Khan vs John McClane

Started by Robtard4 pages

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
The love in this thread makes me happy.

Put your boner away, weirdo

I like how thedkeffect's argument is basically, my biased opinion trumps your valid evidence source.

Originally posted by Silent Master
I like how thedkeffect's argument is basically, my biased opinion trumps your valid evidence source.

Would you expect any less, he has always made unsupported claims and then used said claim as proof when asked for proof.

Originally posted by Robtard
You dodged and keep dodging, let's start with just one:

"Bulkier" doesn't automatically mean something is heavy as you claimed. So that's another failed argument. Prove the gun is too heavy for someone like McClane to use. Post proof, or this is just another unsupported claim of yours.

Support your claim, don't dodge as you have been

And again for the rage looper known as Roberta.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I said Khan used the gun and used it to take someone out. I said he tossed it aside as he went mobile. I said he had a shoulder strap which carried this heavier, bulkier weapon.

Someone else said the weapon could be operated with a single hand. Guess what the only person who did so had super strength.

Find the guy who edited that because you can't think for yourself and think a wiki entry based off a scene is evidence. At least he can think for himself while you quote another man to fight your battles once again.

😂 😂

I wish the Wiki editor knew you chose him as your brain.

Anyhow, I supported (page 1,2 and 3) my claim that McClane (who has both hands free) could use/fire the Boolean gun, all you've done is make unsupported claims and danced/dodged when asked to provide proof, as per the trolling MO you're well known for in KMC.

So McClane uses the vastly superior firepower and range the boolean gun provides him over Khan's stun-gun and shoots Khan dead. Now do your thing again.

Originally posted by Robtard
Anyhow, I supported (page 1,2 and 3) my claim that McClane (who has both hands free) could use/fire the Boolean gun, all you've done is make unsupported claims and danced/dodged when asked to provide proof, as per the trolling MO you're well known for in KMC.

So McClane uses the vastly superior firepower and range the boolean gun provides him over Khan's stun-gun and shoots Khan dead. Now do your thing again.

Not with the accuracy or strength of Khan. You didn't support the gun is light and easy to use since Khan is the only one to use it and since he has super strength.

You cited wiki which is another person's take on the film as evidence this proving you can't debate for shit on your own.

😂 😆 😂 🤣 😂

Just as predicted, you did your thing.

Anyhow, my claim was: "McClane can use the Boolean gun, he even has both hands free here"

I used Wiki to support that, Wiki is allowed in here as per the MVF rules (read them). So once again you lost, have nothing and are trolling as per your usual MO. Now do your thing again.

Originally posted by Robtard
Just as predicted, you did your thing.

Anyhow, my claim was: "McClane can use the Boolean gun, he even has both hands free here"

I used Wiki to support that, Wiki is allowed in here as per the MVF rules (read them). So once again you lost, have nothing and are trolling as per your usual MO. Now do your thing again.

I never said he can't use the gun I said he can't use it with the same skill and ease that Khan did.

Khan is faster and your article supports only Khan using it since he's the only one who wielded it. Another person edited the wiki and I'd rather talk to him as he can clearly form an argument but you can't.

More flips and now you're talking about some ridiculous conspiracy editing job against Abram's Khan. Grow up.

Originally posted by Robtard
More flips and now you're talking about some ridiculous conspiracy editing job against Abram's Khan. Grow up.
Someone else edited it but that does t change the fact the only guy who wielded it had super strength. John isn't anywhere near as strong as Khan and isn't as accurate either. Khan wins, easily.

Khan gets Bolostomped

McClane wins... he always wins, unlike Khan

McClane goes absolutely mental and puts holes in khans broken body

nuff said

Originally posted by Tattoos N Scars
Khan gets Bolostomped
Based on ?

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
McClane wins... he always wins, unlike Khan
Based on ?

Originally posted by Genesis-Soldier
McClane goes absolutely mental and puts holes in khans broken body

nuff said

Khan wins, easily.

Subtract the last McClane movie, i would be arguing in his defense. Just because of the lastm Die hard movie, i'm arguing in Spite of him.

Originally posted by Silent Master
I like how thedkeffect's argument is basically, my biased opinion trumps your valid evidence source.
??

What is the environment they're fighting in?

Originally posted by jinXed by JaNx
What is the environment they're fighting in?
Khan wins no matter the environment.