Here is a an article from reuters that would make things easier to digest in regards to information Hillary had:
With the last release and the top secret information realize this. That is the highest classification of information our govt uses. There is no way what so ever that said information was not sensitive prior to that label.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classified_information_in_the_United_States
Fully explains all the levels of classification and the type of information in each.
The only thing more hillarious about this particular incident is the support she still receives.
Originally posted by snowdragon
Here is a an article from reuters that would make things easier to digest in regards to information Hillary had:With the last release and the top secret information realize this. That is the highest classification of information our govt uses. There is no way what so ever that said information was not sensitive prior to that label.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classified_information_in_the_United_States
Fully explains all the levels of classification and the type of information in each.
The only thing more hillarious about this particular incident is the support she still receives.
The whole case shows that Hillary is dishonest or incompetent. Or both, actually.
Originally posted by snowdragon
Here is a an article from reuters that would make things easier to digest in regards to information Hillary had:With the last release and the top secret information realize this. That is the highest classification of information our govt uses. There is no way what so ever that said information was not sensitive prior to that label.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classified_information_in_the_United_States
Fully explains all the levels of classification and the type of information in each.
The only thing more hillarious about this particular incident is the support she still receives.
I wonder what people who say the whole thing was a smokescreen will think of this.
Official: Top Clinton aides also handled ‘top secret’ intel on her un secure server.
I agree
"The official said the accounts include not only Clinton’s but those of top aides – including Cheryl Mills, Huma Abedin, Jake Sullivan and Philippe Reines – as well as State Department Under Secretary for Management Patrick F. Kennedy and others. There is no public evidence they were authorized to receive the intelligence some of which was beyond Top Secret."
Once again this is labeled as vast right wing conspiracy, but why are only the Clintons targets of thus conspiracy? For decades it's mostly been the Clintons as the targets. Is it because their political power that threatening? If so, then how did a junior senator beat mrs. Clinton two elections ago.
In criminal investigations they say the most obvious answer is almost always the truth. So is a vast right wing conspiracy more obvious than the Clintons obviously being scum?
I don't think so. When you have to go through mental gymnastics to excuse a person over and over again....I think you need to start putting the blame where it belongs.
http://news.yahoo.com/judge-state-dept-finish-clinton-email-release-month-183121027.html
More dragging out this process......
Former obama white house official says Hilary should drop out
A federal Judge Emmet G. Sullivan, is now questioning Hilary Clintons motive for her private server.