Khan vs John McClane

Quan doesn't cite proof and still hasn't learned that using Wiki as support is in the MVF rules

HYG again, since you're just dancing and dodging:

Claiming you "cited facts" without posting proof to support said facts isn't a valid argument.

You basically said: "Khan used the gun and he has super-strength, so that means super-strength is needed to use the gun". That's a faulty argument and little more than fanboy wanking.

Valid Proof: "Despite its size, the weapon could be operated with a single hand and was carried with a shoulder strap" -Sourced above.

Now either counter my valid proof with valid proof or be known as the one who concedes.

Originally posted by Robtard
Quan doesn't cite proof and still hasn't learned that using Wiki as support is in the MVF rules

HYG again, since you're just dancing and dodging:

Claiming you "cited facts" without posting proof to support said facts isn't a valid argument.

You basically said: "Khan used the gun and he has super-strength, so that means super-strength is needed to use the gun". That's a faulty argument and little more than fanboy wanking.

Valid Proof: "Despite its size, the weapon could be operated with a single hand and was carried with a shoulder strap" -Sourced above.

Now either counter my valid proof with valid proof or be known as the one who concedes.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I said Khan used the gun and used it to take someone out. I said he tossed it aside as he went mobile. I said he had a shoulder strap which carried this heavier, bulkier weapon.

Someone else said the weapon could be operated with a single hand. Guess what the only person who did so had super strength.

Find the guy who edited that because you can't think for yourself and think a wiki entry based off a scene is evidence. At least he can think for himself while you quote another man to fight your battles once again.

😂 😂

Ask that other guy out on a date.

Quan doesn't cite proof and still hasn't learned that using Wiki as support is in the MVF rules

HYG again, since you're just dancing and dodging:

Claiming you "cited facts" without posting proof to support said facts isn't a valid argument.

You basically said: "Khan used the gun and he has super-strength, so that means super-strength is needed to use the gun". That's a faulty argument and little more than fanboy wanking.

Valid Proof: "Despite its size, the weapon could be operated with a single hand and was carried with a shoulder strap" -Sourced above.

Now either counter my valid proof with valid proof or be known as the one who concedes.

Originally posted by Robtard
Quan doesn't cite proof and still hasn't learned that using Wiki as support is in the MVF rules

HYG again, since you're just dancing and dodging:

Claiming you "cited facts" without posting proof to support said facts isn't a valid argument.

You basically said: "Khan used the gun and he has super-strength, so that means super-strength is needed to use the gun". That's a faulty argument and little more than fanboy wanking.

Valid Proof: "Despite its size, the weapon could be operated with a single hand and was carried with a shoulder strap" -Sourced above.

Now either counter my valid proof with valid proof or be known as the one who concedes.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I said Khan used the gun and used it to take someone out. I said he tossed it aside as he went mobile. I said he had a shoulder strap which carried this heavier, bulkier weapon.

Someone else said the weapon could be operated with a single hand. Guess what the only person who did so had super strength.

Find the guy who edited that because you can't think for yourself and think a wiki entry based off a scene is evidence. At least he can think for himself while you quote another man to fight your battles once again.

😂 😂

Quan doesn't cite proof and still hasn't learned that using Wiki as support is in the MVF rules

HYG again, since you're just dancing and dodging:

Claiming you "cited facts" without posting proof to support said "facts" isn't a valid argument.

You basically said: "Khan used the gun and he has super-strength, so that means super-strength is needed to use the gun". That's a faulty argument and little more than fanboy wanking.

Valid Proof: "Despite its size, the weapon could be operated with a single hand and was carried with a shoulder strap" -Sourced above.

Now either counter my valid proof with valid proof or be known as the one who concedes.

The love in this thread makes me happy.

Originally posted by Robtard
Quan doesn't cite proof and still hasn't learned that using Wiki as support is in the MVF rules

HYG again, since you're just dancing and dodging:

Claiming you "cited facts" without posting proof to support said "facts" isn't a valid argument.

You basically said: "Khan used the gun and he has super-strength, so that means super-strength is needed to use the gun". That's a faulty argument and little more than fanboy wanking.

Valid Proof: "Despite its size, the weapon could be operated with a single hand and was carried with a shoulder strap" -Sourced above.

Now either counter my valid proof with valid proof or be known as the one who concedes.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I said Khan used the gun and used it to take someone out. I said he tossed it aside as he went mobile. I said he had a shoulder strap which carried this heavier, bulkier weapon.

Someone else said the weapon could be operated with a single hand. Guess what the only person who did so had super strength.

Find the guy who edited that because you can't think for yourself and think a wiki entry based off a scene is evidence. At least he can think for himself while you quote another man to fight your battles once again.

😂 😂

"Bulkier" doesn't automatically mean something is heavy as you claimed. So that's another failed argument. Prove the gun is too heavy for someone like McClane to use. Post proof, or this is just another unsupported claim of yours.

