Hancock vs MOS Superman

Originally posted by FrothByte
I said he moved so fast that he couldn't be seen on camera or by the people around him. He wasn't. You have failed to prove otherwise.

I said he didn't have a blur behind him IN THAT PARTICULAR SCENE. And I was proven correct.

I said Superman never moved so fast that he didn't leave a blur and was all but invisible... this still remains true.

He was seen on camera because I saw him 😆

Clark didn't have blur's behind him when he was doing stuff like that close to the ground, so you fail.

They both had scenes leaving blurs and not leaving blurs, you dont even know what you are debating anymore, so you are saying that leaving blurs and not leaving blurs makes one faster then the other when infact they both left blurs. Quit being dumb.

As shown here when he is flying really high in the atmosphere there is a contrail behind him. This is common among most fast moving objects way up. Hancock had one too. Then shown at min 2:10 he flys closer to the ground like Hancock there is no blur. So you are wrong again. So what you are saying is cause hancock didn't leave a blur in the bank, he's faster then MoS, you're quiet stupid to think that makes him faster. He was just leaving blur's up in the air.

Keep trying, and watch the movie..

YouTube video

Yes, there is no blur behind Superman because YOU CAN ACTUALLY SEE HIM.

The main point of the debate was that Hancock was so fast that he was invisible, didn't even leave a blur. Keep up with the discussion.

Superman is either fully visible or he is a blur. Show me one instance where he moved so fast that he became invisible and I'll concede your point.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Yes, there is no blur behind Superman because YOU CAN ACTUALLY SEE HIM.

The main point of the debate was that Hancock was so fast that he was invisible, didn't even leave a blur.

Superman is either fully visible or he is a blur. Show me one instance where he moved so fast that he became invisible and I'll concede your point.

Wrong he was shown invisible because on screen cause I saw him fly in, its never shown anywhere on anyones feat flying that close to the ground leaves a blur..if you knew anything about flight, and aviation you would know what contrails are and they only happen at certain altitudes. You are out of your depth.

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
Wrong he was shown invisible because on screen cause I saw him fly in, its never shown anywhere on anyones feat flying that close to the ground leaves a blur..if you knew anything about flight, and aviation you would know what contrails are and they only happen at certain altitudes. You are out of your depth.

Yeah, you saw him on screen when he finished moving. You don't see him pass through, all you see is broken glass.

You're trying too hard to sound smart... but it literally has nothing to do with the debate. Getting a "blur" from fast motion is not the same as leaving contrails. We're not talking about contrails, don't even know why that came out.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Yeah, you saw him on screen when he finished moving. You don't see him pass through, all you see is broken glass.

You're trying too hard to sound smart... but it literally has nothing to do with the debate. Getting a "blur" from fast motion is not the same as leaving contrails. We're not talking about contrails, don't even know why that came out.

Lol no, the guys head was blocking him from being seen, Hancock is clearly seen flying in and as the camera pans left in front of the guys head, he is gone..you are trying to hard to make him seem "invisible" when it was shitty camera angles and peoples heads in the way..

I give up. You are clearly seeing something that I'm not (or are simply seeing things). In any case, I debated this fight to death long ago. Don't have the energy to argue for it again.

Originally posted by FrothByte
I give up. You are clearly seeing something that I'm not (or are simply seeing things). In any case, I debated this fight to death long ago. Don't have the energy to argue for it again.

I really can't understand why you can't see him fly into the window.. But whatever is the case we got off OP. Flight speed is not really OP. So draw on this.

Wait, are people seriously doubting that a guy who moves at massively hypersonic speeds can't move fast enough to appear invisible to humans? ****ing seriously?

It doesn't take supersonic to accomplish that.....

Pretty much...the wank over that one small scene rivals Hulk levithan punch..