(Rematch) The Hulk (MCU) VS Thor (MCU)

Started by Silent Master64 pages
Originally posted by FrothByte
Except you have no proof that anger increases Hulk's durability and endurance or that it removes his need to breathe.

He also also has no proof that MCU Hulk has unlimited anger.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Except you have no proof that anger increases Hulk's durability and endurance or that it removes his need to breathe.
when angered or provoked, he would transform into the huge rage-fueled

Hulk is a rage fueled character. Everything he can do depends on his rage.

His durability and strength does increase.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FV0ZPGxiNBA

Spoiler:
Not to mention that in Ragnarok Hulk is clearly seen in space with no need to breathe
.

I think i have proven my points already.

Originally posted by Silent Master
He also also has no proof that MCU Hulk has unlimited anger.

Heck, he mentioned that anger is unlimited even in normal people. I proved him wrong, he sidestepped that.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Hulk is a rage fueled character. Everything he can do depends on his rage.

His durability and strength does increase.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FV0ZPGxiNBA

Spoiler:
Not to mention that in Ragnarok Hulk is clearly seen in space with no need to breathe
.

I think i have proven my points already.

Meh. Your definition of "prove" and my definition of "prove" seem to be very different.

Anyway, I'm going to wait for Imp's ruling and then go from there.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Heck, he mentioned that anger is unlimited even in normal people. I proved him wrong, he sidestepped that.

It is limited because our bodies can't take such levels of stress.

But a renerative superbody like the Hulk doesn't suffer such things.

Further Evidence proving my case:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Ske-byMM_I

Again, there isn't a limit to anger. It isn't a quantifiable thing. You can't measure it.

Our bodies won't tolerate high levels of anger, doesn't mean there is a limit to anger. You have proven nothing really

Originally posted by FrothByte
Meh. Your definition of "prove" and my definition of "prove" seem to be very different.

Anyway, I'm going to wait for Imp's ruling and then go from there.

Evidence is evidence.

I have given it. Am waiting for you to do so too.

Okay, nice. A third opinion wouldn't be bad.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Evidence is evidence.

I have given it. Am waiting for you to do so too.

Okay, nice. A third opinion wouldn't be bad.

A third opinion? You do know that there were already at least 3 other people who pointed out to you the same things I'm saying right?

Originally posted by FrothByte
Heck, he mentioned that anger is unlimited even in normal people. I proved him wrong, he sidestepped that.

Notice that he also keeps posting "evidence" from sources that aren't allowed in MvF debates and that even then, his "evidence" doesn't actually say that MCU Hulk has unlimited strength or anger.

Originally posted by FrothByte
A third opinion? You do know that there were already at least 3 other people who pointed out to you the same things I'm saying right?

This is a debate between you and me. You are the only one who has questioned Hulk's abilities.

(I don't take SilentMaster's opinion seriously so let's just leave him out 😂 )

So basically there’s an attempt here to turn this into Comic Book Hulk vs Movie Thor.

Oh how this film has destroyed the Hulk fanboys.

Remove your blinders.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
So basically there’s an attempt here to turn this into Comic Book Hulk vs Movie Thor.

Oh how this film has destroyed the Hulk fanboys.

No. It's giving Movie Hulk what he possesses.

And i'ts not an attempt. I has already been proven.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
No. It's giving Movie Hulk what he possesses.

And i'ts not an attempt. I has already been proven.

If that were true, you wouldn't have to use comics or fansites as your "evidence".

Originally posted by Silent Master
If that were true, you wouldn't have to use comics or fansites as your "evidence".

If in case you didn't notice i already proved my point without using comics.

If you are not interesting in participating and actually reading what people is writing PLEASE limit yourself to spectate

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
If in case you didn't notice i already proved my point without using comics.

If you are not interesting in participating and actually reading what people is writing [B] PLEASE limit yourself to spectate [/B]

No, you didn't. you posted a couple of scenes and then proceeded to wildly speculate as to what they mean. that isn't providing proof. that speculating.

Originally posted by Silent Master
No, you didn't. you posted a couple of scenes and then proceeded to wildly speculate as to what they mean. that isn't providing proof. that speculating.

Read my previous replies. Clearly you missed a lot.

I clearly gave written material, and movie scenes to back up my claims.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Read my previous replies. Clearly you missed a lot.

I clearly gave written material, and movie scenes to back up my claims.

MvF's golden rule Movie feats only

As such, All you've provided is your speculation on what certain scenes mean. too bad for you, your speculation doesn't = proof.

Look what I have done!!

But, Thor won the MCU fight. But what does any of this crap have to do with the mcu?

Originally posted by Silent Master
MvF's golden rule Movie feats only

As such, All you've provided is your speculation on what certain scenes mean. too bad for you, your speculation doesn't = proof.

Rebuked.

Evidence is evidence. It means what it portrays.

And posted several other things.

But ofcourse a fanboy like you won't bother watching them or reading them. Putting you back into the ignore list.

Stop, you guys are ruining the thread. 5 pages later, agree to disagree.