General Primary Discussion Thread

So you didn't have faith in him then, but now suddenly you do because its looking like she is going to lose?

It's still Clinton's nomination to lose.

To use a football analogy, it's as if Clinton was up by three touchdowns at the end of the first quarter, and now we're into the third quarter and she's only up by a field goal and a safety. It's closer, the opposition is doing much better than anticipated, but she's still leading.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
So you didn't have faith in him then, but now suddenly you do because its looking like she is going to lose?

It's looking better for Sanders now than before, but Clinton's not out, not even remotely.

Or just read what I'm saying and don't put your own thoughts into it.

Its a dead locked tie, so it is remotely close she could lose.

You spend so much time here defending her against all of her criminal activity, that you can't see clearly or give Sanders the nod.

Even if it's a 50/50 (which it isn't), that's still Clinton not being close to out, as it could equally go for either.

She's still leading Sanders by nearly 15pts: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/2016_democratic_presidential_nomination-3824.html

So to recap, Sanders is doing much better, but Clinton's nowhere near being done here.

As for the personal attack, let me retort in kind: you spend more time here talking about Clinton than anyone else, so maybe you're her biggest fan.

I think if Bernie wins Iowa and N.H. it'd give him sufficient momentum to overtake her nationally.

"The key for both Trump and Sanders is first-time caucus goers:
Trump leads Cruz 40 - 22 percent among these first-timers, while Republicans who attended prior caucuses go 26 percent for Cruz and 25 percent for Trump;

Sanders tops Clinton 62 - 35 percent among Democratic first-timers, while Clinton leads 52 - 41 percent among voters who attended prior caucuses;
44 percent of Republicans and 38 percent of Democrats say this is their first caucus."

http://www.quinnipiac.edu/news-and-events/quinnipiac-university-poll/iowa/release-detail?ReleaseID=2320

Originally posted by Robtard
Even if it's a 50/50 (which it isn't), that's still Clinton not being close to out, as it could equally go for either.

She's still leading Sanders by nearly 15pts: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/2016_democratic_presidential_nomination-3824.html

So to recap, Sanders is doing much better, but Clinton's
nowhere near being done here.

As for the personal attack, let me retort in kind: you spend more time here talking about Clinton than anyone else, so maybe you're her biggest fan.

And no shes not leading him by 15 points, its by 4 points

From your own source

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/ia/iowa_democratic_presidential_caucus-3195.html

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
And no shes not leading him by 15 points, its by 4 points

From your own source

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/ia/iowa_democratic_presidential_caucus-3195.html

That's just for Iowa, I posted nationally. There she's still about 15pts ahead of Sanders.

So your trying to marginalize his very likely first win in Iowa tonight, and then he wins in NH, and then its over for her, and her political protection will evaporate and an indictment will come. Just admit its over for her.

Again, it's nearly impossible to have a decent convo when you just twist everything. I didn't "marginalize" anything and the only thing I mentioned about Iowa was that I wasn't talking about Iowa with my link.

You really wanting her to be done and out won't make it a reality, she's very much alive in this election. Sanders has a tooth and nail fight ahead of him.

So your going by national polls, funny you don't want to talk about the Iowa caucus tonight, which she has a strong possibility of losing. And lets say she does win, Iowa has never picked the democratic nominee in 16 years of elections. So if she does win, marginally, a week from now people will have forgotten and Bernie will utterly destroy her in NH, and thats when he picks up serious momentum.

I think you just answered your own question there by showing that Iowa hasn't predicted the D-nom in 16 elections (is it really that much?).

Edit: Here's what I found concerning Iowa http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/03/past-iowa-caucus-winners_n_1182148.html

Still hope Sanders takes it, even if the people of Iowa are not experts at predicting the Democratic nom.

Ok so I hope Hilary wins Iowa😂

But you assume the American people are not sick and tired of all this bullshit and want to burn it all down and start over like Trump and Sanders want to do.

I could see Trump making Bernie VP is he loses to Hilary😂

That would be an auto win for trump against Hilary in the primary.

"Seven democrats in 10 caucuses who won in Iowa have ended up winning their party's nomination, according to the Des Moines Register. (Two were incumbents who ran unopposed.)"

You want Sanders to win, even if Iowa doesn't predict much, it still can't hurt.

Anyone with half a brain wants Sanders to win over her.

A career criminal vs a grass roots movement leader with a honorable voting record on guns and the VA and veterans efforts.

YouTube video

Sniper Fire😂

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Anyone with half a brain wants Sanders to win over her.

A career criminal vs a grass roots movement leader with a honorable voting record on guns and the VA and veterans efforts.

#HillaryForPrison2016 😂

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
YouTube video

Sniper Fire😂

Love it 👆

Hillary's dream: "I was under sniper fire when I arrived in Bosnia"

Reality: "Arriving in Bosnia, Hillary strolls around smiling as people greet her with flowers"

😂

Q99's response will be "well look at the lies of Trump." Unless she can someone change and reverse hilarious on words and the actual facts.

😂

Did you hear about her saying she tried to join the marines😂