Who can move Earth?

Started by ShadowFyre16 pages
Originally posted by krisblaze
I'm going to start a thread where the purpose is to name, and then prove with specific scans, that your character does not have donkeybrains.

I just made a who can rip a phonebook thread

Didn't surfer use his gravity powers to make 2 planets orbit around each other? And didn't he and 2 other annihilators fuse 2 suns and rearrange the planets of a solar system?

Hyperion obviously can,thor,hulk,blue marvel,sentry and kallark should be able to as well,as they r in hype's class,or at most 3 of them working together

Originally posted by Rao Kal El
"The asteroid belt formed from the primordial solar nebula as a group of planetesimals.[7] Planetesimals are the smaller precursors of the protoplanets. Between Mars and Jupiter, however, gravitational perturbations from Jupiter imbued the protoplanets with too much orbital energy for them to accrete into a planet.[7][8] Collisions became too violent, and instead of fusing together, the planetesimals and most of the protoplanets shattered. As a result, 99.9% of the asteroid belt's original mass was lost in the first 100 million years of the Solar System's history"

ORBITAL TRENCH


It's not very clear in what you quoted how destroying a planet takes less energy to pushing it. How about you just post the hard numbers on how much energy it takes to push a planet from a reputable source? Then we can compare.

Make sure to factor in distance (e.g., pushing a boulder 100 feet takes more energy than 10 feet) and speed (e.g., pushing a boulder 100 mph takes more energy than pushing it at 10mph).

I know you really want to prove that destroying a planet is >>>>> than moving a planet out of it's orbital trench, because that way you can use your SS feats, but is not so

Same could be said for you and Superman, who has more pushing feats than planet destroying feats. I didn't bring up Surfer at all in this thread, you did.

What I'm interested in is whether your claim that pushing a planet takes more energy than destroying a planet is true.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
I reckon it takes way more energy to smash a planet than to move it.

Edit: the force of gravity is actually incredibly weak. Especially compared to the electromagnetic force, which if my memory serves is what holds things together (simplified, of course).

Imagine the force of gravity, from the entire Earth, pulling on an apple to fall down. Now imagine that thin tiny apply stalk, holding the apple to the tree.


I reckon you might be right.

https://medium.com/starts-with-a-bang/the-physics-of-the-death-star-c21ccc58ade9#.sof2gfmfo

According to astrophysicist Ethan Siegel it would take 2.24 × 10^32 Joules, or 224,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 Joules of energy to destroy Earth.

To put that into perspective, the entire energy output of the Sun, a “mere” 3.8 × 10^26 Watts. It would take a full week’s worth of the Sun’s total energy output — delivered to an entire planet in the span of a few seconds — to cause that kind of reaction.

Now I wonder how much energy it takes to push earth x amount of distance?

Thor,Hulk,Hyperion,Gladiator.

To finish quoting your own post

You will need: 2,500,000,000,000 tons of antimatter Antimatter - the most explosive substance possible - can be manufactured in small quantities using any large particle accelerator, but this will take some considerable time to produce the required amounts. If you can create the appropriate machinery, it may be possible - and much easier - simply to "flip" 2.5 trillion tons of matter through a fourth dimension, turning it all to antimatter at once.
Method: This method involves detonating a bomb so big that it blasts the Earth to pieces.
How hard is that? The gravitational binding energy of a planet of mass M and radius R is - if you do the lengthy calculations — given by the formula E=(3/5)GM^2/R. For Earth, that works out to roughly 224,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 Joules. The Sun takes nearly a WEEK to output that much energy. Think about THAT.
To liberate that much energy requires the complete annihilation of around 2,500,000,000,000 tonnes of antimatter. That's assuming zero energy loss to heat and radiation, which is unlikely to be the case in reality: You'll probably need to up the dose by at least a factor of ten. Once you've generated your antimatter, probably in space, just launch it en masse towards Earth. The resulting release of energy (obeying Einstein's famous mass-energy equation, E=mc^2) should be sufficient to split the Earth into a thousand pieces.

