shocking but true hitler himself was extremley anti-gun like obama same with stalin, mao and pol pot. very disgusting obama should be thrown out of office total basket case he is insane. also its a well known fact that the first gun control laws in the US were meant against black people and supported by the KKK so i guess its librals supporting the racist position hahaha.
Originally posted by Agusto Pinochet
shocking but true hitler himself was extremley anti-gun like obama same with stalin, mao and pol pot. very disgusting obama should be thrown out of office total basket case he is insane. also its a well known fact that the first gun control laws in the US were meant against black people and supported by the KKK so i guess its librals supporting the racist position hahaha.
The liberal left and most in the dark conservatives will never face up, or accept the fact that Obama is Muslim, not Christian, that he is a fanatical far left wing zealot, and his purpose is to destroy the American way of life.
Even his own admission of his agenda as "In 5 days I will fundamentally transform America." Is still not enough proof of this and his subsequent actions. People run from the 800lb gorilla every time.
Obama is anti-american and anti-christian.
Originally posted by Robtard
Context: That was in regards to WW1 and Indians not being armed to join in the war/form a military 👆
ghandi was a pacifist but he was very pro-gun and pro-self defense. ghandi was not the peace loving ultra-pacifist that liberals make him out to be he believed in self-defense and was traditionalist.
true here to
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
👆Well Surtur, what you think?
theirs no way for them to spin this ether
“I do believe that where there is only a choice between cowardice and violence I would advise violence,” Gandhi wrote in his famous work, Doctrine of the Sword.
He continues:
…When my eldest son asked me what he should have done, had he been present when I was almost fatally assaulted in 1908, whether he should have run away and seen me killed or whether he should have used his physical force which he could and wanted to use, and defended me, I told him that it was his duty to defend me even by using violence.
Gandhi advocated “training in arms” to defend liberty
Gandhi also advocated justified violence over the “cowardice” of submission. Again, this is in his own words:
…Hence also do I advocate training in arms for those who believe in the method of violence. I would rather have India resort to arms in order to defend her honor than that she should in a cowardly manner become or remain a helpless witness to her own dishonor. – M.K. Gandhi, The Doctrine of the Sword.
Gandhi also explains that someone who cannot use violence to defend themselves or their family is a helpless coward and a “worm.”
In his own words from the text Between Cowardice And Violence
…He who cannot protect himself or his nearest and dearest or their honour by non-violently facing death may and ought to do so by violently dealing with the oppressor. He who can do neither of the two is a burden. He has no business to be the head of a family. He must either hide himself, or must rest content to live for ever in helplessness and be prepared to crawl like a worm at the bidding of a bully …
[When violence] is offered in self-defence or for the defence of the defenceless, it is an act of bravery far better than cowardly submission.
In his own words, Gandhi advocated facing danger with measured violence (i.e. shooting back)
Also from Gandhi’s text Between Cowardice And Violence
…A man who, when faced by danger, behaves like a mouse, is rightly called a coward.
Not knowing the stuff of which nonviolence is made, many have honestly believed that running away from danger every time was a virtue compared to offering resistance, especially when it was fraught with danger to one’s life. As a teacher of nonviolence I must, so far as it is possible for me, guard against such an unmanly belief.
Self-defence … is the only honourable course where there is unreadiness for self-immolation.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Actually that does not disprove what Ghandi said, good effort though with the context argument though.
I wasn't disproving what Gandhi said. I was explaining the context of the quote and it was in regards to India having a military and being able to defend itself, instead of relying on the British and being under their rule. It was a quote in regards to Indian sovereignty.
Originally posted by Robtard
The way it seems, I suppose. I wouldn't think Gandhi would be for abortion, probably not on any grounds.Since we're quoting Gandhi for some reason, here's a good one:
"Poverty is the worst form of violence." -Gandhi.
How does that go against anything me, TI, or star have said?
Obama in essence is doing this to distract us from SB and his failed foreign policy.
It will only work against him now because now this election will be determined a lot on this issue.
Whether to elect a liberal who won't revoke his executive orders, or Trump who will remove them. This will now be up to the people this November.
I suspect that with the hard numbers like in Chicago that proves laws against guns does not work.
Chicago proves gun laws don't work.
This will only weaken the liberal party and Hilary Clinton.
Regarding gun control, Trump destroys Clinton with one tweet:
http://americanactionnews.com/articles/trump-destroys-hillary-clinton-with-one-tweet
Someone needs to slap that b**** upside the ****ing head when she makes idiotic statements like this: "Guns don't keep people safe".
What a stupid ****ing b****.