Darth Malgus vs. Savage Opress

The text doesn't really imply that at all.

So the Jedi just waved his lightsabers in a flourish and the building just so happened to rain down debris because.....why?...

Ok so then the Jedi didn't even cause the debris to fall, because there's no indication that the Jedi even did anything then. So no argument here.

Ever consider that Jedi don't always put down their lightsabers when they make gestures?

Ok so then the Jedi didn't cause the building to fall, it just fell then.

Originally posted by Nephthys

Well none of you have been making it really clear, as to what this argument is about. I've read through the text, it's either the Jedi used his lightsabers to cause the debris to fall....or the building just fell.

So what are you folks arguing about?

He used TK and the lightsabers were just used as a flourish like how people thrust out their hands when using force push.

The idea that he cut through supports causing two buildings to fall over, in the middle of the street, is absolutely ridiculous.

Edit: Wait...ok I got you, I must have misinterpreted.

Ok that said...WTF guys? Why is this such an argument??

Is there some reason that nameless guys can't have feats or something?

I mean this is considered ridiculous, yet far lesser Force Users are able to mind dominate entire tribes of people, beasts, hurling literal lighting from the skies, use Sith Sorcery to create abominations bred for battle and so on.

Yet a Jedi collapsing 2 unsound buildings, is ridiculous because.....??

Think about it this way. Are the buildings 3 meters away from each other? Because that's how close they'd have to be for the Zabrak to cut both of them with his blades.

I agree with Neph on the fact that he used TK and the lightsaber thing was just a flourish.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
Think about it this way. Are the buildings 3 meters away from each other? Because that's how close they'd have to be for the Zabrak to cut both of them with his blades.

I agree with Neph on the fact that he used TK and the lightsaber thing was just a flourish.

Yeah I read through the text again, misinterpreted it.

Originally posted by Zenwolf
Edit: Wait...ok I got you, I must have misinterpreted.

Ok that said...WTF guys? Why is this such an argument??

Is there some reason that nameless guys can't have feats or something?

I mean this is considered ridiculous, yet far lesser Force Users are able to mind dominate entire tribes of people, beasts, hurling literal lighting from the skies, use Sith Sorcery to create abominations bred for battle and so on.

Yet a Jedi collapsing 2 unsound buildings, is ridiculous because.....??

Thanks 4 the support. 👆

Originally posted by Nephthys
Thanks 4 the support. 👆

Welcome.

I'm just not seeing the logic here...so the Jedi doesn't have a name...why does having a name matter to how powerful someone is?

I mean sure, the named character is an actual character and will therefore have much greater feats and displays of power.

But if anyone has read into Star Wars, which I would figure many of you have. You'd realize that this feat for the Jedi, isn't as ridiculous as it's being said.

The argument was relating to how destroyed the building was, not whether or not the guy had a name.

Originally posted by ILS
The argument was relating to how destroyed the building was, not whether or not the guy had a name.

It was also being argued that such a feat, was ridiculous. When it wasn't.

Ayy LMAO.