Khan vs John McClane

To make it fair:

John has the Booleg Gun

Khan has a stun gun.

McClane barely survives, he's stunned, has multiple broken bones and cuts and blood all over his torn shirt, he's exhausted and has a cig sticking out the corner of his mouth. Khan lies dead at his feet.

Khan, easily.

Originally posted by Nuke Nixon
McClane barely survives, he's stunned, has multiple broken bones and cuts and blood all over his torn shirt, he's exhausted and has a cig sticking out the corner of his mouth. Khan lies dead at his feet.

😆 😆

Best post ever made.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Khan, easily.

Soooo, the Boolen gun enables Khan to defeat the likes of Superman and Yoda, but John MacClane having the same gun doesnt allow him to defeat Khan?

Originally posted by DTM
Soooo, the Boolen gun enables Khan to defeat the likes of Superman and Yoda, but John MacClane having the same gun doesnt allow him to defeat Khan?

Finally a match Khan will win.

Originally posted by DTM
Soooo, the Boolen gun enables Khan to defeat the likes of Superman and Yoda, but John MacClane having the same gun doesnt allow him to defeat Khan?

Lol, it's hilarious how he flips all the time like that because of his bias and complete lack of objectivity.

Originally posted by Robtard
Lol, it's hilarious how he flips all the time like that because of his bias and complete lack of objectivity.

Khan curb stomps.

A bootleg vs Stun gun, you smoke crack on a daily basis?

Originally posted by quanchi112
John isn't as accurate, as strong, or have any experience with the Boolean gun. It wasn't just the Boolean gun it was Khan wielding the Boolean gun. Don't get it twisted, sport.

a boolean gun is a light weight weapon

Originally posted by Genesis-Soldier
a boolean gun is a light weight weapon

Seems you're not only ignorant of everything Star Trek prior to Abram's films, but ignorant of Abram's films as well. HYG:

"Despite its size, the weapon could be operated with a single hand and was carried with a shoulder strap."

Originally posted by Robtard
Seems you're not only ignorant of everything Star Trek prior to Abram's films, but ignorant of Abram's films as well. HYG:

"Despite its size, the weapon could be operated with a single hand and was carried with a shoulder strap."

I understand the Into Darkness novel is probably not relevant to this forum, but on that very same page...

In the novelization of Star Trek Into Darkness, the weapon was also not given a specific official name, but it was referred to as a power rifle. It was, according to the novel, designed to be mounted on a tripod and manipulated by two or more people. The fact that Khan could wield it with precision and as effortlessly as a light pistol was due to his strength and abilities as an augment.

Books don't count here, correct.

So because a guy who is a super soldier within the context of the movie wields it with one hand, John McClane can?

I think it's pretty clear it's not a lightweight weapon but whatever, I'm not much fussed.

If it helps you feel better about the "no books" rule, McClane has shown super-strength in times of need. McClane can also opt to use it with two-hands, for better accuracy.

I guess you missed the second part of the last sentence.

I didn't, I was trying to help you with your fuss, even if it isn't too much.