Originally posted by RobtardYou have to prove Obi can hit him in the neck. Loki has survived far worse than a lightsaber. The durability feats have already been mentioned.
Keep lying and doing flips. "Episode 9"Proof that Loki could survive a lightsabre to the neck because of his "higher durability"?
A typo. Whooptydoo.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Cap would ko Obi with a shot.
The fact that you even think this, for one second, proves you either dont know a thing about Star Wars, or youre its biggest hater.
Not only would Cap NOT one-shot Kenobi of this Jedi Master level, but hw would actually not even beat him at all.
Then again, youre literally the worst, most aggreviating poster on this site, so like I said before, please continue to support Loki here, it only serves to make others side with Obi Wan. 🙂
Originally posted by DTMNo, it's the fact I call a spade a spade. His strength is night and day greater than Obi's durability. Watch Dooku ko him in rots. Pathetic.
The fact that you even think this, for one second, proves you either dont know a thing about Star Wars, or youre its biggest hater.Not only would Cap NOT one-shot Kenobi of this Jedi Master level, but hw would actually not even beat him at all.
Then again, youre literally the worst, most aggreviating poster on this site, so like I said before, please continue to support Loki here, it only serves to make others side with Obi Wan. 🙂
I agree people just go against me because they are emotionally compromised. They are weak and go off of bias and feelings. Thanks for complimenting me, loser.
Originally posted by quanchi112
You have to prove Obi can hit him in the neck. Loki has survived far worse than a lightsaber. The durability feats have already been mentioned.A typo. Whooptydoo.
You're trying to flip the burden of proof again because you can't debate well. You claimed Loki's durability would net him a win, that's the point you used. Prove Loki's durability could resist a lightsabre. Go on, prove it.
Protip: A typo is misspelling a word, like saying "Anarcky" instead of "Anarchy". You outright used a entirely different word. That's an error out of ignorance. YW.
Originally posted by quanchi112
That is you claiming so but based off what feats.
Well, power is a given, Kenobi could easily ragdoll Steve. He also has some nice speed and durability feats. And skill? Kenobi is noticeably more impressive. His fights against Maul, Grevious, and Anakin put him on another level.
Originally posted by RobtardYou scripted the fight., you made the claim so the onus is on you.
You're trying to flip the burden of proof again because you can't debate well. You claimed Loki's durability would net him a win, that's the point you used. Prove Loki's durability could resist a lightsabre. Go on, prove it.Protip: A typo is misspelling a word, like saying "Anarcky" instead of "Anarchy". You outright used a entirely different word. That's an error out of ignorance. YW.
His feats of durability are greater than a lightsaber. Bi frost, Thor's hammer, and hulk thrashing.
An autocorrect typo. iPad.
🙂
Do I have to remind you in every single post.
Originally posted by PsychotronWhy didn't he rag doll Jango with his force powers ? Or was he getting beaten up by a vastly weaker character than Steve.
Well, power is a given, Kenobi could easily ragdoll Steve. He also has some nice speed and durability feats. And skill? Kenobi is noticeably more impressive. His fights against Maul, Grevious, and Anakin put him on another level.
None of those characters possess Thor's skill or power. Maul also showed pre viszla was able to give him a very close battle despite the lack of force powers. Why didn't he rag doll him ?
Originally posted by quanchi112
You scripted the fight., you made the claim so the onus is on you.His feats of durability are greater than a lightsaber. Bi frost, Thor's hammer, and hulk thrashing.
An autocorrect typo. iPad.
🙂
Do I have to remind you in every single post.
I did not.
Do you not understand different damage types? Bifrost (one word, sport) explosion, getting hit by a hammer and getting slammed like some chump are not the same as super-concentrated heat.
You claimed Loki's durability would net him a win, that's the point you used. Prove Loki's durability can withstand a lightsabre. Go on, prove it.
Originally posted by RobtardYou said Obi hits his neck with the saber. That is scripting. You need to prove it. It auto separated them. Quit detracting from the overall point. That's more powerful than a light saber. A magical hammer and the bi frost explosion are more powerful than a light saber based off evidence.
I did not.Do you not understand different damage types? Bifrost (one word, sport) explosion, getting hit by a hammer and getting slammed like some chump are not the same as super-concentrated heat.
You claimed Loki's durability would net him a win, that's the point you used. Prove Loki's durability can withstand a lightsabre. Go on, prove it.
I just named greater feats you said nuh uh. That isn't debating.
Originally posted by quanchi112
You said Obi hits his neck with the saber. That is scripting. You need to prove it. It auto separated them. Quit detracting from the overall point. That's more powerful than a light saber. A magical hammer and the bi frost explosion are more powerful than a light saber based off evidence.I just named greater feats you said nuh uh. That isn't debating.
Incorrect: I said "Prove Loki could survive a lightsabre to the neck" after you claimed Loki's durability would net him a win.
Repeat: Not all damage is the same. Blunt force trauma from a hammer isn't the same as intensive heat. You need to prove Loki could survive a lightsabre. Go on, prove it.
eg IM's armor took hit's from Mjolnir, but melted when exposed to extreme heat. Means the armor has different levels of resistance to blunt force and heat. #gottem again
Originally posted by RobtardI do not have to. You need to prove he can hit him, I just cited greater durability feats. How intense is the heat ? Prove that a light saber is more powerful than. Mjolnir.
Incorrect: I said "Prove Loki could survive a lightsabre to the neck" after you claimed Loki's durability would net him a win.Repeat: Not all damage is the same. Blunt force trauma from a hammer isn't the same as intensive heat. You need to prove Loki could survive a lightsabre. Go on, prove it.
eg IM's armor took hit's from Mjolnir, but melted when exposed to extreme heat. Means the armor has different levels of resistance to blunt force and heat. #gottem again
He was amped. Was he amped when the suit melted during extreme heat. You'd need to prove lightsaber a are hotter than the extreme heat used. That's how debating works, kiddo.
Originally posted by quanchi112
I do not have to. You need to prove he can hit him, I just cited greater durability feats. How intense is the heat ? Prove that a light saber is more powerful than. Mjolnir.He was amped. Was he amped when the suit melted during extreme heat. You'd need to prove lightsaber a are hotter than the extreme heat used. That's how debating works, kiddo.
"Greater durability" doesn't mean "can't be hit", you don't even debate.
Repeat: Not all damage is the same. Blunt force trauma from a hammer isn't the same as intensive heat. You need to prove Loki could survive a lightsabre. Go on, prove it.
IM took a hit from the hammer before the lightning amp. Ignoring the obvious power amp =/= durability. You don't even Marvel either 😂