Until then, this destroys you:

You basically said: "Khan used the gun and he has super-strength, so that means super-strength is needed to use the gun". That's a faulty argument and little more than fanboy wanking.

Valid Proof: "Despite its size, the weapon could be operated with a single hand and was carried with a shoulder strap" -Sourced above.

Now either counter my valid proof with valid proof or be known as the one who concedes.

Originally posted by Robtard
"Bulkier" doesn't automatically mean something is heavy as you claimed. So that's another failed argument. Prove the gun is too heavy for someone like McClane to use. Post proof, or this is just another unsupported claim of yours.

Until then, this destroys you:

You basically said: "Khan used the gun and he has super-strength, so that means super-strength is needed to use the gun". That's a faulty argument and little more than fanboy wanking.

Valid Proof: "Despite its size, the weapon could be operated with a single hand and was carried with a shoulder strap" -Sourced above.

Now either counter my valid proof with valid proof or be known as the one who concedes.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I said Khan used the gun and used it to take someone out. I said he tossed it aside as he went mobile. I said he had a shoulder strap which carried this heavier, bulkier weapon.

Someone else said the weapon could be operated with a single hand. Guess what the only person who did so had super strength.

Find the guy who edited that because you can't think for yourself and think a wiki entry based off a scene is evidence. At least he can think for himself while you quote another man to fight your battles once again.

😂 😂

Quan doesn't cite proof and still hasn't learned that using Wiki as support is in the MVF rules

"Bulkier" doesn't automatically mean something is heavy as you claimed. So that's another failed argument. Prove the gun is too heavy for someone like McClane to use. Post proof, or this is just another unsupported claim of yours.

Until then, this destroys you:

You basically said: "Khan used the gun and he has super-strength, so that means super-strength is needed to use the gun". That's a faulty argument and little more than fanboy wanking.

Valid Proof: "Despite its size, the weapon could be operated with a single hand and was carried with a shoulder strap" -Sourced above.

Now either counter my valid proof with valid proof or be known as the one who concedes.

Originally posted by Robtard
Quan doesn't cite proof and still hasn't learned that using Wiki as support is in the MVF rules

"Bulkier" doesn't automatically mean something is heavy as you claimed. So that's another failed argument. Prove the gun is too heavy for someone like McClane to use. Post proof, or this is just another unsupported claim of yours.

Until then, this destroys you:

You basically said: "Khan used the gun and he has super-strength, so that means super-strength is needed to use the gun". That's a faulty argument and little more than fanboy wanking.

Valid Proof: "Despite its size, the weapon could be operated with a single hand and was carried with a shoulder strap" -Sourced above.

Now either counter my valid proof with valid proof or be known as the one who concedes.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I said Khan used the gun and used it to take someone out. I said he tossed it aside as he went mobile. I said he had a shoulder strap which carried this heavier, bulkier weapon.

Someone else said the weapon could be operated with a single hand. Guess what the only person who did so had super strength.

Find the guy who edited that because you can't think for yourself and think a wiki entry based off a scene is evidence. At least he can think for himself while you quote another man to fight your battles once again.

😂 😂

Quan doesn't cite proof and still hasn't learned that using Wiki as support is in the MVF rules

"Bulkier" doesn't automatically mean something is heavy as you claimed. So that's another failed argument. Prove the gun is too heavy for someone like McClane to use. Post proof, or this is just another unsupported claim of yours.

Until then, this destroys you:

You basically said: "Khan used the gun and he has super-strength, so that means super-strength is needed to use the gun". That's a faulty argument and little more than fanboy wanking.

Valid Proof: "Despite its size, the weapon could be operated with a single hand and was carried with a shoulder strap" -Sourced above.

Now either counter my valid proof with valid proof or be known as the one who concedes.

Originally posted by Robtard
Quan doesn't cite proof and still hasn't learned that using Wiki as support is in the MVF rules

"Bulkier" doesn't automatically mean something is heavy as you claimed. So that's another failed argument. Prove the gun is too heavy for someone like McClane to use. Post proof, or this is just another unsupported claim of yours.

Until then, this destroys you:

You basically said: "Khan used the gun and he has super-strength, so that means super-strength is needed to use the gun". That's a faulty argument and little more than fanboy wanking.

Valid Proof: "Despite its size, the weapon could be operated with a single hand and was carried with a shoulder strap" -Sourced above.

Now either counter my valid proof with valid proof or be known as the one who concedes.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I said Khan used the gun and used it to take someone out. I said he tossed it aside as he went mobile. I said he had a shoulder strap which carried this heavier, bulkier weapon.

Someone else said the weapon could be operated with a single hand. Guess what the only person who did so had super strength.

Find the guy who edited that because you can't think for yourself and think a wiki entry based off a scene is evidence. At least he can think for himself while you quote another man to fight your battles once again.

