Originally posted by Insane TitanI would like to see that as proof. Cause the comic doesn't state that. My problem is why show Drax destroying planets and demonstrating his power to fight Thanos but he's nothing but kryptonite? Kryptonite doesn't have to be as powerful.
Giffen who wrote Drax killing Thanos in Annihilation even said Drax's presance negated Thanos power/made him weaker.
Originally posted by h1a8you're too stupid to understand.
I would like to see that as proof. Cause the comic doesn't state that. My problem is why show Drax destroying planets and demonstrating his power to fight Thanos but he's nothing but kryptonite? Kryptonite doesn't have to be as powerful.
Drax dies at the beginning of Annihilation and undergoes several incarnation transformations.
Which is all made pretty clear by Drax radiating green energy and developing claws to tear through Thanos own self created personal sheilds
Originally posted by Insane TitanI'll reread it. I never saw where they explained that his presense makes Thanos weaker. He could just have the ability to adapt or amp for all we know.
you're too stupid to understand.Drax dies at the beginning of Annihilation and undergoes several incarnation transformations.
Which is all made pretty clear by Drax radiating green energy and developing claws to tear through Thanos own self created personal sheilds
Originally posted by h1a8see you didn't even read my first post properly , I said it was the writer Keith Giffen who made the statement in a interview.
I have, a while ago. Like I said, I don't remember it stating to weaken Thanos. I'll reread it just in case I missed context clues.
Then it was shown in the prelude comic to Infinty revelations that Thanos was in a weak state when Drax kills him. This happens when a Thanos avatar is speaking with a Thanos from the past.
Originally posted by thingy150
Depends on the version but drax has always been stronger then gamora, he has done much more to prove this in the way of feats.I see stoic has not given up on arguing without proof......
I see that you haven't a clue like always, and I can't wait for your next ban to hit you in the face.
Originally posted by thingy150
You would be salty considering every exchange we have ever had has lead to you never proving your claims and inevitably running away like a bullied child in a schoolyard.
I actually have proven everything that I wrote. It's really not up to me to show you the comics that my points come from. You've either read them, or you haven't. Also you've been reported twice already for attempting to start a flame war. Keep it up, it just adds to whatever else people will report on you. It won't be long before you've embarrassed yourself once again.
Originally posted by Stoic
I actually have proven everything that I wrote. It's really not up to me to show you the comics that my points come from. You've either read them, or you haven't. Also you've been reported twice already for attempting to start a flame war. Keep it up, it just adds to whatever else people will report on you. It won't be long before you've embarrassed yourself once again.
Lol, looks like I have been unjustly reported by the all mighty stoic. Seems that I struck a nerve.
Not once have you used scans in this argument that gamora is stronger then drax and the only thing you have is that she tossed ronan, drax can fight evenly with thanos.
You have said multiple times that it is because he is his "kryptonite" but that is untrue, he was made to destroy him but the only time he was like his kryptonite was when he ripped thanos heart out. The rest of the times drax has fought thanos he has just been near that strength level. Drax was made to be on thanos's level, he was not made as kryptonite and only one time was he anywhere near "kryptonite".
Gamora does not have the feats to put her on his strength level, she may be better in other areas but strength is not even close to one.
Drax' unique ability to counter Thanos hasn't lingered since Annihilation. This should be common knowledge by now.
I don't see how anyone would try to write off Drax punching Thanos in the face as him being Thanos' "Kryptonite". Is Groot also Thanos' Kryptonite then?
With the exception of Drax pulling out Thanos' heart and pulling apart his forcefield, his feats against Thanos have all been legit and within the reasonable capabilities of someone who's around class 80-100.
Originally posted by krisblaze
Drax' unique ability to counter Thanos hasn't lingered since Annihilation. This should be common knowledge by now.I don't see how anyone would try to write off Drax punching Thanos in the face as him being Thanos' "Kryptonite". Is Groot also Thanos' Kryptonite then?
With the exception of Drax pulling out Thanos' heart and pulling apart his forcefield, his feats against Thanos have all been legit and within the reasonable capabilities of someone who's around class 80-100.
Exactly what I am saying, stoic must have read annihilation and assume that this is the case with all of drax and thanos's battles.....
Also stoic, if you are going to report me then just report me, you do not however try and argue with me also, it cancels out the reporting.
Technically you started a flame war.
lets just shake hands and admit that you have not proven gamora to be stronger.
(the ending of the shake hands thing was in fact a joke)
Originally posted by krisblaze
Drax' unique ability to counter Thanos hasn't lingered since Annihilation. This should be common knowledge by now.I don't see how anyone would try to write off Drax punching Thanos in the face as him being Thanos' "Kryptonite". Is Groot also Thanos' Kryptonite then?
