California outlaws Husband and Wife

Started by |King Joker|6 pages

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
It is stooping to the level of animals.

Humans should be more ethical and socially advanced then animals.

Originally posted by |King Joker|

So behaving like animals is ok?

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
So behaving like animals is ok?

We are animals. Anything we do is behaving like animals.

Originally posted by Bardock42
We are animals. Anything we do is behaving like animals.

We are more advanced then other animals and have developed the ability to reason and determine right and wrong. We don't behave like animals, we have developed ethics and rules for livelihood. Those who behave like animals, are not progressive, rather barbaric.

@TI: was just observing that you singled out teenage girls as immature instead of teenagers in general.

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
We are more advanced then other animals and have developed the ability to reason and determine right and wrong. We don't behave like animals, we have developed ethics and rules for livelihood.
Okay, what makes homosexuality ethically unsound?

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
We are more advanced then other animals and have developed the ability to reason and determine right and wrong. We don't behave like animals, we have developed ethics and rules for livelihood.

We have, this is correct. Many people nowadays find it unethical to deny homosexual couples the right to have their relationship recognised. My ethics see absolutely nothing wrong with homosexual relationships at all, and I don't think that this makes me any less of an advanced animal than those who do (honestly, I feel superior to those people).

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
@TI: was just observing that you singled out teenage girls as immature instead of teenagers in general.

That is for two reasons; a) he's sexist and b) he said it to take a dig at me, he's been on a "Bardock is a sexual predator" theme.

oh that. well, that fact has nothing to do with this topic, so i agree that it doesnt belong in this thread.

Originally posted by NemeBro
Okay, what makes homosexuality ethically unsound?

You're probably just asking to get scripture thrown back in your face

As long as two people are the right age, its fine, when its wrong is when someone is older taking advantage of someone that is younger.

What about a younger person taking advantage of an older person? Like the young trophy catch who marries the old decrepit partially senile person just for their money? It happens. See: Anna Nicole Smith

Originally posted by Robtard
What about a younger person taking advantage of an older person? Like the young trophy spouse who marries the old decrepit partially senile person just for their money? It happens.

He looks happy, but its gross.

you know who that is, right?

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
He looks happy

Sure, Hugh is massively happy and some would say he gets what he wants out of the relationships.

I was referring to the cases like Anna Nicole Smith who married a man 70+ years older and never lived with him, had sex with him and barely even kissed the man, but then wanted half of his 1.5+ billion estate when he died shortly after. Is that wrong?

Originally posted by Robtard
Sure, Hugh is massively happy and some would say he gets what he wants out of the relationships.

I was referring to the cases like Anna Nicole Smith who married a man 70+ years older and never lived with him, had sex with him and barely even kissed the man, but then wanted half of his 1.5+ billion estate when he died shortly after.

You live in California as well, we live in the land of the weird and lost. Of coarse its wrong, but then again wrong doesn't make illegal, which is most of what people use now a days to circumvent the law. Plain and simple, there will be a reckoning.

i highly doubt that hef is monogamous, either.

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
You live in California as well, we live in the land of the weird and lost. Of coarse its wrong, but then again wrong doesn't make illegal, which is most of what people use now a days to circumvent the law. Plain and simple, there will be a reckoning.

Was just pointing out that the age abuse can go both ways, is all.

He was complicit and so was she, and way over the age of 14.

A scumbag who would do that to 14 year old is way different.

You have the numbers a bit off, actually.