Originally posted by Silent Masternow you are being deceitful to onlookers. You flamed because you blatantly misinterpreted my post against its true meaning in order to try to make me look bad.
So, my post was a flame because I stated that you ignore evidence and yet your post isn't a flame, even though you accuse Stoic of ignoring evidence?You might to look up the phrase (double standard).
Stoic is ignoring on panel evidence by arguing that both Batman's feats don't count in deciding who is faster. He is basing his argument solely off Gamora's strength and disregarding everything Batman has done. So no matter what Batman's feats are it doesn't matter to him.
Originally posted by h1a8
now you are being deceitful to onlookers. You flamed because you blatantly misinterpreted my post against its true meaning in order to try to make me look bad.Stoic is ignoring on panel evidence by arguing that both Batman's feats don't count in deciding who is faster. He is basing his argument solely off Gamora's strength and disregarding everything Batman has done. So no matter what Batman's feats are it doesn't matter to him.
What feats did you actually bring up? What have you actually proven except for seemingly lacking common sense? What? Batman dodges bullets shot by a nervous thug while being in motion before he shot off 3 bullets? Gamora can dodge bullets as well, and she has dodged lasers without knowing that she was going to be fired on. You still have to answer the main question of my post before this one. You know what question that is?
Why did you give Gamora the win over Batman without the swords? You said because she was stronger than he was, but then you said that Batman has defeated people even stronger than Gamora. So why did you give her the win? We all know that you believe that Gamora is superior to him, or you wouldn't have made this handicap match. So again why?
Originally posted by Silent Masterno, you blatantly did it as for the purpose of flaming.
So now you're claiming that I misinterpreted your post in order to make you look bad, while at the same time misinterpreting Stoic's argument.I can't believe that I have to say this again, but you might want to look up the phrase (double standard).
Originally posted by StoicI brung up several.
What feats did you actually bring up? What have you actually proven except for seemingly lacking common sense? What Batman dodges bullets shot by a nervous thug while being in motion before he shot off 3 bullets? Gamora can dodge bullets as well, and she has dodged lasers without knowing that she was going to be fired on. You still have to answer the main question of my post before this one. You know what questions that is?Why did you give Gamora the win over Batman without the swords? You said because she was stronger than he was, but then you said that Batman has defeated people even stronger than Gamora. So why did you give her the win? We all know that you believe that Gamora is superior to him, or you wouldn't have made this handicap match. So again why?
Show me Gamora dodging a laser after it was fired. Show me Gamora reacting to bullets in flight and not just using evasive moves before they were fired to avoid being hit.
Originally posted by Silent Masterwhere did I misinterpret Stoic? Show me.
Like you did to Stoic, or does it only count as flaming when it happens to you?
For the sake of argument, if another poster breaks forum rules doesn't give another the right to do so. That's called the "you do it too" fallacy.
You are purposely flaming, doesn't matter what I did.
Originally posted by h1a8
I brung up several.
Batman moving to catch arrow only after it was inches away. Batman easily batting bullets out of the air one by one. Batman moving to deflect a laser AFTER the laser entered the air.Show me Gamora dodging a laser after it was fired. Show me Gamora reacting to bullets in flight and not just using evasive moves before they were fired to avoid being hit.
Arrows move slower than bullets by a large margin. This is not something that Gamora can not do. Dodging bullets is also something that she can easily do. Perhaps someone else can provide scans of her dodging the laser that I am speaking of, as for now I will look up more of her feats. Also check out this page, and look at the third picture.
Originally posted by Stoicno they don't. Arrows can move slightly more than half the speed of many handgun bullets. Reacting to Arrow less than a foot away is the same as reacting to a bullet moving twice as fast from a few feet away.
Arrows move slower than bullets by a large margin. This is not something that Gamora can not do. Dodging bullets is also something that she can easily do. Perhaps someone else can provide scans of her dodging the laser that I am speaking of, as for now I will look up more of her feats. Also check out this page, and look at the third picture.
Originally posted by h1a8
I brung up several.
Batman moving to catch arrow only after it was inches away. Batman easily batting bullets out of the air one by one. Batman moving to deflect a laser AFTER the laser entered the air.Show me Gamora dodging a laser after it was fired. Show me Gamora reacting to bullets in flight and not just using evasive moves before they were fired to avoid being hit.
I'm still waiting for you to answer my questions.
On this page you will see her dodging lasers a few times, and it's still not the one that I was talking about
Originally posted by h1a8
no they don't. Arrows can move slightly more than half the speed of many handgun bullets. Reacting to Arrow less than a foot away is the same as reacting to a bullet moving twice as fast from a few feet away.
What is faster, a bullet or an arrow? A bullet right? So why argue the point? Is there something wrong with you? Serious question.
Originally posted by h1a8
I'm sorry. What's the question.Also I know bullets move faster than arrows. But reacting to something is exactly the same as reacting to something moving twice as fast from twice the distance.
I showed you what strength translated to in direct relation to her speed with this page that I posted.
http://collider.com/guardians-of-the-galaxy-profile-gamora/
What did you come back with? Bullets vs Arrows.
So an arrow coming from 6-8 inches versus a bullet from a few feet? Is this what you are using for comparisons? Just do us both a favor, and drop it. I gave you several instances of her dodging lasers which move faster than bullets. One scene has her doing it against a real threat (Thanos), and not some nervous trigger happy street punk. Now you forget the questions? No problem.
These are the questions below.
Why did you give Gamora the win over Batman without the swords? You said because she was stronger than he was, but then you said that Batman has defeated people even stronger than Gamora. So why did you give her the win? We all know that you believe that Gamora is superior to him, or you wouldn't have made this handicap match. So again why?