With the exception of Drax pulling out Thanos' heart and pulling apart his forcefield, his feats against Thanos have all been legit and within the reasonable capabilities of someone who's around class 80-100.
No Drax was never on Thanos' level. Are you kidding me? This would mean that Drax would be able to kick the crap out of Thor. Perhaps before making these statements you should go back and look at Thanos' battle with the Surfer, Power Gem Thor, Odin, and Tyrant. Then go back an see Drax's battles with Nova Prime when he is easily dealt with. Once you are done with that look at how easily Thanos took apart Beta Ray Bill, and was able to take hits to the face by Thor with the Power gem, and how he recently took a hit to the head from Thor when the Avengers faced off against the Cabal. Are you going to tell me that Drax can do any of that? When he fights Thanos, Drax does better than he does against anyone else. Drax was unable to KO Angela with a sneak attack,, and you think that he is a class 80-100? Angela wasn't even expecting to be hit by Drax. Agreeing with Thingy is probably the worst thing that you could do at this point. The kid only knows how to incite flame wars, and only entered the thread for that purpose.
Stoic, huge misunderstanding on your behalf here mate.
Nowhere in my post does it say that Drax is Thanos' equal.
I said that it's entirely within the realm of possibility for Drax to be able to punch Thanos without being his Kryptonite, and then I pointed out that Groot had done the same.
Saying that it's possible for Drax to punch Thanos does not in any way imply that he is Thanos' equal or superior, but that he's strong enough to punch him.
Originally posted by Stoic
No Drax was never on Thanos' level. Are you kidding me? This would mean that Drax would be able to kick the crap out of Thor. Perhaps before making these statements you should go back and look at Thanos' battle with the Surfer, Power Gem Thor, Odin, and Tyrant. Then go back an see Drax's battles with Nova Prime when he is easily dealt with. Once you are done with that look at how easily Thanos took apart Beta Ray Bill, and was able to take hits to the face by Thor with the Power gem, and how he recently took a hit to the head from Thor when the Avengers faced off against the Cabal. Are you going to tell me that Drax can do any of that? When he fights Thanos, Drax does better than he does against anyone else. Drax was unable to KO Angela with a sneak attack,, and you think that he is a class 80-100? Angela wasn't even expecting to be hit by Drax. Agreeing with Thingy is probably the worst thing that you could do at this point. The kid only knows how to incite flame wars, and only entered the thread for that purpose.
First of all like he said, you completely misunderstood his comment. This comment does nothing to prove your stance on gamora being stronger then drax when she has never been shown to be. Your lack of logic and lack of proof at this point is utterly hilarious. Drax has held his own against thanos and you denying this will not stop that. A total of one time drax had an advantage due to possessing a power up he cannot and never did recreate. All of the time drax has fought thanos it has been purely off of his physical power not due to him being thanos's "kryptonite" only with the exception to annihilation.
I made a accurate comment about you not proving gamora to be stronger and you still have not, you do this and continue to do this every thread where you claim wrong things and never prove them.
Takes two people to flame war and you do this quite often, the tone of this comment directed at krisblaze proves so. You f*cked with me for being banned so I came up with a retort after this you got butthurt and reported me. You cannot try and argue and report someone, that is simply stupid, choose one or the other, you cant report and do the same thing you're reporting about.
Originally posted by krisblaze
Stoic, huge misunderstanding on your behalf here mate.Nowhere in my post does it say that Drax is Thanos' equal.
I said that it's entirely within the realm of possibility for Drax to be able to punch Thanos without being his Kryptonite, and then I pointed out that Groot had done the same.
Saying that it's possible for Drax to punch Thanos does not in any way imply that he is Thanos' equal or superior, but that he's strong enough to punch him.
Groot hit a weakened Thanos that just woke up, It was different in the scans that Carver presented. A class 80-100 would not rock Thanos like he did if he weren't biologically engineered to hurt Thanos. Look at the hit that Thanos took to the face from Power gem Thor, or when Thanos took hits from Odin. Thanos took apart Beta Ray Bill. Bill has gone through hell and remained conscious (look at the Storm Breaker mini for example). When Drax hit Thanos when they were in the Cancerverse, Thanos was no longer in a weakened state. Being blasted several times by the CCU proves this without a doubt, and if that's not enough, he goes on to defeat the Cancerverse Avengers alone, and Lord Mar-Vell was also defeated. With the heat that Drax gave Thanos when they were in the Cancerverse, we would have to conclude that he hits harder than Thor with the Power gem, because he was reeling from Drax's assault.
So what makes sence to you? We see that Drax ripped through shields that have withstood Galactus' assault, and Omega's assault, but Drax rips through them like they did not exist? But on the other hand Richard Rider was able to defeat Drax uncontested. You tell me what makes sense here when Drax was empowered by Mentor, and Kronos to defeat their son/grandson Thanos. Just let me know what makes sense to you.