Originally posted by RobtardWe see it operated by a single hand whose hand was Khan's. He's the same guy whose hands crushed a human skull. 😂
Seems you're not only ignorant of everything Star Trek prior to Abram's films, but ignorant of Abram's films as well. HYG:
Show anyone else wielding it. 😂
It's obvious when this cannon took someone out running at Khan it isn't lightweight. I mean FFS you're retarded. 😂
"Despite its size, the weapon could be operated with a single hand and was carried with a shouldeR strap"
Originally posted by RobtardWe see the size of the cannon, the fact it's used via a strap, it took someone out and he discards it when he wants to go mobile. Khan has super strength so you can't ignore the only guy to use it and pretend anyone else can with the same ease and skill unless you prove it.
We see Khan do a lot of things; we dont just assume they all require super-strength to do, that's being a silly fanboy. So show valid proof of your claims, that super-strength is required to fire a boolean gun. Show it like I did or concede again.
You also double post spammed. You're upset and massively retarded.
Originally posted by quanchi112
We see the size of the cannon, the fact it's used via a strap, it took someone out and he discards it when he wants to go mobile. Khan has super strength so you can't ignore the only guy to use it and pretend anyone else can with the same ease and skill unless you prove it.You also double post spammed. You're upset and massively retarded.
Saying "Khan used it so it means the user must have super-strength" isn't a valid argument. Khan also used a rifle, that doesn't mean that only Khan can use that rifle as shown. Sorry, sporto.
I posted valid proof and sourced it: "Despite its size, the weapon could be operated with a single hand and was carried with a shoulder strap"
Either counter it with valid proof or concede, that's how debates work. Your flaming means you know you lost, it's a desperate distraction tactic of yours.
Valid proof > your unsupported fanboy claims.
Originally posted by RobtardI didn't cite that as the only reason. Khan went mobile with the rifle but he discarded the phaser cannon. Hint, nont.
Saying "Khan used it so it means the user must have super-strength" isn't a valid argument. Khan also used a rifle, that doesn't mean that only Khan can use that rifle as shown. Sorry, sporto.I posted valid proof and sourced it: "Despite its size, the weapon could be operated with a single hand and was carried with a shoulder strap"
Either counter it with valid proof or concede, that's how debates work. Your flaming means you know you lost, it's a desperate distraction tactic of yours.
Valid proof > your unsupported fanboy claims.
That was someone's opinion watching the film because we only see Khan using it. I cited film knowledge and logic to come to the best choose.
I cited the film directly you cited someone else's opinion on the film not even your own. Think for yourself, scrub.
😂
You didn't cite the film, you cited your own biased fanboy views on what you saw.
Your inability to show valid proof means you concede.
Valid Proof: "Despite its size, the weapon could be operated with a single hand and was carried with a shoulder strap" -Sourced above.
Now either counter my valid proof with valid proof or be known as the one who concedes.
Originally posted by RobtardI cited facts from the film using logic. You cited someone else's wiki while ignoring the only guy who wielded the Boolean gun has super strength.
You didn't cite the film, you cited your own biased fanboy views on what you saw.Your inability to show valid proof means you concede.
Valid Proof: "Despite its size, the weapon could be operated with a single hand and was carried with a shoulder strap" -Sourced above.
Now either counter my valid proof with valid proof or be known as the one who concedes.
It was wielded by Khan. 🙂
We see him knock someone down with it and it didn't move lightning fast and knocked some Kling down for the count. That's a heavy weapon as simpleton can tell that but go quote someone else to argue for you. You're a joke.
😂
Claiming you "cited facts" without posting proof to support said facts isn't a valid argument.
You basically said: "Khan used the gun and he has super-strength, so that means super-strength is needed to use the gun". That's a faulty argument and little more than fanboy wanking.
Valid Proof: "Despite its size, the weapon could be operated with a single hand and was carried with a shoulder strap" -Sourced above.
Now either counter my valid proof with valid proof or be known as the one who concedes.
Originally posted by RobtardI said Khan used the gun and used it to take someone out. I said he tossed it aside as he went mobile. I said he had a shoulder strap which carried this heavier, bulkier weapon.
Claiming you "cited facts" without posting proof to support said facts isn't a valid argument.You basically said: "Khan used the gun and he has super-strength, so that means super-strength is needed to use the gun". That's a faulty argument and little more than fanboy wanking.
Valid Proof: "Despite its size, the weapon could be operated with a single hand and was carried with a shoulder strap" -Sourced above.
Now either counter my valid proof with valid proof or be known as the one who concedes.
Someone else said the weapon could be operated with a single hand. Guess what the only person who did so had super strength.
