Dreadnought vs Star Destroyer

Started by The Ellimist16 pages

Originally posted by Tondemonai
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Empire/Essays/FiveMinutes.html

All that's needed

Nai has really done it this time. You'd think with all this posturing he'd step in and say to Ellimist let me shut him up and accept the battlezone. You can clearly see he distanced himself from a judged debate. I'll get to your lackluster conjecture laden post in due time.

Originally posted by The Ellimist

Why does anyone care about this stupid subject?

Why do you care? Don't pretend not to care; if you didn't click "back" as soon as you figured out what this website was about, you're interested. You may not want to admit it, but that will just be our little secret, OK? Now read on.

😂😂

👆

Nai cleaning house, tbh.

Originally posted by Deronn_solo
Nai cleaning house, tbh.
He hasn't supported any of his claims and he refuses to have a judged debate against me despite all his peacocking.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Nai has really done it this time. You'd think with all this posturing he'd step in and say to Ellimist let me shut him up and accept the battlezone. You can clearly see he distanced himself from a judged debate. I'll get to your lackluster conjecture laden post in due time.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial

Thats a shield generator.

And here are the quotes.

http://scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/73725/why-are-there-so-many-examples-in-the-star-wars-imperial-fleet-where-no-shield

Logic. Not your friend.

Facts, not your friend.

Originally posted by Nai

Logic. Not your friend.

This coming from the guy whose theories and unsupported speculation revolve around explosions. I have a secret for you. There's a lot of explosions in the Trek trilogy as well. A LOT.

Originally posted by quanchi112
He hasn't supported any of his claims and he refuses to have a judged debate against me despite all his peacocking.

Funny how almost no one here agree with you. 👆

Originally posted by Deronn_solo
Funny how almost no one here agree with you. 👆
Bias can be a terrible thing.

I get the feeling not one of you (sans Elliminist and possibly Nai) looked at the link I provided. It entails literally everything that's needed to settle this debate in every possible regard.

And Time-Immemorial, sorry for leaving you out

Originally posted by quanchi112
Bias can be a terrible thing.

Unfortunately true. Debating with you is such a pain

Originally posted by Tondemonai
Unfortunately true. Debating with you is such a pain
I argue based off facts, logic, and a sprinkle of reasoning.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I argue based off facts, logic, and a sprinkle of reasoning.

With an unhealthy helping of closed-minded rejection of the possibility that something you like could ever be the losing party.

On another note, I accept all Trekkie concessions.

Originally posted by Tondemonai
With an unhealthy helping of closed-minded rejection of the possibility that something you like could ever be the losing party.
Absurd. I go by what the evidence tells me, the consistent portrayal of the characters, and the portrayal of the ships, characters, etc.

USS Vengeance clearly shits all over this ship whose manuverability is clearly shit. You do realize maneuverability clears matters, right ?

Originally posted by Tondemonai
And Time-Immemorial, sorry for leaving you out

Shut the **** up son.