Darth Bane & Darth Zannah vs. Anakin Skywalker & Obi-Wan Kenobi [SABERS ONLY]

Happened to Maul twice, DMB.

Originally posted by Nephthys
Zannah vs Obi-Wan seems unlikely to happen.

I don't see why.

Originally posted by NewGuy01
I don't see why.

Two Soresu duelists? Both let the opponent go to them, why would they engage each other? Djem So vs Soresu seems a more likely outcome. Aggression vs defense matches up more naturally.

Originally posted by ares834
People would report him for saying Bane was weak... 😬

On threads that didn't have Bane in the title. =/

Anakin vs. Bane is more likely, as the aggressive guys run right into each other.

And one of Maul's cut saberstaffs is courtesy of ObiWan. He could easily do the same to Zannah.

Originally posted by Angelalex242
....It seems I owe you guys an apology.

I had thought the purpose of the list was to serve as an impartial judge to streamline vs threads.

At least, that's why I've chosen to work on it.

It was made because someone was being overly-sensitive on the internet, basically.

Originally posted by Angelalex242
Anakin vs. Bane is more likely, as the aggressive guys run right into each other.

And one of Maul's cut saberstaffs is courtesy of ObiWan. He could easily do the same to Zannah.

Bane kicks Anakin's ass then. 😖hrug:

I literally just explained why he couldn't.

Team 2 easily

Anakin is many tiers above Bane its laughable people are even attempting to make a comparison, and Kenobi can actually generate offense and has actually beaten superior duelists to Set Harth

Originally posted by Emperordmb
Using a list such as that as an argument as to why one character beats another is inherently flawed in and of itself, even disregarding the fact that the list was made, coordinated, adjusted, and moderated by a person with a completely blatant anti-Bane bias. Even disregarding that, using a tier list as an argument is flawed.

It's only correct when he's ranked highly, right? Lol.

Just because Carthage hates the Bane era and Ant hates women in general does not mean the characters they shit on are weak.

Bane ad Zannah > Anakin and Obi Wan

Originally posted by red8
Ant hates women in general

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
I have more female friends then male, broski.

Quite defensive there... 🙂

Originally posted by Nalaniel
On threads that didn't have Bane in the title. =/

And? Put him on ignore if you care that much.

Flagging this for a mismatch 👆

Neither of them can compare to Anakin or Kenobi as a duelists.

I still think Anakin would take Bane. For all the latter is a Sithari, the former is still THE Chosen One.

Even if most everything Chosen about him pretty much skipped a generation.

Bane has literally only beaten Sirak, and that was still with a nexus amp.

Bane has no skill feats to compare to beating Dooku or Ventress. This is a massive mismatch.

Zannah would also get stomped by Kenobi

Certainly, since Kenobi has proven skill severing Maul's saberstaff, and Maul is a far better duelist.

I've already indicated why it's unlikely Kenobi can sever Zannah's saberstaff and you've so far been unable to indicate otherwise bro.

Any more unlikely than Zannah beating him in a duel?

Originally posted by Angelalex242
Certainly, since Kenobi has proven skill severing Maul's saberstaff, and Maul is a far better duelist.

That was a One-Off. It's not like Kenobi can do that any time he likes.

If he could he certainly would have cut Opress's Saber Staff in the numerous times he fought him 10 years on.