Originally posted by Time Immemorial
So wait, what makes him faster then Clark who was going from one part of the globe to the other in seconds? Because he flew to the moon and painted it?
As I said previously, you have no proof that it only took him seconds to do this. There was no way to measure time between how long he flew to those places.
And again, there's no proof that Hancock can't move that fast.
Besides, I don't understand why we're comparing flying speed here, it's not like they're going for a race. Why not compare their speed while in combat, where it's clear that Hancock is faster.