Find the guy who edited that because you can't think for yourself and think a wiki entry based off a scene is evidence. At least he can think for himself while you quote another man to fight your battles once again.
😂 😂
HYG again, since you're just dancing and dodging:
Claiming you "cited facts" without posting proof to support said facts isn't a valid argument.
You basically said: "Khan used the gun and he has super-strength, so that means super-strength is needed to use the gun". That's a faulty argument and little more than fanboy wanking.
Valid Proof: "Despite its size, the weapon could be operated with a single hand and was carried with a shoulder strap" -Sourced above.
Now either counter my valid proof with valid proof or be known as the one who concedes.
Originally posted by Robtard
HYG again:Claiming you "cited facts" without posting proof to support said facts isn't a valid argument.
You basically said: "Khan used the gun and he has super-strength, so that means super-strength is needed to use the gun". That's a faulty argument and little more than fanboy wanking.
Valid Proof: "Despite its size, the weapon could be operated with a single hand and was carried with a shoulder strap" -Sourced above.
Now either counter my valid proof with valid proof or be known as the one who concedes.
Originally posted by quanchi112Rage loop and this time it's even worse as Robbie is quoting another man to fight his battles since he can't think for himself.
I said Khan used the gun and used it to take someone out. I said he tossed it aside as he went mobile. I said he had a shoulder strap which carried this heavier, bulkier weapon.Someone else said the weapon could be operated with a single hand. Guess what the only person who did so had super strength.
Find the guy who edited that because you can't think for yourself and think a wiki entry based off a scene is evidence. At least he can think for himself while you quote another man to fight your battles once again.
😂 😂
"irony"
HYG again, since you're just dancing and dodging:
Claiming you "cited facts" without posting proof to support said facts isn't a valid argument.
You basically said: "Khan used the gun and he has super-strength, so that means super-strength is needed to use the gun". That's a faulty argument and little more than fanboy wanking.
Valid Proof: "Despite its size, the weapon could be operated with a single hand and was carried with a shoulder strap" -Sourced above.
Now either counter my valid proof with valid proof or be known as the one who concedes.
Originally posted by Robtard
"irony"HYG again, since you're just dancing and dodging:
Claiming you "cited facts" without posting proof to support said facts isn't a valid argument.
You basically said: "Khan used the gun and he has super-strength, so that means super-strength is needed to use the gun". That's a faulty argument and little more than fanboy wanking.
Valid Proof: "Despite its size, the weapon could be operated with a single hand and was carried with a shoulder strap" -Sourced above.
Now either counter my valid proof with valid proof or be known as the one who concedes.
Originally posted by quanchi112Rage loop but the opinion portion is by someone else who can form an opinion unlike you.
I said Khan used the gun and used it to take someone out. I said he tossed it aside as he went mobile. I said he had a shoulder strap which carried this heavier, bulkier weapon.Someone else said the weapon could be operated with a single hand. Guess what the only person who did so had super strength.
Find the guy who edited that because you can't think for yourself and think a wiki entry based off a scene is evidence. At least he can think for himself while you quote another man to fight your battles once again.
😂 😂
"irony"
HYG again, since you're just dancing and dodging:
Claiming you "cited facts" without posting proof to support said facts isn't a valid argument.
You basically said: "Khan used the gun and he has super-strength, so that means super-strength is needed to use the gun". That's a faulty argument and little more than fanboy wanking.
Valid Proof: "Despite its size, the weapon could be operated with a single hand and was carried with a shoulder strap" -Sourced above.
Now either counter my valid proof with valid proof or be known as the one who concedes.
Originally posted by Robtard
"irony"HYG again, since you're just dancing and dodging:
Claiming you "cited facts" without posting proof to support said facts isn't a valid argument.
You basically said: "Khan used the gun and he has super-strength, so that means super-strength is needed to use the gun". That's a faulty argument and little more than fanboy wanking.
Valid Proof: "Despite its size, the weapon could be operated with a single hand and was carried with a shoulder strap" -Sourced above.
Now either counter my valid proof with valid proof or be known as the one who concedes.
Originally posted by quanchi112Robbie again cites wiki and can't think his way out of a paper bag.
I said Khan used the gun and used it to take someone out. I said he tossed it aside as he went mobile. I said he had a shoulder strap which carried this heavier, bulkier weapon.Someone else said the weapon could be operated with a single hand. Guess what the only person who did so had super strength.
Find the guy who edited that because you can't think for yourself and think a wiki entry based off a scene is evidence. At least he can think for himself while you quote another man to fight your battles once again.
😂 😂