Beniboybling
Worst Member
No but really, though I think it foolish to ignore the fact that TFA blatantly recycles A New Hope's basic tropes and narrative structure, I disagree that this makes in an inherently bad movie, and frankly no one should really be surprised.
Since ANH (which itself built on the classic tropes of the Hero's Journey) Star Wars has pretty much been making its own tropes and redefining old ones, and if you pay attention, you'll see these tropes recycled and rehashed again and again in every single movie, because they work and they can be reworked. Every Star Wars film in this respect, "rip-offs" its predecessors to some extent.
I also disagree that TFA executes them badly, the only aspect I find lacking was Starkiller Base, and even then it adequately served its narrative purpose as, in the end, a backdrop for the central plot points.
On the other hand Jakku is just as distinct and interesting as Tatooine; BB-8 is every bit R2's equal; Han Solo every bit the mentor Kenobi was; the First Order is every bit as dark and menacing as the Galactic Empire, albeit in a different way; Kylo Ren as an inexperienced villain struggling to be evil, adds a whole new dynamic to the Vader-role etc. etc.
On the other hand, the cast and acting is undeniably superb; the settings and practical effects were gorgeous; the humor rivaled ANH at its best; and the pew pew was indeed, on point.
Finally I find "it negates all the successes of the Rebellion" to be something of an abstract and therefore inconsequential point. Especially when this movie takes place 30 years on. Maz Kanata's words about the endless battle between light and dark works for me, this is Star Wars for heavens sake, nothing will remain peaceful forever. The good guys just gotta keep fighting.