Darth Sidious runs the ancient Sith gauntlet

Started by Ziggystardust6 pages
Originally posted by SunRazer
[B]Right, because that's what the Encyclopedia was referring to.

Yes, I think that is the most logical explanation. It becomes more & more clear when you take into account the most 'correct' state of affairs - the movies themselves as priority. And there is certainly no "defeat" via saber combat or Force powers in those. Yoda makes a tactical retreat because of the clone troopers coming to aid Sidious, of whom do make up a nice part of his power in the form of military.

And every other "most powerful source", even when it precedes or succeeds a reference to dark side power or knowledge.

Seen as you can not prove that the quote in question refers to 'dark powers' or 'knowledge' I don't have to agree with the assumption that it does. If there's a quote literally hailing Palpatine as the most powerful "Force wielder" among the sith lords. than maybe we can have an actual discussion. Although, it still doesn't have to be taken at face value, given people like Darth Sion or Traya, who are probably ahead of Palpatine in respect to Force Powers.

But the fact that skill in politics increases your strength in the dark side is a very useful thing to know. More evidence that Sidious > Vitiate, then.

Your snark is much appreciated as is your Reductio ad absurdum, but as far as scholarly debates go this has already been refuted. Because I didn't allow you to carry the original premise to it's conclusion. In that sense, your argument relies on my charity . That I'd be charitable enough to allow points that are heavily in question. To conclude; Sidious can be a domineering historical dude with command of the entire galaxy - but it wouldn't help him in a duel against Darth Krayt.

Lawl

Another-auto concession?

Sion>Sidious confirmed.

Originally posted by Ziggystardust
Another-auto concession?

Youre misspelling condescension. 👍

Only the powers of the most politically astute Sith Lord in history could summon a half a dozen clone troopers after thirty minutes to look for Yoda's body. 👆

Nah, Yoda gave it his all, but the motion didn't carry. 😬

Originally posted by The Ellimist
Only the powers of the most politically astute Sith Lord in history could summon a half a dozen clone troopers after thirty minutes to look for Yoda's body. 👆

I don't see why not Elli, given that anyone Yoda can call for back up are either dead or exiled - due to Palaptine's stranglehold over the galaxy. It's clear to see why Yoda's defeat can be attributed to the situation he's in, rather than a lack of Force power. Which directly refutes the quote's nature.

Yoda tried his best to make a motion killing Sidious, but Sidious's veto power is simply too OP

Originally posted by Emperordmb
Yoda tried his best to make a motion killing Sidious, but Sidious's veto power is simply too OP

The partisanship and gridlock are bullshit, quite frankly.

I think it's quite clear there's nothing to be argued here. Sion vs Sheev anyone?

Even ignoring Sheev's tremendously greater powers and assuming Sion's power makes him unstoppable to Sheev's combat abilities, Sheev is still an amazing manipulater... He convinces Sion to an hero 👆

Originally posted by Emperordmb
Even ignoring Sheev's tremendously greater powers and assuming Sion's power makes him unstoppable to Sheev's combat abilities, Sheev is still an amazing manipulater... He convinces Sion to an hero 👆

So what you're saying is... Sheev really would win the fight by political prowess. 😂

A sound argument dmb 👆

"When Yoda crosses sabers with the movie's arch-villain, he doesn't launch into a pinwheeling display of acrobatics, as he did against Count Dooku in Episode II. Instead, Yoda faces the dark side's fury, channeled by the most powerful Sith Lord in history. "Rob Coleman wanted Yoda to feel the power of his enemy," says Wheless, "like a force he's never dealt with before."

Source: Insider #86: Yoda's Right Arm

I wonder how your sdn brethren think of how you settle for showcasing your stupidity rather than merely concealing and bluffing it elsewhere on the internet. 👆

Insider isn't canon. next

So let me get this straight... there is only one source hailing Palpatine as the most powerful dark-sider, and it is a non-canon source... I think Sheev-zealots are going to have to take notes from DMB's post, and start arguing for his political cunning in battle. Being the greatest master of evil notwithstanding.

Originally posted by The Ellimist

I wonder how your sdn brethren think of how you settle for showcasing your stupidity rather than merely concealing and bluffing it elsewhere on the internet. 👆

Also Elli

This type of attack really isn't necessary. My arguments elsewhere have no baring on this thread. What can I say? I'm sorry I don't see Sheev with the same fan-tinted glasses as you?? As before, he's a cool and strong sith, but don't be upset at the prospect of other stronger and cooler sith lords. Like Sion and Malgus.

🙄

Originally posted by AncientPower
Moose, the power was coming from Kun's own heart I.E his own power/rage was channeling through the amulet. The text itself states so. Furthermore Exar Kun didn't merely have some of Sadow's teachings, he knew 'all there is to know about the teachings of Naga Sadow' and then advanced them considerably.

That's not what the text says. I've provided the scan in question and I have the entire comic series if necessary to review any claims to the contrary. Provide a source to directly refute mine please.

Secondly, Exar Kun had six months to plunder the works of Sadow (that which escaped the destruction of the Sith Empire and was developed in exile) and the Jedi library he looted earlier. While he did advance in quite a bit, he's explicitly a novice in many areas. The ritual where he attempts to release his spirit to 'run rampant through the cosmos' notes via narration that he doesn't understand the ritual and is forced to enact it due to lack of time on his part.

