BLM mob disrupts students in Dartmouth library

A BLM group disrupted students at Darthmouth college in the library with racist chants. Apparently including calling the students "filthy white f*cks".

One Dartmouth administrator..sides WITH the people disrupting her students and doing racist chants at them.

http://www.mediaite.com/uncategorized/dartmouth-administrator-sides-with-blacklivesmatter-protesters-who-disrupted-library/

What the f*ck has the world come to? The "vice provost" for student affairs even apologized to the protesters for the negative responses they got.

Group sounds like any other hate group now, and these pieces of crap were calling these students RACIST while at the same time calling them "filthy white f*cks" which is racist.

Isn't it strange that the thing that has taken all credibility away from this movement has not been racist white people, but the blacks involved in it?

Now are they going to call for this admin to be fired? After all she isn't doing enough to make the students feel safe, where is their safe space?

Well, reading the article, it sounds like the professor apparently says these reports of racist chants and physical confrontations weren't true and that it was a peaceful protest.

There's video of some of the protests which shows the protest, the protesters only chant "Black Lives Matter" in it, not the "racist" epithets that the media claims.

YouTube video

Perhaps there were some of those, but the video evidence at least seems to side with the professors view, that the spin put on it by right wing media is wrong.

Oh please, the damn school newspaper even called out these protesters for their language and tactics. Your video isn't even 2 minutes long.

Also in the article all the woman does is note there were no complaints about violence.

Also in the very article you are talking about you see a picture of one of the protesters flipping the damn bird. That is behavior done at peaceful protests? Or by "peaceful" do you just mean there was no physical violence?

Originally posted by Surtur
Oh please, the damn school newspaper even called out these protesters for their language and tactics. Your video isn't even 2 minutes long.

Also in the article all the woman does is note there were no complaints about violence.

The opinion piece by the school newspaper is the only source that the other media cites. So if they got their facts wrong so would every other outlet.

I don't understand what you want, should the administrator not say that she thinks the media has misreported the protest if she feels that way?

So this is..what?

http://thetab.com/us/dartmouth/2015/11/14/i-was-proud-to-be-part-of-last-nights-protest-until-it-turned-ugly-978

This is the school newspaper piece:

http://www.dartreview.com/eyes-wide-open-at-the-protest/

The other piece was from a dude that was there. Actually there. The woman spouting off about there being nothing bad that happened was not there, but merely said they received no complaints of violence. He saw and heard this stuff and hell he didn't even stay until the end.

It should be pointed out not EVERY member of the group there was shouting these racist things, so it's not like they all walked in screaming kill Whitey.

Originally posted by Surtur
So this is..what?

http://thetab.com/us/dartmouth/2015/11/14/i-was-proud-to-be-part-of-last-nights-protest-until-it-turned-ugly-978

This is the school newspaper piece:

http://www.dartreview.com/eyes-wide-open-at-the-protest/

The other piece was from a dude that was there. Actually there. The woman spouting off about there being nothing bad that happened was not there, but merely said they received no complaints of violence. He saw and heard this stuff and hell he didn't even stay until the end.

From the article:

"It is important to note that a large majority of the protestors did not engage in harassment of other students, but they are now being labelled as aggressive because of the small minority."

That seems to be the crux really, the media response solely focussed on a couple instances, whether true or not, and blamed the whole movement, and so did you. The professor on the other hand says this is an inappropriate response.

Yes nobody said it was every member of this mob. But if people come in as part of a group and a small amount of the group are saying "**** you filthy whites" you don't apologize to them. The BLM's movement should be the ones saying sorry.

I also have not heard any reports of people from the movement trying to stop those people who were being racist.

Of course the overall behavior of coming into a library where students are paying a tuition to be at this school to get an education and disrupting them over some stupid bullshit. Is this supposed to make people supportive to the cause?

The article states that the woman apologised to the protesters for the reaction they got, which she views as unjust. So you are again equating the protesters as a whole to the alleged actions of a handful at most.

