Originally posted by Galan007
Deadpool Team-Up #883. Definitely non-canon, imo....Unless you think Galactus really posts ads in the newspaper to hire his heralds:
http://i.imgur.com/tRe1kTt.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/eq3E3yZ.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/pq9VRsh.jpg
To be fair, The Unbeatable Squirrel Girl is canon according to Ryan North (the writer), and in that series Galactus has a twitter account lol.
Originally posted by One-Punch
To be fair, The Unbeatable Squirrel Girl is canon according to Ryan North (the writer), and in that series Galactus has a twitter account lol.
Galactus replying to Squirrel Girl on twitter.
Then there's some 4th wall shenanigans where the above actually happened in real-life twitter 😂
Originally posted by One-Punch
You sure?I can lift and throw a 50lb boulder, but I sure as hell can't destroy it with my fists.
Yes. I am sure.
Google it.
Is easier to destroy a planet than to move it from it's orbital trench. SEE ASTEROID BELT
Put that 50lbs boulder on a gravitational orbital trench, hit it with enough force to destroy it and see if abandons it's orbital trench.
In order for it to escape it's orbital trench you will have to hit it with more force than the required to just destroy it.
Originally posted by Rao Kal El
Of course, see asteroid belt natures way to show a planet destroyed that didn't abandon an orbital trench.
Under Formation it says...
"In 1802, shortly after discovering Pallas, Olbers suggested to Herschel that Ceres and Pallas were fragments of a much larger planet that once occupied the Mars–Jupiter region, this planet having suffered an internal explosion or a cometary impact many million years before. Over time, however, this hypothesis has fallen from favor. The large amount of energy required to destroy a planet, combined with the belt's low combined mass, which is only about 4% of the mass of the Moon, do not support the hypothesis."
I reckon it takes way more energy to smash a planet than to move it.
Edit: the force of gravity is actually incredibly weak. Especially compared to the electromagnetic force, which if my memory serves is what holds things together (simplified, of course).
Imagine the force of gravity, from the entire Earth, pulling on an apple to fall down. Now imagine that thin tiny apply stalk, holding the apple to the tree.
"The asteroid belt formed from the primordial solar nebula as a group of planetesimals.[7] Planetesimals are the smaller precursors of the protoplanets. Between Mars and Jupiter, however, gravitational perturbations from Jupiter imbued the protoplanets with too much orbital energy for them to accrete into a planet.[7][8] Collisions became too violent, and instead of fusing together, the planetesimals and most of the protoplanets shattered. As a result, 99.9% of the asteroid belt's original mass was lost in the first 100 million years of the Solar System's history"
ORBITAL TRENCH
I know you really want to prove that destroying a planet is >>>>> than moving a planet out of it's orbital trench, because that way you can use your SS feats, but is not so