The assertion that the amulets amplify power is backed by on-panel narration and evidence. The assertion that they do so only because Kun has the Power of Heart lacks evidence.

Originally posted by The_Tempest
This is uncontested. The idea that Sadow somehow benefits from Ragnos's accomplishments is contested.

The Sith Empire benefits the strong. It's in the Sith code. While cunning and backstabbery is -extremely- common, the point is that those who rise to the top don't do so on mere intellect but on the merit of their own power as well.

You have Ragnos, himself noted as immensely strong in the Force. GAotS supports it. His codex in TOR supports it. And Kreia, a Sith and Jedi historian, supports it. His immediate successors include Kressh and Sadow, themselves surrounded by a Dark Council of power hungry Sith Lords.

Again, let's review the arguments at hand and avoid strawmanning:

1. Sadow is exceptionally strong in the Force.
2. His place in Sith society supports this.
3. His esoteric knowledge of the Force supports this.
4. The fact that he's only checked by Ragnos (his explicit superior) and Kressh (his peer) supports this.

The counter assertion that he is not powerful in face of the above bears some direct refutation. Brick lowballing doesn't work, since DE Sidious was shot in the back and his ROTJ self was benchpressed into a chasm. And his ROTS version was sent over a chair and desk and Yoda beat the ever living shit out of him and disarmed him.

#lowball4tehwin.

This is all speculative and in no way requires that Vitiate's inaction owes to Ragnos's Force powers.

Assertion: Vitiate was Ragnos' inferior.

Evidence to support:

1. Narration from Revan.
2. TOR lore.
3. The fact that despite hate-murdering his father and dominating his planet, he did absolutely nothing to challenge Ragnos.

Counter-assertion:

1. Nuh uh.

Evidence to support:

1. .....

That Ragnos has a strong knowledge and command of the Force is uncontested.

Finally?


You forgot to underline power.

Power and strategic discipline exist in concert with each other, and not in a vacuum. This source doesn't dispel that, despite your attempt to imply otherwise.

^ They show fear and subordination before his spirit. If they were merely terrified of his political acumen and shrewdness, they would not do such to his spirit when power hangs in the balance.

The Google.

I meant the red herring. You've pulled a lot of strange ideas out of my posts.

I'm aware that ancient Sith amulets tend to augment their lackluster power. I'm asking for evidence that the amulets would effect Sadow and Kressh the same way in which they do Kun. Especially since, again, they never display power of remotely that magnitude even with the amulets equipped.

DLotS narration notes that Kun initially can't control the amulets and he struggles to use them against the Sith Wyrm. Later, when doing things like freezing the entire Senate or controlling the Chancellor like a sock puppet, the amulet sparks or flashes. The same way Kressh's does when he crushes the statue.

Same as this:

This:

Oh, look what I found:

Or perhaps Kun is more powerful than the likes of Kressh and Sadow and so we cannot, in good faith, assume that they would be able to duplicate his feats.

He's possibly better. Certainly head and shoulders better than everyone else in his era, and only matched in physical dueling capability by Ulic. But he's also a neophyte Sith Lord with only six months' of study and training. That fledgling knowledge could make all the difference.

In any case, my point is that the amulets, which were crafted by Sadow and which Kressh also appears to have a duplicate of (or one near enough in appearance and function) explicitly amplify rage and dark side power. It makes Exar Kun, who was unable to fight the massassi, suddenly able to destroy the entire temple and the Sith Wyrm, and Falcon Punch Nadd's previously powerful ghost. If you believe that we can say "No way the creator of said amulet could do such things" when he has the Meditation Sphere and the Corsair starship, two cosmic level Force toys, you are deluding yourself for the sake of advocating Sids.

Three full pages are dedicated to the duel before Ragnos's specter intervenes. That could be thirty minutes in comic book time.

What does Ockham's Razor tell you?

Or they did, and their powers just aren't that epic in the grand scheme of things without further technological aid.

Assuming that Sadow and Kressh's duel counts as a legitimate Kaggath, it's hardly the sort of thing that involves pulling punches. There is no evidence to suggest that they weren't legitimately trying to kill each other and substantial evidence to the contrary.

I'll concede the point for now. This isn't strong enough to merit a response.

And again, Kun and Sadow are two distinct characters with asymmetrical abilities and power levels.

See above. The point was to prove Sadow a credible enough threat that he would threaten DE Sidious, especially with backup. There's enough evidence to support that.

The burden is on you to prove that Sadow is capable of duplicating Kun's feats when he is neither stated nor depicted to be capable of them.

That's misrepresenting my argument in an attempt to make it harder to defend. I noted above that the amulets provide amplifying power. There's evidence to support it.

There's tons of scans to support them activating when Force powers are used.

There's a good reason to believe that the creator of said amulets would be able to harness them as well if not better than Exar "I almost died using it the first time" Kun.

There's precisely zero evidence to expect otherwise.

PS my links didn't post correctly and I have to go. The link which didn't load is Kressh and the statue.

OK. I'll check my copy of TOTJ for that particular scan and I'll respond sometime this weekend.