Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Yet you have no answer on why the strictest gun laws in the nation: Chicago, produce zero results.
It's actually not difficult to get guns illegally in Chicago. I can almost guarantee you not all of these people are driving to another city to get their weapons. Gang bangers don't just sell drugs and shoot innocent children in the face...they will sell guns to people as well. Usually to other gangs they are "allies" with.
Originally posted by Bardock42
You are taking that out of context though. What she means is that guns in the hands of private citizens do not keep people safe. You can argue with that of course, but pretending she meant security professionals misrepresents her stance.
LOL. THat's not what she said though. I don't care what her "intent" was and it's not "taking it out of context". She said "guns don't make people safe". PERIOD. It was just yet another one of her stupid ass inflammatory statements. Sorry but politicians shouldn't get extra rights that the rest of us don't have. The BIll of Rights applies to EVERY AMERICAN. Not just Presidential candidates or their security detail. 👆
Originally posted by Star428
LOL. THat's not what she said though. I don't care what her "intent" was and it's not "taking it out of context". She said "guns don't make people safe". PERIOD. It was just yet another one of her stupid ass inflammatory statements. Sorry but politicians shouldn't get extra rights that the rest of us don't have. The BIll of Rights applies to EVERY AMERICAN. Not just Presidential candidates or their security detail. 👆
So context isn't important in what politicians say?
I mean it's pretty clear she meant in regards to the gun control debate, which isn't a debate about the use of firearms by trained professionals like the secret service or the military.
Again, I don't really care "what she actually meant". It's hypocritical to claim "guns don't keep people safe" while at the same time you have a huge security detail protecting you with guns. Obviously, those guns do keep her safe or else they wouldn't have them. Same thing applies to private citizens. We have just as much right to protect ourselves as that b**** does. PERIOD. Trump put her in her place with that tweet. 👆
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
According to you the bill of rights would apply to aliens as well, shellhead.
The Bill of Rights does apply to aliens, that's why foreigners have rights and you can't just beat and rape "illegals" for fun.
Unless you meant extraterrestrials, but that's an entirely different subject since they wouldn't be human and it's open to debate.
Originally posted by Robtard
The Bill of Rights does apply to aliens, that's why foreigners have rights and you can't just beat and rape "illegals" for fun.Unless you meant extraterrestrials, but that's an entirely different subject since they wouldn't be human and it's open to debate.
How do you know they sent humans Rob?
Haven't you ever watched Ancient Aliens?
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/obama-we-are-here-prevent-next-mass-shooting-n490566
"Weeping at the memory of the children murdered during a shooting spree at Sandy Hook Elementary School, President Obama unveiled a series of executive actions Tuesday aimed at preventing more mass killings. "
I wonder..does he weep about all the people ISIS have killed with the guns he gave them?
Originally posted by Robtard
Why would you risk that when you could take a short drive and do it both legally and in a safe environment though?
I do love how you use logic here. I would ask..why take risks by pulling drive bys and shooting people up? Answer: these people don't take logic into account. They have no problem committing a variety of other crimes here, why would guns be any different then shooting innocent kids in the face?
You see if they were using their brains in the first place they'd have no reason to go get a gun because they wouldn't be dumb enough to join one of these shitty gangs. They'd realize "wow these gangs are a huge huge part of the problems we face" and not take any part in it. Instead you have low life's that will kill people *just* to gain entry into these gangs.
But if they get killed by someone you can be guaranteed a family member(usually not the father) will be on tv saying they were a good boy. Most people if they have a family member who is a dangerous criminal and gets killed? They don't suddenly hate their kids, but they also don't usually go on live tv and utterly embarrass themselves.