Appears he was targeting Christians.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/02/us/oregon-umpqua-community-college-shooting/index.html
Appears he was targeting Christians.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/02/us/oregon-umpqua-community-college-shooting/index.html
here's my theory on these mass killers
usually they are no-pussy getting losers, who write some manifesto before they go on their spree
and then we all spend the next month or so combing through their manifesto and turning them into virtual celebrities, which is exactly what they want
so in order to deal with this phenomenon.... when someone does this sort of thing we should all just ignore it. since we lack the willpower to do that... the state should just make it illegal to report on this sort of thing. and as retribution, destroy any trace of the identity of the killer such as their facebook account, youtube account, any family pictures including them should be photo-shopped to remove them, etc.
then and only then can we help to curb this sort of behavior, my friends.
Originally posted by red g jacks:/ lol
here's my theory on these mass killersusually they are no-pussy getting losers, who write some manifesto before they go on their spree
and then we all spend the next month or so combing through their manifesto and turning them into virtual celebrities, which is exactly what they want
so in order to deal with this phenomenon.... when someone does this sort of thing we should all just ignore it. since we lack the willpower to do that... the state should just make it illegal to report on this sort of thing. and as retribution, destroy any trace of the identity of the killer such as their facebook account, youtube account, any family pictures including them should be photo-shopped to remove them, etc.
then and only then can we help to curb this sort of behavior, my friends.
That would also stagnate research into why people commit mass murder, fascist
😂
Originally posted by Tattoos N Scars
Gun control is pointless if someone wants to commit an act of terror and kill people. It's rather easy to make homemade bombs. Many other ways exist to kill people if someone really wants to.I don't know the statistics on stabbing deaths, but I know it is high. Do we ban knives? Drunk drivers kill people every day. Do we ban cars? Guns are the only issue where people blame the weapon more than the person. I wouldn't be surprised if these are false flag attacks to gather support to ban firearms in this country.
Indeed they are much higher than gun deaths:
...and yet, no one is calling for more restrictive sales of knives. I wonder why? 😕
Could it be that it's because knives won't help us when the government oversteps its boundaries?
In Obama's latest gun control rant after the shooting he referred to himself 28 times:
http://www.redflagnews.com/headlines-2015/4nzgcxzmshpdma88iaeufjuil40q1e
What does that tell you?
Edit: Obviously, my question is intended for people who don't think Obama is some kind of Saint who can do no wrong and aren't blind and have an IQ at least in the double digits. Which means it excludes liberals, of course.
Originally posted by Star428
Indeed they are much higher than gun deaths:...and yet, no one is calling for more restrictive sales of knives. I wonder why? 😕
Could it be that it's because knives won't help us when the government oversteps its boundaries?
Neither will guns. Do you genuinely think an assault rifle would cause any problems for a B2 bomber or a tank?
Originally posted by jaden101
Neither will guns. Do you genuinely think an assault rifle would cause any problems for a B2 bomber or a tank?
Do you genuinely think that our entire military will obey unlawful orders to wage all-out war against and slaughter American citizens? If you do, you don't understand American loyalty at all.
The logic of "if the argument wants to start a war, they'll come with tanks and your guns are useless" is facetious. It ignores strategy and rules of combat to just use tanks and air raids. This isn't a land war in asia, it's a continent where a land war is probably going to account for the majority of the battles.
Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]It is really Liberal/Progressive Thinking that a "No Gun Policy" somehow means that it also effects Security as well. [/B]
Perhaps not nothing but the ease of accessibility when it comes to firearms in the states is something that only worsens the issue, I think.
The more challenging it is, the less likely someone would be able to commit these atrocities. People immediately cry, "It's mental illness! Throw tax dollars to improve education, therapy, medicine, etc!"
I don't think it is that straightforward. It's only a portion of what needs to be done to curb these shooting sprees.
Originally posted by Star428
Do you genuinely think that our entire military will obey unlawful orders to wage all-out war against and slaughter American citizens? If you do, you don't understand American loyalty at all.
I don't think even a tiny proportion of the US military would follow orders to kill US citizens. But then that only makes the argument that the citizens should be armed in case of government tyranny even more redundant.