Originally posted by Bardock42
We are animals. Anything we do is behaving like animals.
Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
We are more advanced then other animals and have developed the ability to reason and determine right and wrong. We don't behave like animals, we have developed ethics and rules for livelihood.
We have, this is correct. Many people nowadays find it unethical to deny homosexual couples the right to have their relationship recognised. My ethics see absolutely nothing wrong with homosexual relationships at all, and I don't think that this makes me any less of an advanced animal than those who do (honestly, I feel superior to those people).
Originally posted by Time Immemorial
He looks happy
Sure, Hugh is massively happy and some would say he gets what he wants out of the relationships.
I was referring to the cases like Anna Nicole Smith who married a man 70+ years older and never lived with him, had sex with him and barely even kissed the man, but then wanted half of his 1.5+ billion estate when he died shortly after. Is that wrong?
Originally posted by Robtard
Sure, Hugh is massively happy and some would say he gets what he wants out of the relationships.I was referring to the cases like Anna Nicole Smith who married a man 70+ years older and never lived with him, had sex with him and barely even kissed the man, but then wanted half of his 1.5+ billion estate when he died shortly after.
You live in California as well, we live in the land of the weird and lost. Of coarse its wrong, but then again wrong doesn't make illegal, which is most of what people use now a days to circumvent the law. Plain and simple, there will be a reckoning.
Originally posted by Time Immemorial
You live in California as well, we live in the land of the weird and lost. Of coarse its wrong, but then again wrong doesn't make illegal, which is most of what people use now a days to circumvent the law. Plain and simple, there will be a reckoning.
Was just pointing out that the age abuse can go both ways, is all.