Originally posted by Star428
You were the one who started bashing republicans first in the other thread.
Remember the LIBERAL mottos Star.
Its ok for US to do it, but not for YOU to do it.
And I will no longer call them Libbos.
Calling them LIBERALS is more accurate any way.
Which is a name they stole from the Libertarian's.
😱
Originally posted by Star428
Yep, but only [b]after they were all disarmed, of course. And that's just one of many examples of bad things happening to citizens of countries who've had their guns (self-defense) taken away. [/B]
https://twitter.com/Westxgal/status/651432284516577281
Obama already has two out of three. God help us if the American people lets him get the last one. Never give up your right to bear arms. 👆
http://www.dennisprager.com/the-right-does-have-answers-on-guns-mr-president/
Interesting read from Prager.
Originally posted by Digi
I just read a Forbes article - can't link it currently bc I'm on my phone - that went into detail about how Congress has banned the CDC from studying gun violence. I'm not talking about laws, restrictions, freedoms, etc. They can't STUDY it.Most of its supporters are apparently Republican. The article quoted Boehner for a representative opinion, iirc. The argument was that guns aren't a disease. I agree, but that argument is shredded when compared to many of the other things the CDC is allowed to study.
I talked earlier about wanting more data. Regardless of which side of the issue we're all on, I hope we can agree that more information on this would be a good thing. Even if you object to the CDC doing it, find someone else to accomplish the same thing.
If you want Washington to do something, start there.
I believe this. But if the study went forward I dont think it would benefit more democrats mindset. I can be wrong but it seems to me if they really examined gun violence it wouldn't be good for alot cities that are demo bastions.
We do need our gun law enforced or fine tuned I have no problem with that individually.
Originally posted by snowdragon
I believe this. But if the study went forward I dont think it would benefit more democrats mindset. I can be wrong but it seems to me if they really examined gun violence it wouldn't be good for alot cities that are demo bastions.
Indeed, it wouldn't. Here's an example of the "utopia" of a city that's in a "gun free" zone:
https://twitter.com/jstines3/status/651449154636513281
It hardly helps the gun control argument. Does it?
Trump to the rescue:
http://conservativetribune.com/trump-assault-weapons-ban/
I'm glad someone has a voice of reason in all of this gun control talk.
Well said, Trump. 👆
Why was the CNN reports shooter as white thread closed.
It's actually true, though the photoshop wasn't.
They showed his father (who is white) and kept using stock footage of a white woman when talking about his mother (who is black). They also ran a story about how this shooter hated black people, as a possible motive.
Originally posted by Henry_Pym
Why was the CNN reports shooter as white thread closed.It's actually true, though the photoshop wasn't.
They showed his father (who is white) and kept using stock footage of a white woman when talking about his mother (who is black). They also ran a story about how this shooter hated black people, as a possible motive.
Because the alleged photoshop in the premise of the thread was a complete fabrication.
But you can use this thread to post your false conspiracy theories, really.
Do you guys like me making you look dumb?