Originally posted by BackFire
Yeah, Trump is pretty close to 20. Sanders at about 15 right now. Would like to see Sanders go up more.Also surprising to see Carson in dead last.
I see conflicting reports, here http://www.decisiondeskhq.com Sanders is at 19.4 pp ahead, with 36000 votes counted.
Micah Cohen: "Vermin Supreme is doing better than Jim Gilmore"
He promises every American a pony.
Originally posted by BackFire
I liked his smashing of Rubio.Other than that, not really. But I don't like any of the Republicans so when it comes to primaries I'm not the best to ask.
If I was forced to choose any of the republican candidates to be president, I'd probably choose Trump or Kasich.
Christie has a strong democratic record in his state though. Even if he says he's republican.
Yea. It's probably the best he'll perform, but he gets his moment!
On the Dem results-
"Perhaps it shouldn’t be too surprising given Sanders’s lack of history with the Democratic Party, but he is doing far better with undeclared voters than he is with registered Democrats. Although he leads 72 percent to 27 percent over Clinton among undeclared voters, Sanders is tied with Clinton at 49 percent among registered Democrats. That could paint trouble for Sanders in closed primaries, when only registered Democrats can vote."-Harry Enten
Which is quite interesting.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
The media hates Carson..I feel horrible for him.
The issue is he's a brilliant neurosurgeon who didn't do much research in politics when trying to run for President (had the lowest factual accuracy of any candidate by fact-checking), and his campaign managers repeatedly reported he would ignore them and do his own thing.
It's impressive he got as far as he did. Neurosurgeon and president are not jobs with a lot of skill overlap.
More from the liveblog
David Wasserman: "Surprise, surprise: Some of Clinton’s best towns (perhaps more accurate: least worst towns) tonight were some of her weakest towns in 2008. It looks like she’s taken 46 percent in Exeter, 43 percent in Portsmouth and 43 percent in Concord. Most surprisingly, there’s even one report she took 47 percent in Hanover, home to Dartmouth College (this has not yet been reported by the AP). Clinton appears to be doing better with academic types in New Hampshire this time, but has cratered with rural and blue collar Democrats."
Harry Enten: "David, I dare say Clinton’s coalition is starting to look a little bit like Obama’s. That is, wealthier white voters and black voters. If, however, Clinton loses black voters to Sanders, then she’s in a world of trouble. There’s no sign she’s losing those voters yet, though."
Interesting how Hillary's coalition has switched. I guess her time with Obama played a large role, and Sanders is hitting some people Barack was weaker in and thus she got last time.
Nevada and South Carolina are the real ones that'll tell us how things will go there.