Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Which is my point. Innocent people were likely killed in smallville and metropolis. He could've flown Zod and baited him away from the big city. They destroyed entire buildings. I would call it first degree murder mind you. But if harshly judged, it could be 2nd degree or manslaughter.
Henceforth MoS will be known as Manslaughterman
Doesn't even have to change his logo, the krptonian 'S' symbol can stand for "Slaughter"
Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Let me know when you're right about something, and I'll take a look then. Hasn't happened yet. You do realize that manslaughter is 3rd degree MURDER. It's called MURDER. If you consider Superman negligence manslaughter, which it most certainly could be, and thus third degree MURDER... he MURDERED people. You should know better than to get into a debate with me T.I. But I do like how you think you've proved yourself right, when in fact, you were wrong once again.
You think I afraid to debate you? You end up losing to Quan most times😂
You are simply wrong.
Let me know when you have proof Superman or Cap murdered anyone
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
So you didn't watch the movie."We will kill a million more."
Zoe knew the humans was his weak point.
Quit trying to lie and misrepresent characters.
Hence targeting the city...
Jesus dude. You really are a troll.
I just clowned you with my last post. But nothing new there, whenever we have a discussion. Learn legal terminology before trying to have a discussion with me. It will save you some embarrassment.
The issue isn't about Zod intentions or his plans. That has ZERO to do with what we are talking about. Though, in your desperation I can see why you brought it up. Nobody is denying he had murderous intentions. The question remains is, did superman have to kill him, or could he have chose another way. Simple.
Further, even when he was in the city, he chose to STAY in the city. They were flying around, Zod chasing after Superman. He couldn't lured him away from the city. He didn't. He chose to fight there, and likely many people died because of it. No, it wasn't first degree murder, but he could easily spend time in jail and likely would'
http://www.cinemablend.com/m/new/Why-Superman-Killed-Zod-Man-Steel-According-Screenwriter-90957.html
>your opinion, mr. clown shoes.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
You think I afraid to debate you? You end up losing to Quan most times😂You are simply wrong.
Let me know when you have proof Superman or Cap murdered anyone
Quan beats me LMAO LOL HAHA. Now I know you're desperate to even say such a thing. Do you think people make fun of quan because he's a good debater? He's awful at it. Everybody knows it, including you. He doesn't beat me, ever.
Listen, don't get upset because you were just proven wrong, and know it. You didn't even know manslaughter is considered murder. Murder is in the title of the damn crime. Next time read up before starting to boast like you actually won something.
Originally posted by Nibedicus
That whole post was obviously a joke. 😛 I guess you take your DC very seriously.If you wanna be serious, well, the best way I can explain it is the fact that the humor in the Marvel movies probably softens the blow during all the killing, we almost don't feel the deaths at all, while the overly dark and humorless themes in BvS just kinda exacerbates it. That's the best way I can explain it. At least from my perspective/opinion.
I mean, remember Keaton Batman? He killed like it was his hobby. But ppl laughed it off/cheered instead. I'm expecting the same thing in Suicide Squad. Lots of ppl laughing while the audience cheers.
Well I defend DC where I think it's being unfairly attacked. As I would for Marvel, but Marvel doesn't really need defending nowadays as everyone loves it. But believe me it wasn't always the case. At one time Marvel needed defending and I would go furious at the attackers.
It's a fair point about the tongue in cheek thing. But I like to think Marvel isn't totally tongue in cheek, and was actually it's more serious scenes when IM and Cap killed tbh.
Originally posted by Robtard
Killing Zod was to protect others, Cap was in WWII.
Cap kills in Avengers as well.
Originally posted by Nibedicus
What does the "S" stand for?It's the Kryptonian symbol for Homicide.
Ha! Now jokes like that are funny
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
http://www.cinemablend.com/m/new/Why-Superman-Killed-Zod-Man-Steel-According-Screenwriter-90957.html>your opinion, mr. clown shoes.
WTF. You call this proof. You quoting an article from the screenwriter on why he had him do that? That isn't proof, nor is it the discussion at hand. You said Superman didn't murder anybody, and that is blatantly false. he unquestionably did. It wasn't fist degree murder mind you, but it would likely be second or 3rd degree. 3rd degree no doubt. Thus he murder people. Since you know, it's 3rd Degree murder. Oh wait you didn't even know that.
Listen, before you get your panties all in a bunch, and need a hug form Quan. Nobody is saying your hero is a careless murderer by trade. Obviously he goes to great lengths to save people at times, and is generally viewed as the great protector of life. Nobody is disputing this. The facts remains though, he could've and would've easily been charged with murder had he been subject to our justice system.
Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
The facts remains though, he could've and would've easily been charged with murder had he been subject to our justice system.
Funny your bring that up, when he finally submitted himself to an inquiry, he neglected to use his vast sensory superpowers and a bomb not fifty feet away from him murdered more people. Another case of deaths caused by negligence.
Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Let me know when you're right about something, and I'll take a look then. Hasn't happened yet. You do realize that manslaughter is 3rd degree MURDER. It's called MURDER. If you consider Superman negligence manslaughter, which it most certainly could be, and thus third degree MURDER... he MURDERED people. You should know better than to get into a debate with me T.I. But I do like how you think you've proved yourself right, when in fact, you were wrong once again.
Dude it's not manslaughter because he was protecting the Earth. It was "collateral damage".
Civil War pointed out the Avengers are guilt of the same thing. But it's actually easier for them because they're a team so can coordinate who fights the bad guy and who helps civilians.
Originally posted by Robtard
Funny your bring that up, when he finally submitted himself to an inquiry, he neglected to use his vast sensory superpowers and a bomb not fifty feet away from him murdered more people. Another case of deaths caused by negligence.
Dad and Tornado came to mind for me haha.