😂 😂

Quan doesn't cite proof and still hasn't learned that using Wiki as support is in the MVF rules

"Bulkier" doesn't automatically mean something is heavy as you claimed. So that's another failed argument. Prove the gun is too heavy for someone like McClane to use. Post proof, or this is just another unsupported claim of yours.

Until then, this destroys you:

You basically said: "Khan used the gun and he has super-strength, so that means super-strength is needed to use the gun". That's a faulty argument and little more than fanboy wanking.

Valid Proof: "Despite its size, the weapon could be operated with a single hand and was carried with a shoulder strap" -Sourced above.

Now either counter my valid proof with valid proof or be known as the one who concedes.

Originally posted by Robtard
Quan doesn't cite proof and still hasn't learned that using Wiki as support is in the MVF rules

"Bulkier" doesn't automatically mean something is heavy as you claimed. So that's another failed argument. Prove the gun is too heavy for someone like McClane to use. Post proof, or this is just another unsupported claim of yours.

Until then, this destroys you:

You basically said: "Khan used the gun and he has super-strength, so that means super-strength is needed to use the gun". That's a faulty argument and little more than fanboy wanking.

Valid Proof: "Despite its size, the weapon could be operated with a single hand and was carried with a shoulder strap" -Sourced above.

Now either counter my valid proof with valid proof or be known as the one who concedes.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I said Khan used the gun and used it to take someone out. I said he tossed it aside as he went mobile. I said he had a shoulder strap which carried this heavier, bulkier weapon.

Someone else said the weapon could be operated with a single hand. Guess what the only person who did so had super strength.

Find the guy who edited that because you can't think for yourself and think a wiki entry based off a scene is evidence. At least he can think for himself while you quote another man to fight your battles once again.

😂 😂

Quan doesn't cite proof and still hasn't learned that using Wiki as support is in the MVF rules

"Bulkier" doesn't automatically mean something is heavy as you claimed. So that's another failed argument. Prove the gun is too heavy for someone like McClane to use. Post proof, or this is just another unsupported claim of yours. <--- keep dodging this

Until then, this destroys you:

You basically said: "Khan used the gun and he has super-strength, so that means super-strength is needed to use the gun". That's a faulty argument and little more than fanboy wanking.

Valid Proof: "Despite its size, the weapon could be operated with a single hand and was carried with a shoulder strap" -Sourced above.

Now either counter my valid proof with valid proof or be known as the one who concedes.

Originally posted by Robtard
Quan doesn't cite proof and still hasn't learned that using Wiki as support is in the MVF rules

"Bulkier" doesn't automatically mean something is heavy as you claimed. So that's another failed argument. Prove the gun is too heavy for someone like McClane to use. Post proof, or this is just another unsupported claim of yours. <--- keep dodging this

Until then, this destroys you:

You basically said: "Khan used the gun and he has super-strength, so that means super-strength is needed to use the gun". That's a faulty argument and little more than fanboy wanking.

Valid Proof: "Despite its size, the weapon could be operated with a single hand and was carried with a shoulder strap" -Sourced above.

Now either counter my valid proof with valid proof or be known as the one who concedes.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I said Khan used the gun and used it to take someone out. I said he tossed it aside as he went mobile. I said he had a shoulder strap which carried this heavier, bulkier weapon.

Someone else said the weapon could be operated with a single hand. Guess what the only person who did so had super strength.

Find the guy who edited that because you can't think for yourself and think a wiki entry based off a scene is evidence. At least he can think for himself while you quote another man to fight your battles once again.

😂 😂

You dodged and keep dodging, let's start with just one:

"Bulkier" doesn't automatically mean something is heavy as you claimed. So that's another failed argument. Prove the gun is too heavy for someone like McClane to use. Post proof, or this is just another unsupported claim of yours.

Support your claim, don't dodge as you have been

Originally posted by Robtard
You dodged and keep dodging, let's start with just one:

"Bulkier" doesn't automatically mean something is heavy as you claimed. So that's another failed argument. Prove the gun is too heavy for someone like McClane to use. Post proof, or this is just another unsupported claim of yours.

Support your claim, don't dodge as you have been

Originally posted by quanchi112
I said Khan used the gun and used it to take someone out. I said he tossed it aside as he went mobile. I said he had a shoulder strap which carried this heavier, bulkier weapon.

Someone else said the weapon could be operated with a single hand. Guess what the only person who did so had super strength.

Find the guy who edited that because you can't think for yourself and think a wiki entry based off a scene is evidence. At least he can think for himself while you quote another man to fight your battles once again.

😂 😂

You dodged and keep dodging, let's start with just one:

"Bulkier" doesn't automatically mean something is heavy as you claimed. So that's another failed argument. Prove the gun is too heavy for someone like McClane to use. Post proof, or this is just another unsupported claim of yours.

Support your claim, don't dodge as you have been