Originally posted by Robtard
President Rapist has more ramifications than First Rapist.
It's saying rape is okay either way though. Wait, wouldn't a female president being okay with rape be worse than a male president who was a rapist? Cuz I mean..she kinda should be against rape.
I would think that more or less ENDORSING rape as being okay if you're rich and powerful..and her being the first female president and doing that..would have all kinds of ramifications.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
You really think Trump raped people? Believing that is pretty stupid tbh.
I'm just saying that if we believe he did we have to believe the same stuff about Bill Clinton.
So a president as a rapist is messed up, disturbing. A female president who is okay being married to a rapist, and who is the FIRST woman to hold the job..has all kinds of dark connotations. Oh and she helped defend rapists, and she would have also went after rape victims as well.
Originally posted by Surtur
It's saying rape is okay either way though. Wait, wouldn't a female president being okay with rape be worse than a male president who was a rapist? Cuz I mean..she kinda should be against rape.I would think that more or less ENDORSING rape as being okay if you're rich and powerful..and her being the first female president and doing that..would have all kinds of ramifications.
Disagreed, as we're not voting for Bill, Hillary is running. Would be like blaming Hillary if Chelsea were a serial killer.
Originally posted by Robtard
Disagreed, as we're not voting for Bill, Hillary is running. Would be like blaming Hillary if Chelsea were a serial killer.
Except Hilary isn't saying C-Dog will be helping her with the economy and shit. Let's not pretend the person married to the president wouldn't wield more influence and power than the child of a president. Especially when that person was ALSO president lol. It's not the same and you know it.
So that means: be a rapist, it's cool..as long as you're useful. That would be the lesson I'd take.
Originally posted by Surtur
Except Hilary isn't saying C-Dog will be helping her with the economy and shit.So that means: be a rapist, it's cool..as long as you're useful.
This assumes that Hillary believes her husband is a actually rapist. We don't know that.
So as a voter that's either voting for Trump or Clinton and you believe the accusations against both Bill and Donald are true, you're either voting a rapist as POTUS or a rapist's Wife as POTUS.
Originally posted by Robtard
I think believing every sexual story about Bill while dismissing all of Trump's is pretty dishonest.
Let me ask you another question though. Forget the rape stuff, would you agree that if all this corruption is indeed true..that Bill's hands are most likely just as bloody as hers? I would say the term "partner in crime" is apropos.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
You think she cares if he is a rapist? Nah, she defended rapists then laughed about it knowing they were guilty.
If he's a rapist I think she cares less about the fact he is a rapist and more about people finding out he is a rapist.
At this point if he is a rapist it would be hard to believe she legitimately had zero clue about it.
Originally posted by Surtur
Let me ask you another question though. Forget the rape stuff, would you agree that if all this corruption is indeed true..that Bill's hands are most likely just as bloody as hers? I would say the term "partner in crime" is apropos.
Don't know; I prefer not to jump to conclusions. Will wait to see how the story develops.
I already voted for Clinton. I seriously considered Stein but decided she was a loon with no real ideas about how things work. And Johnson is a dumb weirdo. Both the third party candidates are just as bad as the main candidates. I probably should have just left the presidential election choice blank since I dislike all of them, but I'm in California so it doesn't make a difference.