Oregon Campus Shooting

the best way to humiliate these clowns is to quote their own sources to prove they never even read it.

The website Conservative Treehouse posted two photos of the shooter, one with his skin appearing more white and his features altered. They said CNN broadcasted the altered version, but CNN's Brian Stelter denied that in a tweet.

The website has since noted that CNN denies it aired the photo and admitted it got the side-by-side from a tweet.

Info Wars also posted the side-by-side and wrote that "the race of Mercer does not fit the narrative that only white males — and thus white supremacist — can be mass shooters."

Originally posted by Henry_Pym
Why was the CNN reports shooter as white thread closed.

It's actually true, though the photoshop wasn't.

So, all we know for sure, as is stated in your article, is that this website "Conservative Treehouse" lied to suit their agenda, and CNN did no such thing. Okay, thanks for sharing.

Originally posted by Henry_Pym
You're incapable of self realization?

Wow, explains a lot

Seriously? You are misusing the word again? After I pointed it out? Couldn't you have edited your quote to make yourself seem less ignorant?

LOL. So because people like u and Ush believe CNN (an obvious left wing source) over a right wing source that justifies him shutting down thread. I mean, gee, ¡f CNN says they never did it then it must be true! LOL. Whether or not they actually posted that picture of him looking white it doesn't matter because it's undeniable that CNN tried their darndest to make people believe he was white in other ways.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Seriously? You are misusing the word again? After I pointed it out? Couldn't you have edited your quote to make yourself seem less ignorant?

You're stagnating yourself, because you can't accept reality.

Will people read my post, damnit.

I said that CNN did alter the context of the story by giving the illusion his parents are both white.

I never said the photoshop was CNN's doing or not.

Like your link said, the photoshop was a complete lie by the biased right wing media, I'm not sure what else there is to discuss.

Originally posted by Henry_Pym
again, you assume my my intent.

You're stagnating yourself, because you can't accept reality.

Did I assume your your intent? Or are you just misinformed and use words you don't understand? I'll help you, it's the latter.

it's entire argument has been blown to pieces, by it's own source, and yet the barking continues.

Originally posted by Star428
LOL. So because people like u and Ush believe CNN (an obvious left wing source) over a right wing source that justifies him shutting down thread. I mean, gee, ¡f CNN says they never did it then it must be true! LOL. Whether or not they actually posted that picture of him looking white it doesn't matter because it's undeniable that CNN tried their darndest to make people believe he was white in other ways.

Nah, the right wing source admitted they lied, Henry Pym showed as much with his sources.

It's obvious you two are too bigoted to read anything that you don't agree with.

Originally posted by Henry_Pym
It's obvious you two are too bigoted to read anything that you don't agree with.

We read it. The right wing media admitted it lied to make CNN look bad, what else is there to say.

dont act like you spotted it, you lazy credit-stealer. i took the time to read it. not you.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
dont act like you spotted it, you lazy credit-stealer. i took the time to read it. not you.

I did read it as well, I chose to go a different route at the time. Admittedly, yours was better.

Originally posted by Bardock42
I did read it as well, I chose to go a different route at the time. Admittedly, yours was better.

@slay

Yet,

Neither of you can post me arguing about the photoshop.

For the third time, I brought up how CNN used stock footage of a white woman as a stand in for the mother

Edit double

no argument left....yet the barking persists. fascinating.