FBI Director wants to Indict Hilary Clinton

Started by Time-Immemorial29 pages

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Oh and here is the video of him saying it.

YouTube video

😂

Watch the video you putz.

"Mr President, when did you first learn that Hilary Clinton used an email system outside the US Government."

Obama: The same time as everyone else😂

Yet he emailed her 18 times on it😂

Hilary Clintons unsecured emails put spies lives at risk.

http://observer.com/2016/02/breaking-hillary-clinton-put-spies-lives-at-risk/

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/02/01/official-withheld-clinton-emails-contain-operational-intel-put-lives-at-risk.html

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
"Mr President, when did you first learn that Hilary Clinton used an email system outside the US Government."

Obama: The same time as everyone else😂

Yet he emailed her 18 times on it😂

You don't know how email works, do you?

Knowing that someone has email is not the same as knowing where their email server is located.

Oh so you are suggesting he is dumb and can't read the @state.gov? Just shut up already with you spinning the facts.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/02/01/18-emails-exchanged-between-obama-and-hillary-clinton-obama-claimed-he-learned-of-private-server-from-media/

However, that announcement seems to conflict with what the New York Daily News reported last March, when Obama said he discovered Clinton’s use of a personal email server through the media.

“The same time everybody else learned it through news reports,” he told CBS News.

“My emails, the BlackBerry I carry around, all those records are available and archived,” Obama said at the time, adding, “I’m glad that Hillary’s instructed that those emails about official business need to be disclosed.”

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Oh so you are suggesting he is dumb and can't read the @state.gov? Just shut up already with you spinning the facts.

The @ address isn't always indicative of where the email will be received. eg I can set up and receive my work emails on my home computer using MS Outlook, so even though my @*email-name* is my work's name, I can receive them while on my home computer, or in any random place using my laptop.

If you don't believe me, as DDM, he's some sort of email master or something now.

I'm starting to think Clinton has you two on her pay roll...you two will literally jump on any political bomb and try and make the best of it.

Whats worse is Q99 supports Clinton over Sanders, which off the top makes her full of shit.

Stating facts is just stating facts. As I said, if you think I'm lying about the email info above, ask DDM. I know you trust him and he's in internet security.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial

Watch the video you putz.

I did- it still doesn't say she sent classified-at-the-time stuff, and you posted an article saying specifically it was only classified later.

I like how you're trying to backpeddle and argue different, much more minor things ('Did Obama e-mail the account?'😉 after you posted an article essentially saying she's innocent. You've completely shifted goalposts.

And now everyone has seen you try and push on and say she's guilty in direct contradiction to what your own article saying....

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Hilary Clintons unsecured emails put spies lives at risk.

Ah yes, now we turn to opinion pieces.

Note how there was still no databreaches, i.e. absolutely no-one's lives were endangered, no data was leaked, and how the article covering the facts of the matter still says stuff was classified after.

The article you posted.

Once again, Time-Immemorial, you posted an article that says Hillary Clinton is innocent.

So, now that you're arguing against what you yourself posted, should we tell you to stop digging the hole you're making, or just let you keep going and see how far down you go?

There was a data breach, I already posted the source. Shut up already.

I don't know why you waste your time with this guy, Q. I really don't.

Cause she can't refute facts, only an idiot with no moral integrity would vote or stick up for this woman.

She destroyed 4 countries from her policies.

Oh and look the data breach.
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/10/hillary-clinton-email-server-hacked-china-south-korea-germany-214546

I would read that story and not just the headline.

😂

http://nypost.com/2016/01/31/this-was-all-planned-former-ig-says-hillary-state-dept-are-lying/

This isn't going away Rob.

Why would I want it to go away?

Confused though, previously above you made a post saying that Hillary had an '@state.gov' address, now his article says she didn't?

The 22 classified emails of which 18 was to the president were on her private server.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
The 22 classified emails of which 18 was to the president were on her private server.

Which, as your article noted earlier in the thread, were classified later, after the fact.

A fact you continue to buzz by and try to ignore, even though you're the one who posted it in the first place.

You're such a weasel, obviously lying about your own sources.

Things have moved from "Hillary sent around classified information!" to, "Hillary had e-mails from Obama, some of which were classifiedpleasedon'tnoticethatthatonlyhappenedwellafterthefact."

You and snow accuse me of defending Hillary, yet you show blatant, easily caught dishonesty in your attempts to present the situation. It's funny, if she's so guilty, why do you feel the need to lie every time?

I'm not special, anyone could've caught this, they only didn't because they didn't think that you'd actually lie about pages you posted.

You are a buffoon. There is no denying she has SAP on her server.

Originally posted by Q99

You and snow accuse me of defending Hillary, yet you show blatant, easily caught dishonesty in your attempts to present the situation. It's funny, if she's so guilty, why do you feel the need to lie every time?

You do defend her, Hillary has broken protocols and the state dept has been protecting her. Thats not a conspiracy or opinion, the state dept HAD to know about Hillary's email to even correspond via email, those are facts.

She is holding one of the highest positions in the US Govt. To believe that she never received classified emails in her time as SoS is naive.

It really doesn't matter though, really this just shows her character. The likelyhood of her being prosecuted is about ZERO with our current DoJ, regardless of what the FBI finds.