Oregon Campus Shooting

Started by BackFire29 pages

Most likely some kind of untreated mental illness.

He also posted to 4chan yesterday talking about doing this.

http://i.imgur.com/oUzhCuJ.png

But atm, wouldn't it make MORE sense to have guns tracked so as to lower risks of them falling into the wrong hands?

No. You can have tighter gun control without having a registry.

There are also reports that the gunman asked everyone in the class to identify their religion before shooting them. So this may have also had some kind of religious motive.

Problem is that school in Roseburg, OR didn't have enough additional security or no security at all to begin with due to a no gun policy state's got going so what's clearly needed is security. Armed security. I say security a lot in case it keeps getting overlooked.

It is really Liberal/Progressive Thinking that a "No Gun Policy" somehow means that it also effects Security as well.

Gun control is pointless if someone wants to commit an act of terror and kill people. It's rather easy to make homemade bombs. Many other ways exist to kill people if someone really wants to.

I don't know the statistics on stabbing deaths, but I know it is high. Do we ban knives? Drunk drivers kill people every day. Do we ban cars? Guns are the only issue where people blame the weapon more than the person. I wouldn't be surprised if these are false flag attacks to gather support to ban firearms in this country.

Apologies if this has already been posted:

http://www.theonion.com/article/no-way-prevent-says-only-nation-where-regularly-ha-51444

Originally posted by BackFire
Most likely some kind of untreated mental illness.

He also posted to 4chan yesterday talking about doing this.

http://i.imgur.com/oUzhCuJ.png

I browsed that thread yesterday lol.

Spooky.

Originally posted by BackFire
Most likely some kind of untreated mental illness.

He also posted to 4chan yesterday talking about doing this.

http://i.imgur.com/oUzhCuJ.png

Of course it would be some shit head from /r9k/

Truly the most deplorable of boards on the 'chan. Not even /pol/ is such a treacherous hive of scum and villainy.

4chan never went there. I bet the place is a bust.

To the contrary, you'd fit in right in I think.

Nah, they're too hardcore even for Quan.

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
Nah, they're too hardcore even for Quan.
Absurd.

Originally posted by Tzeentch
To the contrary, you'd fit in right in I think.
Do they argue fictional matchups ?

Originally posted by FinalAnswer
Of course it would be some shit head from /r9k/

Who the hell are those people anyway? Are they like btards?

Originally posted by Omega Vision
Apologies if this has already been posted:

http://www.theonion.com/article/no-way-prevent-says-only-nation-where-regularly-ha-51444

Yes, it has been posted already and I've expressed my thoughts on it on page 2.

Originally posted by quanchi112
4chan never went there. I bet the place is a bust.

Used to be better 8-10 years ago.

R9K is a board explicitly for people who are depressed/suicidal/socially awkward etc.

Originally posted by ArtificialGlory
Used to be better 8-10 years ago.
Can't that be said of all message boards ?

Originally posted by Tzeentch
R9K is a board explicitly for people who are depressed/suicidal/socially awkward etc.

Oh dear, I think I'm beginning to understand. Does the place have a lot of irrationally angry permavirgins?

Originally posted by quanchi112
Can't that be said of all message boards ?

Ehh, I suppose.