Originally posted by FrothByte
Now you're just being petty. You know darn well that Hancock didn't just hide behind some people. Quit dodging the question and address it properly.
Lets see here, how is he invisible from the audience, I saw him fly in the first time, and by the time the camera panned left, he was already gone and the main leader guy was not looking in the direction he came in but as soon as he heard the glass break he turned his head..
The second time, the leader guy head was blocking the view of him flying in, the guy completely had his back turned. Either you made all this shit up, or you just testing to see if you could get away with all this bs to favor your side.
Watch the film again, or better yet, let me save you the effort.
Yeah leader had his back turned, but the other guys didn't. None of them saw him. All of them have that same bewildered look on his face. Either you're completely blind or you just refuse to acknowledge what's right in front of your face. Bottom line is, Superman NEVER moved like that. He always leaves some sort of a blur.
Originally posted by FrothByte
Yeah leader had his back turned, but the other guys didn't. None of them saw him. All of them have that same bewildered look on his face. Either you're completely blind or you just refuse to acknowledge what's right in front of your face. Bottom line is, Superman NEVER moved like that. He always leaves some sort of a blur.
A bullet travels far less speed. Do people see those when they are shot at them? Your acting like this was some hyper sonic speed. Quit being ignorant..and Hancock has the same blue behind him when he travels...watch the movie.
I showed you undeniable truth that you were making things up and said the cera could not even see him, and the thugs had their backs turned. And he only needed to be traveling 1000-3000 fps to be invisible to the eye. However the camera still caught him, which earlier you said it didn't. So you are either blind or ignoring the film showing.
Originally posted by Robtard
"For starters, the moon is not stuck in place with one side facing us. Our lunar companion rotates while it orbits Earth. It’s just that the amount of time it takes the moon to complete a revolution on its axis is the same it takes to circle our planet — about 27 days. As a result, the same lunar hemisphere always faces Earth."
I didn't know that.
Originally posted by KingD19
Because he flew to the moon, acquired millions to billions of gallons of paint, painted it, and came back all before the hundreds of people who had spent all night outside noticed it.
Prove he did it on his own. Perhaps he stole or borrowed a rocket ship to make the trip.
Originally posted by KingD19
They didn't begin to notice the All-Heart logo until Hancock pointed it out to Ray and it shocked the hell out of him, which means he didn't know until just that moment. The world didn't know or it would have been news and Ray would have mentioned it in the conversation.
Perhaps people just didn't notice because of plot. Perhaps people did notice but Ray was so concerned with his family that they all never noticed or watched the news.
Originally posted by KingD19
The Moon is nearly 240,000 miles from Earth. Hancock's moon feat > Flying around the Earth in seconds.
Again prove he made the trip under his own power. Superman did fly across the planet himself since we actually see him do it.
Originally posted by KingD19
The speed he had to use to do that puts him above Clark.
All you're doing is speculating. While you may be right the problem is there is no proof. That's why we need to drop the moon thing and focus on what we can actually quantify like the bank scene.
As of right now, we don't know what other powers Hancock possess. But Hancock and Superman is pretty much stalemate. But what I have read about Hancock is that he is a true Immortal and cannot be killed only by nearing his wife. So if that is a valid truth then my buck goes to Hancock.
Originally posted by juggerman
Prove he did it on his own. Perhaps he stole or borrowed a rocket ship to make the trip.Perhaps people just didn't notice because of plot. Perhaps people did notice but Ray was so concerned with his family that they all never noticed or watched the news.
Again prove he made the trip under his own power. Superman did fly across the planet himself since we actually see him do it.
All you're doing is speculating. While you may be right the problem is there is no proof. That's why we need to drop the moon thing and focus on what we can actually quantify like the bank scene.
Originally posted by theTANTALIZER
As of right now, we don't know what other powers Hancock possess. But Hancock and Superman is pretty much stalemate. But what I have read about Hancock is that he is a true Immortal and cannot be killed only by nearing his wife. So if that is a valid truth then my buck goes to Hancock.
Superman has been around way longer then Hancock, how is Hancock more Immortal then him? Supes snaps his neck.
Originally posted by Time Immemorial
A bullet travels far less speed. Do people see those when they are shot at them? Your acting like this was some hyper sonic speed. Quit being ignorant..and Hancock has the same blue behind him when he travels...watch the movie.I showed you undeniable truth that you were making things up and said the cera could not even see him, and the thugs had their backs turned. And he only needed to be traveling 1000-3000 fps to be invisible to the eye. However the camera still caught him, which earlier you said it didn't. So you are either blind or ignoring the film showing.
A bullet is extremely tiny compared to Hancock or Superman. Failed comparison.
By posting that vid you actually proved me correct.
And Hancock is ancient. What's this crap you're saying about Supes being older?
Originally posted by FrothByte
A bullet is extremely tiny compared to Hancock or Superman. Failed comparison.By posting that vid you actually proved me correct.
And Hancock is ancient. What's this crap you're saying about Supes being older?
Fist you said he was to fast for the camera. However that was proved false. Then you said he was too fast for them to see, yet they their backs turned. Yes he was moving fast then you said he didn't have a blue behind him when he flew, again yes he does. Watch him flying throughout the rest of the movie. But to suggest that one feat was moving faster then Clark is laughable. You would have had a better argument with him traveling to the moon cause I destroyed this one.
Originally posted by Robtard
Not that "has been around longer" has any bearing on this fight, but Hancock is at least 3,000ish years old, if not considerably older.
Hancock was the most powerful person in his universe to note. All he had to contend with was humans trying to kill him. Kal fought multiple other beings and technology on his level trying to kill him.
Originally posted by Time Immemorial
Hancock was the most powerful person in his universe to note. All he had to contend with was humans trying to kill him. Kal fought multiple other beings and technology on his level trying to kill him.
OKay, that was a weird non sequitur.
But on the point you brought up now. Hancock did fight someone more powerful than himself, his pissed off ex-wife
Originally posted by Time Immemorial
Fist you said he was to fast for the camera. However that was proved false. Then you said he was too fast for them to see, yet they their backs turned. Yes he was moving fast then you said he didn't have a blue behind him when he flew, again yes he does. Watch him flying throughout the rest of the movie. But to suggest that one feat was moving faster then Clark is laughable. You would have had a better argument with him traveling to the moon cause I destroyed this one.
Yeah... no. You didn't prove anything false. You posted a video that proved I was right. This debate is not going to move forward till you address this issue. One or two guys having their backs turned does not explain how all the other people in the room were oblivious to Hancock.
Originally posted by FrothByte
Yeah... no. You didn't prove anything false. You posted a video that proved I was right. This debate is not going to move forward till you address this issue. One or two guys having their backs turned does not explain how all the other people in the room were oblivious to Hancock.
In correct, you said he could not been seen on camera, which he was.
You said he moved faster then they could see, they had their backs turned.
You said he didn't have a blur behind him when he flys. Yet he does the throughout the whole movie..
You lost..
Originally posted by Time Immemorial
In correct, you said he could not been seen on camera, which he was.You said he moved faster then they could see, they had their backs turned.
You said he didn't have a blur behind him when he flys. Yet he does the throughout the whole movie..
You lost..
I said he moved so fast that he couldn't be seen on camera or by the people around him. He wasn't. You have failed to prove otherwise.
I said he didn't have a blur behind him IN THAT PARTICULAR SCENE. And I was proven correct.
I said Superman never moved so fast that he didn't leave a blur and was all but invisible... this still remains true.