The very same wonders why he has been incapable of producing the great 'phenomena' of the ancient Sith and remarks that even Darth Bane praised sorcery as the purest expression of dark side power despite the fact he was incapable of Sith sorcery.
This is the same Darth Plagueis who refuses to believe in Sith shades and is incredibly speculative of holocron information. Yet his only two logical conclusions are that either Sadow and Kun were just more powerful or the dark side itself was more potent back then.
Highly interesting thinking.
A statement which is simply not true, nor does the context of the statement you're referring to even remotely support the interpretation that this encompasses all previous Sith Lords. He is more masterful and powerful than anybody in the Brotherhood of Darkness, as that is precisely what that entire part of the book is talking about. I.E. Darth Bane in the Brotherhood and surpassing the rest of the Sith.
Assuming we're playing along with Plagueis's statement and disregarding things like the meditation sphere or the feats that were mentioned being within his capabilities come his peak...
Originally posted by AncientPower
the dark side itself was more potent back then.
👆
Which ceased to be true due to the machinations of none other than Plagueis himself. I'd say it's pretty clear that there's only 1 or 2 Sith Lords more powerful than Plagueis, and neither Naga Sadow nor Exar Kun are one of them. 🙂
Originally posted by AncientPower
A statement which is simply not true, nor does the context of the statement you're referring to even remotely support the interpretation that this encompasses all previous Sith Lords. He is more masterful and powerful than anybody in the Brotherhood of Darkness, as that is precisely what that entire part of the book is talking about. I.E. Darth Bane in the Brotherhood and surpassing the rest of the Sith.
Unfortunately, no. It says "anyone who had come before him". Beyond that, the context for the quote is almost non-existent. It's basically a blurb proclaiming how awesome Bane is. It's not actually from the paragraph detailing Bane's life.
Originally posted by ares834
Unfortunately, no. It says "anyone who had come before him". Beyond that, the context for the quote is almost non-existent. It's basically a blurb proclaiming how awesome Bane is. It's not actually from the paragraph detailing Bane's life.
Originally posted by FreshestSlice
>my statement is law
>this one is not trueI love it. Pure and sweet hypocrisy. Distilled to a cancerous concentration.
Not even a remotely accurate comparison, I'm obtaining insight from the character himself. Your completr lack of rebuttal otherwise simply represents the fact you're wasting my time.
Originally posted by XSUPREMEXSKILLZ
Assuming we're playing along with Plagueis's statement and disregarding things like the meditation sphere or the feats that were mentioned being within his capabilities come his peak...👆
Which ceased to be true due to the machinations of none other than Plagueis himself. I'd say it's pretty clear that there's only 1 or 2 Sith Lords more powerful than Plagueis, and neither Naga Sadow nor Exar Kun are one of them. 🙂
My point is not that Sadow and Kun are more powerful than him, nor was that even the topic to begin with.
Rethink my point and you may approach the conclusion I did.