Clubber Lane runs the gauntlet

Started by juggerman26 pages

Originally posted by Kotor3
Rocky kick Lang’s ass in the second fight.

Let us examine the fight.
• Round 1 – Rocky hits Lang with everything he has.
o Lang lands no hits
o Rocky is unable to knock down Lang
o Rocky punches does nothing but piss Lang off
• Round 2 – Lang destroys Rocky
o Knocks him down 2 times before the round is over
o Rocky is told that he cannot go toe to toe with Lang by Apollo
• Round 3 – Rocky resorts to the rope a dope strategy
o Rocky lets Lang punch himself out while he blocks and doges his hits
o When Lang is tired and weak Rocky unloads on him.

Facts:
• Rocky hits had no effect on a full strength Lang
• Rocky had to change his fighting style in order to compete with Lang
• No opponent Rocky faced required him to change his fighting style and employ as much strategy as he did with Lang.

Rocky kicked Lang’s ass. LOL.

👆

Fact: Rocky beat Lang in under 4 rounds.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Fact: Rocky beat Lang in under 4 rounds.

That doesn't take away anything he said

Originally posted by juggerman
That doesn't take away anything he said

His biased take on the fight doesn't change the fact hat Rocky beat Lang in a mere few rounds, whereas Drago went the distance.

Nothing he said was untrue.

Drago didn't go the distance. He fell just short of it

Originally posted by juggerman
Nothing he said was untrue.

Drago didn't go the distance. He fell just short of it

Drago made it to the last round, Lang only made it to the 3rd.

Drago had stamina whereas Lang did not. Still doesn't affect anything he said. He never claimed Lang lasted longer.

He's trying to claim that Lang would be a hard opponent for Drago to beat, despite the fact that Lang has zero feats that would support such a claim.

Yeah, that's silly on his part in general but Lang was a unique challenge for Rocky. People here, not saying you, should stop downplaying him so much like he was fodder

Originally posted by Silent Master
His biased take on the fight doesn't change the fact hat Rocky beat Lang in a mere few rounds, whereas Drago went the distance.

LOL. Biased, I call out facts and you say biased. Sounds like you are the biased one.

Here is a fact for you, Lang has beaten Rocky, Drago has not, ever. I like how you call biased when all Lang supporters here on this thread are taking nothing away from Drago but simply pointing out facts to show that a battle between the two would be no stomping by Drago.

Your absolute refusal to recognize any of Lang feats or facts mentioned by me and others show that you are the biggest biased Drago fan on this thread.

You have not pointed out or said one thing to prove Drago would stomp Lang.

Originally posted by juggerman
Nope

Yep.

Yes, biased...as you continue to ignore the context involved in Rocky's loss to Lang, you also ignore that both lost to post Apollo training Rocky(only Drago lasted 5x as long).

It's like you honestly believe that Drago would have lost to the version of Rocky that Lang managed to beat.

Since my last post of facts for Lang did not reach all the biased Drago fans, let me break it down this in more simple terms to show that Drago would not stomp Lang.
1. I already provide concrete proof that Rocky’s punches had no effect on a full strength Lang as seen in the first two rounds of their first and second fights. So this proves that more powerful punches of a considerable measure would be needed to have an effect on a full strength Lang.
2. To say that Rocky in part IV would stomp or take out Lang fighting the same way he fought Drago, we have first have to prove that the Rocky whose punches hurt and knock out Drago, had drastically become more powerful than they were in part III. (Key word is drastically). Otherwise, there is nothing to back up such statements. We have to only conclude that Rocky IV version would lose fighting Lang in the same manner that he fought Drago, head on.
3. If Drago can stomp Lang, then we are saying that the Rocky IV version of Rocky hits harder than Lang. There is nothing to back up such a statement.
4. The conclusion: Lang hits would do damage to Drago as Rocky hits did. Drago hits would damage Lang.
5. You would have a slugfest that would probably last 2 to 3 rounds at most.

No stomping from either opponent.

Advantage would go to Drago due to his height and stamina.

Fact 1: Rocky beat Lang in three rounds
Fact 2: Drago hits harder than Rocky
Fact 3: Drago would beat Lang

Originally posted by Silent Master
Yes, biased...as you continue to ignore the context involved in Rocky's loss to Lang, you also ignore that both lost to post Apollo training Rocky(only Drago lasted 5x as long).

It's like you honestly believe that Drago would have lost to the version of Rocky that Lang managed to beat.


Ignore context. I explained the context of Rocky being defeated in previous post. So, I have not ignore nothing. However, since you are good at calling me out for things I missed or am, please tell me what the context is in which Rocky lost to Lang.

You've been told multiple times.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Fact 1: Rocky beat Lang in three rounds
Fact 2: Drago hits harder than Rocky
Fact 3: Drago would beat Lang

LOL. Don't bother to reply to my other comment. You say I ignore and am biased.
Great argument.

I'm glad that you agree with the following facts

Fact 1: Rocky beat Lang in three rounds
Fact 2: Drago hits harder than Rocky
Fact 3: Drago would beat Lang

Originally posted by Silent Master
I'm glad that you agree with the following facts

Fact 1: Rocky beat Lang in three rounds
Fact 2: Drago hits harder than Rocky
Fact 3: Drago would beat Lang


When haven't I? Please post where I stated otherwise. Do you even know what point you are making or what is being argued?

I'm glad you are no longer implying a stomp by Drago. I gladly accept your concession.

It will be a stomp, as Lang has zero feats that suggest he can take Drago level hits for even 1 round.