnt66
It feels Nephthys has ran away due to the greatness of America. Nephthys, come back and worship Walmart with us.
I have other shit going on. Just stop arguing about this. You agreed with me that you just wanted to have fun and talk to people without everyone being dicks and feelings getting hurt. So far you're not showing me that.
Originally posted by DarthAnt66
Which is essentially the same as "Bantha's insult is justifiable because you said similar." 👆
I.didn't high five bantha for that either nor did I praise him. Nice to see you twisting my words to make yourself look better and me look bad.
No. I'm not resurrecting what once was, even if I wish I could still be there now.
I said Pm me those five examples, If they are true, I'll apologize, if they are not then I would have cleared up those inaccuracies. There's no harm in either of these things. Besides you're just PMing me these points, not insulting me. If Ihave said something untrue, I'd like to know if anything it'll help me recognize my mistake.
Originally posted by carthageactually all of what I posted is proof, only a form of the truth that you don't acknowledge. This is why debating with you is so utterly painful because you choose to ignore anything that goes against your point and subtly under cut what the opponent says while wanking your points using clever word placement. Examples of you doing this is are evident in all of your debates. Wins for your characters become stomps or blitzes while wins for opposing characters become stalemates. You are doing it in this debate as well calling Bane and Sirak trainees. In banes case you are just flat out wrong but in Siraks case while he is still in training you fail to mention that he is the strongest student who is an entire league above all of his contemporaries which include a battle hardened ex Jedi knight. You also never admit that even his masters neigh worship him, many of them claiming that sirak is the Sith'ari, who, to the Sith, is basically god. But you call him a trainee because that makes him sound shitty and demand that the only proof acceptable is defeating an opponent of note soley because you know no such quote exists and that means you instantly win the debate. Your debating style is out right trollish
Bantha all of what you said is pretty meaningless tbh. I asked specifically what dueling feats/what people he's beaten that makes him superior to Legadh duelists. All you typed was just a lot of nonsense I already knew, and none of it was relevant to showing actual proof in feats that make Kas'im superior to Cade, Talon, or Nihl. Being a good trainee or technically proficient are not replacements for the fact , Kas'im and Sirak have no showings in duels to put them above Legacy duelists. You already typed all of that out before, none of it is anything new.
actually all of what I posted is proof, only a form of the truth that you don't acknowledge. This is why debating with you is so utterly painful because you choose to ignore anything that goes against your point and subtly under cut what the opponent says while wanking your points using clever word placement
facepalm
Proof would be actual showings not constantly reiterating that that Sirak is "the best student at the academy or Kas'im knows all of the lightsaber forms. You're losing this debate because you can't provide any evidence that Sirak or Kas'im are better duelists than Cade, Talon, Krayt, or Nihl. Again- its not my problem you have nothing to choose from, I plainly told you to concede the point earlier. Saying "I'm trollish" or I "undercut" are just lame ad hominems on your part, either present the evidence or concede the point.
Wins for your characters become stomps or blitzes while wins for opposing characters become stalemates. You are doing it in this debate as well calling Bane and Sirak trainees. In banes case you are just flat out wrong but in Siraks case while he is still in training you fail to mention that he is the strongest student who is an entire league above all of his contemporaries which include a battle hardened ex Jedi knight.
I really wish any of this stuff mattered. Again debates are based off of proof and you bringing evidence to counter my evidence in order to substantiate your claim. You can't do that so you should either give up, or bring home actual duels that Sirak or Kas'im have won for comparable opponents. Their status means nothing if they haven't beaten comparable opponents.
note soley because you know no such quote exists and that means you instantly win the debate. Your debating style is out right trollish
So I'm the bad guy for actually supporting characters I can make reasonable assumptions based on the duels they've won? I guess anyone who supports a character with tangible feats would be "Trollish". I'm winning the debate because I can show that Talon or Nihl are skilled duelists based on their feats, not because I can keep repeating the same thing ad nauseam (Kas'im knows lightsaber forms, Sirak is the best student at the academy)- You've been doing the same thing for three pages now.
I would suggest just conceding Bantha, you have no case to be perfectly honest