Originally posted by Star428No I'm not exaggerating in any way. Remember, I know physics and math. And Superman's feats are far beyond anything Thor has done.
Superman is clearly stronger but I think what you're claiming is a bit of an exaggeration.
Post Crisis Superman's feats are at least millions of times greater, whereas DcNu Superman's feats are more than 10 times greater.
Originally posted by h1a8
No I'm not exaggerating in any way. Remember, I know physics and math. And Superman's feats are far beyond anything Thor has done.Post Crisis Superman's feats are at least millions of times greater, whereas DcNu Superman's feats are more than 10 times greater.
Why is PYM stating his Nasa math trumps Superman's feat?
Originally posted by celeyhyga17
Lol. Lowball? You're the first to lowball by using a pointless argument when we know how incredibly inconsistent comics can be in regards to a character even in the same book.
Originally posted by celeyhyga17I don't give a shit about what some random sites say. The fact is he directly lied about the source of the information
Pym's figure comes from multiple websites.I've seen quotes from scientists that suggest that ballpark figure of 53-57 quadrillion megatons.
Originally posted by abhilegend
[B]Not that inconsistent. It also shows how much difference mjolnir can make as without it, Thor was struggling to push a part of moon.
I dont see it that way. Thor was not only pushing the moon. He was holding that togheter and using his power to "reform" the ground of the moon and save the people of the planet. And he did that in few seconds...
Originally posted by eaebiakuyadoesn't matter as anyone who can lift a planet with casual ease lije Superman has no business struggling and straining with part of a moon
I dont see it that way. Thor was not only pushing the moon. He was holding that togheter and using his power to "reform" the ground of the moon and save the people of the planet. And he did that in few seconds...
Originally posted by celeyhyga17This is about correct. 57 quadrillion megatons of TNT is just slightly less than what you would need to destroy the planet Earth.
Dunno bout all that. I'm no expert and there are so many other factors, but here's a quote from an astronomer from Discover Magazine.http://www.bloomberg.com/slideshow/2012-04-19/how-to-destroy-the-planet.html#slide14
57 quadrilion megatons.