Superman VS Thor: STRENGTH RANKING

Started by pym-ftw37 pages

...are we really arguing whether WM is ten fold amp? It's stated on panel if you don't agree with that there is nothing to argue.

Odin himself has described the power WM gives Thor.

Originally posted by Sensui
Now are we to believe that Superman has literally 11 million TIMES the strength of Thor?

Yes, yes we are.

And that is a good thing!

I'm not arguing whether the amp is or isn't real. All I'm saying is that in this kind of thread only actual feats matter, not statements.

And I haven't seen any feat of WM Thor that suggest his strength is really amped x10 when he enter in this mode. What's shown > statements

Sure if we are looking at "shook creation" or "rumbled the stars" or whatever is said like that but when it allowed Thor to fight evenly with one of the highest amped Hulks ever it's a safe assumption.

I agree with Pym on that. Too many people, especially high Herald wouldn't have done as good against that Hulk than Thor did. Moments after Thor bfred Nul, the guy ripped through adamantium effortlessly and crushed enchanted Uru like tissue paper. Those are not Herald level fts. Forgot about that. Good catch Pym.

Didn't thor lost that fight too pym?

@Carv I think he's talking about the time hulk punched WM thor into orbit or something like that iirc.

Originally posted by Reflassshh
Didn't thor lost that fight too pym?

@Carv I think he's talking about the time hulk punched WM thor into orbit or something like that iirc.

I thought he was talking about the Nul fight since that version of Hulk wasn't the most powerful version. He was powerful though. Powerful enough to fight Warrior Madness Thor but I wouldn't use that as evidence of the debate here since Thor got bfred.

Originally posted by Reflassshh
I'd imagine that any top herald with a x10 amp would one-shot adam warlock physically back then tbh.

So he hasn't beat anyone with the WM he normally wouldn't to prove he's ten times stronger?

I was right then, good debate bro.

Beating someone has to do with formidability not strength. You don't grasp that very simple concept. Mike Tyson isn't as strong as Coleman the bodybuilder but he'd rape him in a fight. By your logic this proves he is stronger.

😂

Originally posted by Reflassshh
Didn't thor lost that fight too pym?

@Carv I think he's talking about the time hulk punched WM thor into orbit or something like that iirc.

Sure with Context, I'd also say base for Base Hulk is stronger than Thor (or Supes)

Originally posted by quanchi112
Beating someone has to do with formidability not strength. You don't grasp that very simple concept. Mike Tyson isn't as strong as Coleman the bodybuilder but he'd rape him in a fight. By your logic this proves he is stronger.

😂

This is a ridiculous analogy!

If Coleman were a hall of fame caliber heavyweight, THEN the issue of a disparity in strength would actually be relevant.

Originally posted by pym-ftw
Sure with Context, I'd also say base for Base Hulk is stronger than Thor (or Supes)

LIES!

Base Hulk is NOT stronger than Superman at default.

Warrior Madness has been inflicted on Thor, Zeus and Hercules before and it has never been a ten time amp.

Its just a statement with every evidence contradicting it.

Originally posted by LordofBrooklyn
This is a ridiculous analogy!

If Coleman were a hall of fame caliber heavyweight, THEN the issue of a disparity in strength would actually be relevant.

Hulk isn't skilled...

Originally posted by quanchi112
Beating someone has to do with formidability not strength. You don't grasp that very simple concept. Mike Tyson isn't as strong as Coleman the bodybuilder but he'd rape him in a fight. By your logic this proves he is stronger.

😂

I guess it's easier to make nonsensical comparisons than concede when you have no proof.

Again, good debate bro.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Warrior Madness has been inflicted on Thor, Zeus and Hercules before and it has never been a ten time amp.

Its just a statement with every evidence contradicting it.

False. Every writer has a different opinion more or less on power level. This writer made this canon whether you like it or not.

Originally posted by Reflassshh
I guess it's easier to make nonsensical comparisons than concede when you have no proof.

Again, good debate bro.

10 times is a clear number mentioned. You do not like it I do not care. It is canon.

Originally posted by quanchi112
10 times is a clear number mentioned. You do not like it I do not care. It is canon.
Without proof it is not.

Even if it were, superman's book feat > x10 thor

Originally posted by Reflassshh
Without proof it is not.

Even if it were, superman's book feat > x10 thor

I am citing a comic. We can't know a flash feat operates at a certain speed unless stated.

I disagree. It was also a shared feat which means he lifted half.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I am citing a comic. We can't know a flash feat operates at a certain speed unless stated.

I disagree. It was also a shared feat which means he lifted half.

HALF OF INFINITY> Thor 10x strength amp