Galen might beat her in a contest of 'who can lift the biggest shit', but at least when in comes to a duel or a struggle of Force powers, he's getting stomped out of his wits.
Nyriss' sparkles are probably rivaling Sidious' lightning... and outdueling scourge and Surik is far more impressive than Sidious' having to separate Maul & Savage. 😮💨
Originally posted by Ziggystardust
Galen might beat her in a contest of 'who can lift the biggest shit', but at least when in comes to a duel or a struggle of Force powers, he's getting stomped out of his wits.Nyriss' sparkles are probably rivaling Sidious' lightning... and outdueling scourge and Surik is far more impressive than Sidious' having to separate Maul & Savage. 😮💨
Originally posted by NewGuy01
Lmao.
Originally posted by Syndicate
A weakened Meetra and a Scourge who empowered by Dromund Kaas was her equal. You yourself told me in the call yesterday that you think multiple weak opponents do not equal a single greater opponent.
You are taking the first steps. You'll soon see as clear as I did.
Don't fret, you are so close child!
Originally posted by Deronn_solo
>Taking them exaggerated feats at face-value
>KEK
Nowhere is it stated that TFU feats are exaggerated. They're stated to be "over the top" - but they're also stated to be the deliberate product of wanting to make Galen Marek and Luke-potential-tier Force user. In other words, "over the top" means "he's really f*cking powerful", not "the events are distorted and deceptive".
Even if you think Galen doesn't have many dueling feats, or isn't very good at it because you just arbitrarily define TFU Shaak Ti to be weak, his absurd strength in the Force gives him an easy win.
Originally posted by Deronn_solo You do know over-the-top is practically synonymous with exaggerated, right?
That's one possible definition - the other possible one is excessive, which hardly suggests that the invisible narrator/generator of events is inventing false stories to lie about what happened. This interpretation breaks the fourth wall, and as such is very undesirable - but it's completely unnecessary because we have quotes from the creators saying that they wanted Galen to represent what Luke would've been had he been trained by Vader.
And funnily enough, if you don't trust TFU game or novelization to depict events, how the hell are we supposed to judge his character?
The fact that a relatively "whateves" Jedi like Kota was pulling off feats that embarrasses members on the Council is telling enough.
Which feats make you think he embarrasses members on the Council, and why do you circularly assume that Kota is weak just because Vader could ragdoll him?
Originally posted by The EllimistWhich feats make you think he embarrasses members on the Council, and why do you circularly assume that Kota is weak just because Vader could ragdoll him?
Probably the tearing of a TIE construction command center and deflecting Lighting with ease while laughing.
Which then probably raises the question, why wasn't he on the Council?
I think I summed it up well there.
But then there isn't really anything that contradicts his power, in fact by TFU 2 he seems better considering he fought 7 days straight without rest against a variety of opponents, his 1st being a Krayt Dragon along with suffering injuries which weren't a big deal to him thanks to The Force.
Compared to TFU where he was gased out in just a short duel from Galen.