READ CAREFULLY

Earth's final resting place: A second asteroid belt around the sun.

Meaning you couldn't escape the orbital trench.

Now for those who say is easier to move something out of an orbit.

Think a rocket. A rocket is easier to make it explode (destroy) than to make it escape earth's gravity

The force required to destroy it is less than the one required to move it and escape the gravitational pull.

In the case of earth. Earth is moving at incredible speeds on it's orbital trench and also spinning on it's axis is nothing like moving a stationary ball.

Imagine a bowling ball moving on an orbital trench at relative speed and also spinning. I will laugh at anyone trying to move it as easy as to moving a stationary ball

Is almost like saying that the force required to hit a non moving baseball is the same as the force required to hit a moving baseball at 80mph and that BOTh will have the same end result

If hyperion can move a planet,then no ANY reason said thor,hulk,sentry,etc cant do it
They are on the same level,even hickman agreed it

Hey. Im curious about that 4th dimension thing. Thats how they think to create anti-matter.

Originally posted by ShadowFyre
Hey. Im curious about that 4th dimension thing. Thats how they think to create anti-matter.

Not sure and this is in theory.

But here is the article. This particular one is #7

http://m.livescience.com/17875-destroy-earth-doomsday.html

Also I forgot to mention that in order to destroy earth with an antimatter detonation you don't need a lot of antimatter. With the antimatter mass of a 2 or 3 story house will be enough to destroy earth IIRC of course in theory

Originally posted by a88378438
If hyperion can move a planet,then no ANY reason said thor,hulk,sentry,etc cant do it
They are on the same level,even hickman agreed it

Deathsentry could, he has an equivalent feat I believe.

But where are the feats that suggest the other's could other than ABC logic?

Originally posted by carver9

Nice Bio Carver, is that your evidence?

Originally posted by Rao Kal El
Deathsentry could, he has an equivalent feat I believe.

But where are the feats that suggest the other's could other than ABC logic?


Did the Gladiator destroy a planet by his fist?
That is very impressive

Originally posted by One-Punch
To be fair, The Unbeatable Squirrel Girl is canon according to Ryan North (the writer), and in that series Galactus has a twitter account lol.

It's not just that. Unless you think this is canon as well where Wade enters a group therapy of former heralds.

Originally posted by One-Punch
Why don't you just explain it and provide a reference link.

Easy. Both Green Lanterns and Silver Surfer have destroyed planets casually. Heck, Binary, Drax and freaking Psimon have destroyed planets.

While Surfer has to use his whole power to move a moon, Lanterns have trouble moving planets and so on.

That doesn't make any sense nor did you prove it was related by any stretch of the imagination.

Surfer's own word.

He had to push harder than ever before to just move a moon.

So hyperbolic wording to sell the dramatic scene. 😂

But when Superman says someone is as powerful as he is you ignore his own words. This is why no one accepts this kind of double standard from you. Picking and choosing.

Originally posted by quanchi112
So hyperbolic wording to sell the dramatic scene. 😂

But when Superman says someone is as powerful as he is you ignore his own words. This is why no one accepts this kind of double standard from you. Picking and choosing.


Darkseid is one example,I dont remember he move planets on comic book
But people think Darkseid is more powerful than Superman..So..

Originally posted by a88378438
Did the Gladiator destroy a planet by his fist?
That is very impressive

Yes, but not planet moving force. Not enough to move the planet out of it's orbital trench

Originally posted by Blue Area Vet
LMAO!! Scans? Of what? You posed the question as a hypothetical, "Who CAN move earth" as opposed to "Who HAS moved earth." If not, then you are simply introducing another D.C./Marvel dick measuring contest.

Poor Abby, reacting poorly to how things aren't going over at Damn Clone Comics. I think you need a Rebirth. bye How about a new crossover to fix things: Deadpoole kills the D.C. Universe 😛

I have no idea why you're acting like you got your first period. It's easy to answer, the hyperion feat was one. Im sure the Hulk has a bunch. IF you have the scans or know about them, post them. Why cry like its the first time you've seen blood in your panties?