So she views it an unjust reaction to react badly to a group of people who come in with even a SMALL amount of people in tow saying racist shit, and it is unjust for people to react to that loud obnoxious as all hell minority they were seeing?

So now it's bad to negatively react to a bunch of racist pieces of shit because they were surrounded by other obnoxious, but apparently not racist people?

That sounds ridiculous. Of course if people part of a mob come in acting that way the entire mob will get a negative reaction. That's not racist or wrong.

Originally posted by Surtur
So she views it an unjust reaction to react badly to a group of people who come in with even a SMALL amount of people in tow saying racist shit, and it is unjust for people to react to that loud obnoxious as all hell minority they were seeing?

So now it's bad to negatively react to a bunch of racist pieces of shit because they were surrounded by other obnoxious, but apparently not racist people?

That sounds ridiculous. Of course if people part of a mob come in acting that way the entire mob will get a negative reaction. That's not racist or wrong.

It's bad to color your reporting based on a small minority and paint the larger protest movement with the same brush, yes. That lacks journalistic integrity.

But this wasn't about the entire movement. She was apologizing to the protesters specifically. So again I ask why it is wrong to have a negative reaction? I'd expect one, wouldn't you? A reaction to a group of people which consists of people being racist..the EXACT SAME THING they are fighting against. When I say group I of course mean that literal group of people that gathered. You might say "but you called BLM a hate group" but that isn't due to this one incident.

Then let me ask you this: take out all the racist bullshit some people in this mob spouted. This protest, this manner of protest..of coming into a library of students who did nothing to them and are just trying to study..and chanting and all that shit.

Is this right? Is this not obnoxious as all hell?

Originally posted by Surtur
But this wasn't about the entire movement. She was apologizing to the protesters specifically. So again I ask why it is wrong to have a negative reaction? I'd expect one, wouldn't you? A reaction to a group of people which consists of people being racist..the EXACT SAME THING they are fighting against. When I say group I of course mean that literal group of people that gathered. You might say "but you called BLM a hate group" but that isn't due to this one incident.

Then let me ask you this: take out all the racist bullshit some people in this mob spouted. This protest, this manner of protest..of coming into a library of students who did nothing to them and are just trying to study..and chanting and all that shit.

Is this right? Is this not obnoxious as all hell?

It's wrong to have a negative reaction if it is aimed at the wrong target. I.e. if you blame 150 people for one alleged incident.

The protest itself. Going into a library for a while and chanting your tagline, seems very benign in the grand scheme of protests. Of course it is obnoxious to the people disagreeing, it always is.

Bardock's got this one covered I'll see what else is going on

Had to be a very small group if they were students at Dartmouth.

Yeah I saw this, there is absolutely no reason for them to be marching around and screaming in a library when students are trying to study for midterms.

Originally posted by Bardock42
It's wrong to have a negative reaction if it is aimed at the wrong target. I.e. if you blame 150 people for one alleged incident.

The protest itself. Going into a library for a while and chanting your tagline, seems very benign in the grand scheme of protests. Of course it is obnoxious to the people disagreeing, it always is.

Those other protesters stood back and watched it happen. Even when a girl was supposedly being made to cry. A group of people come in, some verbally abusing the students in the library and the students have a negative reaction and the students are in the wrong.

Then if you find this type of behavior in general obnoxious it is obviously because you disagree and not just because it is plain obnoxious. Because nobody could agree with the movement and find this type of protest obnoxious? It's like when people protest by blocking traffic, all people come away with is "f*cker blocked traffic" not "oh damn I am sympathetic to that cause".

BLM is nothing more than a terrorist group; black on black crime is the real demographic, would love them to take on those types of people of gangs and stupid high school students.

The people in the video were being douches, but hopefully their actions won't taint any of the good work others in the "movement" might be doing.

Originally posted by SayWhat
BLM is nothing more than a terrorist group

hmmm...i suppose you're starving for attention?

Well if he is starved for attention he is in good company, the people in the article were starved for it as well. So we have a whole lot of starving folk.