FBI Director wants to Indict Hilary Clinton

Started by BackFire29 pages
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
"Saying" though.

Sure. But words can be pretty damaging, as we've already seen.

Not saying words are worse, just that if Clinton has some bombshell about Trump in storage, she'll be releasing it soon to distract.

I have to admit..my delight has abated a bit. Now that this is all sinking in..she got away with this shit before and just reading some of the comments sections in these articles..even the Hilary supporters who find this all disturbing don't think she'll suffer true consequences.

Why are words more damaging then action iyo?

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Why are words more damaging then action iyo?

Well I'm not really saying they necessarily are. It depends what the FBI finds in this new investigation, and it depends what theoretical words would be coming out of Trump's mouth.

I mean just this election over all as we have seen that they are. Like isn't a person claiming he was called a ******* just as worthy as a person claiming she was touched?

We also know everything Bill and Hilllary said about Obama in 2008, it's far worse then anything trump has said.

And that does not even include what was in the podesta emails

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Why are words more damaging then action iyo?

It's not even just his words normally, he has said stuff before that people called racist and misogynist. However, in the past he insulted specific people. Calling Rosie O'Donnell a fat slob doesn't mean you hate all women, and well..she is a fat slob too. But now he was vulgar to just women specifically.

He can be crude and vulgar, but we're electing a president of the country not the president of good manners.

Obviously it would be ideal to have a less vulgar person, but likewise it would be super cool to have a less corrupt person as well.

I feel like if we elect her we're more or less saying "as long as you are polite do whatever the f*ck you want" and hell she isn't even polite lol. She calls blacks super predators, people in her campaign are quite casually racist and nobody bats an eye. They laugh about how they can manipulate us, and people are ready to just line up and ask for seconds. Which if so then we just deserve whatever happens to us, we created this evil and we gave it our stamp of approval.

Also people tend to be stupid and it's easier to wrap their heads around "der he said bad things" than all this political corruption that we have come to expect from politicians. If we elect Hilary then the politicians are right to laugh at us.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
I mean just this election over all as we have seen that they are. Like isn't a person claiming he was called a ******* just as worthy as a person claiming she was touched?

We also know everything Bill and Hilllary said about Obama in 2008, it's far worse then anything trump has said.

And that does not even include what was in the podesta emails

I think you are minimizing the Trump scandal here. The Trump scandal isn't bad because it's just words, but because it implies actions that are sexual assault, and the accusations against Trump that you are implying are "just words" are alleging sexual assault. And sexually assaulting someone, or potentially sexually assaulting someone is worse than calling someone a name.

But I don't want to get too far off topic here, this thread is about the FBI investigation.

What kind of impact do you think this new investigation will have? Do you think this hands Trump the presidency?

No this isn't handing him anything, It might even it out.

We still have massive scale planned voter fraud on tape, which is undeniable proof. Even the talk of it is a felony.

The machines in Texas are flipping votes which they are neck and neck in.

And then he has to win the electoral collage.

Originally posted by BackFire
I think you are minimizing the Trump scandal here. The Trump scandal isn't bad because it's just words, but because it implies actions that are sexual assault, and the accusations against Trump that you are implying are "just words" are alleging sexual assault. And sexually assaulting someone, or potentially sexually assaulting someone is worse than calling someone a name.

But I don't want to get too far off topic here, this thread is about the FBI investigation.

What kind of impact do you think this new investigation will have? Do you think this hands Trump the presidency?

Here is my thing though, when he was talking about this wasn't he saying "they let you" before he said it? It seemed he was talking about women letting him get away with shit he normally couldn't because he's Trump.

Plus he was out with his friends and shit right? I'm not using the "locker talk" excuse, but rather..were any rapes reported that day? Why didn't he just maul the first female he saw?

Yup he said "they let you." Not "I force myself on them."

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial

The machines in Texas are flipping votes which they are neck and neck in.

I saw O'Reilly question Trump about this and O'Reilly asked what proof there was and Trump skated the question with something like 'people told me'.

Do we actually have concert proof of this besides assertions?

I actually live in Texas rob. I know people who vote who it's happened to. If you vote straight ticket republican, it flips your vote👆

Originally posted by Surtur
Here is my thing though, when he was talking about this wasn't he saying "they let you" before he said it? It seemed he was talking about women letting him get away with shit he normally couldn't because he's Trump.

Plus he was out with his friends and shit right? I'm not using the "locker talk" excuse, but rather..were any rapes reported that day? Why didn't he just maul the first female he saw?

If you're going to believe the women that accused Bill of sexual misconduct then you have to believe the women that accused Trump, they're similar instances with the added benefit of having Trump on tape bragging about: "I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait."

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
I actually live in Texas rob.

Yes, I know. Why I specifically asked you. Is there actual proof of machines flipping votes besides assertions?

edit: To your edit as you added. How many people do you know?

Originally posted by Robtard
I saw O'Reilly question Trump about this and O'Reilly asked what proof there was and Trump skated the question with something like 'people told me'.

Do we actually have concert proof of this besides assertions?

Well did you see the one article? The woman says no these machines didn't do it, she says it was human error, but then she also mentions a case where the machines legitimately did do this(a single case, to be fair) and she then goes on to specify the machine was checked and wasn't malfunctioning.

Once again, this is the same person who was blaming every other instance of this on human error.

So if one instance wasn't human error and it wasn't a malfunction..I don't know what other conclusions we can draw?

I edited

Originally posted by Robtard
If you're going to believe the women that accused Bill of sexual misconduct then you have to believe the women that accused Trump, they're similar instances with the added benefit of having Trump on tape bragging about: "I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait."

I feel the same way though, if we're going to believe these accusations against Trump we need to believe we'll have a rapist sleeping in the White House no matter who wins.

Originally posted by Surtur
I feel the same way though, if we're going to believe these accusations against Trump we need to believe we'll have a rapist sleeping in the White House no matter who wins.

President Rapist has more ramifications than First Rapist.

Bill already was a rapist before he took office.

Can't build a time-machine and change history, so do we really want to repeat past mistakes?