The_Tempest
Senior Member
Originally posted by Stealth Moose
The Sith Empire benefits the strong. It's in the Sith code. While cunning and backstabbery is -extremely- common, the point is that those who rise to the top don't do so on mere intellect but on the merit of their own power as well.
I don't dispute that inherent power is a factor for Sith supremacy.
Originally posted by Stealth Moose
You have Ragnos, himself noted as immensely strong in the Force. GAotS supports it. His codex in TOR supports it. And Kreia, a Sith and Jedi historian, supports it. His immediate successors include Kressh and Sadow, themselves surrounded by a Dark Council of power hungry Sith Lords.
Strength is relative. I don't dispute that Ragnos or even the likes of Sadow and Kressh are "immensely strong." What matters is how they compare to Sidious, whose strength in the Force is also immense.
Originally posted by Stealth Moose
Again, let's review the arguments at hand and avoid strawmanning:1. Sadow is exceptionally strong in the Force.
2. His place in Sith society supports this.
3. His esoteric knowledge of the Force supports this.
4. The fact that he's only checked by Ragnos (his explicit superior) and Kressh (his peer) supports this.
The only strawman here is yours, Dorothy. None of this is contested.
Originally posted by Stealth Moose
The counter assertion that he is not powerful in face of the above bears some direct refutation.
No, the counter assertion is that while Sadow may be powerful, that doesn't necessarily mean he's Sidious's equal, let alone superior. They're not mutually exclusive.
Originally posted by Stealth Moose
Assertion: Vitiate was Ragnos' inferior.Evidence to support:
1. Narration from Revan.
2. TOR lore.
3. The fact that despite hate-murdering his father and dominating his planet, he did absolutely nothing to challenge Ragnos.
Counter-assertion:
1. Nuh uh.
Evidence to support:
1. .....
Finally?
Originally posted by Stealth Moose
Again, let's review the arguments at hand and avoid strawmanning:
^ You should heed your own counsel.
I asked for proof that Vitiate's inaction against Ragnos reflects inferiority with respect to Force powers. I don't dispute that Vitiate never acted against Ragnos. Vitiate never made any move to wrest greater control until the Sith empire had exhausted itself against their fellow Sith and the Republic. And even then, he did so under false pretenses: deceiving and luring his rivals to Nathema for a ritual he claimed would reverse their fortunes. Nothing you said here proves or requires that Ragnos be a more powerful Force user than Vitiate.
Originally posted by Stealth Moose
You forgot to underline power.Power and strategic discipline exist in concert with each other, and not in a vacuum. This source doesn't dispel that, despite your attempt to imply otherwise.
Nah, the codex emphasizes Ragnos's cunning and use of strategy over his inherent strength, much to the detriment of your argument. This notion that Ragnos's position was cemented primarily by his personal might, let alone only by it as you imply, is unsupported.
Originally posted by Stealth Moose
^ They show fear and subordination before his spirit. If they were merely terrified of his political acumen and shrewdness, they would not do such to his spirit when power hangs in the balance.
Not really. Per The Essential Atlas, a reverence for the dead is a critical component of ancient Sith culture.
Originally posted by Stealth Moose
I meant the red herring. You've pulled a lot of strange ideas out of my posts.
Not really, I just read what you write lol.
Originally posted by Stealth Moose
DLotS narration notes that Kun initially can't control the amulets and he struggles to use them against the Sith Wyrm. Later, when doing things like freezing the entire Senate or controlling the Chancellor like a sock puppet, the amulet sparks or flashes. The same way Kressh's does when he crushes the statue.[QUOTE=15795826]Originally posted by Stealth Moose
[B]Same as this:
Yes, the same amulet that Sadow visibly employed in his battle with Kressh... to decidedly lackluster results.
This:
Originally posted by Stealth Moose
Can you point reformat this?
Originally posted by Stealth Moose
Oh, look what I found:
So that I don't misinterpret it, would you mind clarifying your point with respect to this?
Originally posted by Stealth Moose
...And this?
Originally posted by Stealth Moose
He's possibly better. Certainly head and shoulders better than everyone else in his era, and only matched in physical dueling capability by Ulic. But he's also a neophyte Sith Lord with only six months' of study and training. That fledgling knowledge could make all the difference.In any case, my point is that the amulets, which were crafted by Sadow and which Kressh also appears to have a duplicate of (or one near enough in appearance and function) explicitly amplify rage and dark side power. It makes Exar Kun, who was unable to fight the massassi, suddenly able to destroy the entire temple and the Sith Wyrm, and Falcon Punch Nadd's previously powerful ghost. If you believe that we can say "No way the creator of said amulet could do such things" when he has the Meditation Sphere and the Corsair starship, two cosmic level Force toys, you are deluding yourself for the sake of advocating Sids.
Except the unavoidable fact that when we see Kressh and Sadow employ the amulets in a duel to the death, they never demonstrate the same might that they for for Kun. A reasonable explanation for which might simply be that Kun possesses power and rage in greater abundance than either of them.
Originally posted by Stealth Moose
What does Ockham's Razor tell you?
What I just said: that Kun has greater power and rage in abundance than do his predecessors and is so able to wield such amulets to greater effect.
Originally posted by Stealth Moose
I'll concede the point for now.
Thanks.
Originally posted by Stealth Moose
See above. The point was to prove Sadow a credible enough threat that he would threaten DE Sidious, especially with backup. There's enough evidence to support that.
There is no evidence to support that. To wit, your argument supporting Sadow hinges on the character's vague relationships with Exar Kun and Marka Ragnos—notions that, even if proven, still wouldn't prove your conclusion. You also seem to think that Sadow being really powerful means he can legitimately threaten the Emperor. Power is relative. Sadow can simultaneously be "really powerful" and merely a blip on Palpatine's radar.
Originally posted by Stealth Moose
That's misrepresenting my argument in an attempt to make it harder to defend. I noted above that the amulets provide amplifying power. There's evidence to support it.
And yet again, when Sadow and Kressh employ amulets, they never come close to rivaling Kun's use of them.
Originally posted by Stealth Moose
There's tons of scans to support them activating when Force powers are used.There's a good reason to believe that the creator of said amulets would be able to harness them as well if not better than Exar "I almost died using it the first time" Kun.
There's precisely zero evidence to expect otherwise.
The problem is that the on-panel evidence directly contradicts that notion. Which might not necessarily be crippling, given Legends' vast history of contradictions and inconsistencies, but their respective showings come from the same comic series written by the same people.
We have evidence and good reason both to believe that Kun was a prodigy in ways that Sadow and Kressh were not, which adequately explains the disparity.
But rounding all that back to Sadow and Sidious, the fact of the matter is that Sidious has far greater feats and accolades to his name, and in greater abundance. Your defense of Sadow barely even draws on direct connections to him and instead relies on naked speculation and vast logical reaches that don't come close to justifying your conclusions.
Your position can be bested summed up as a house of cards sitting on a table with a broken leg inside a condemned house in the middle of the San Andreas Fault.
I accept that Sadow is powerful. I do not accept that he's anywhere close to the Emperor, nor have you given me any reason to. 😬