Dreadnought vs Star Destroyer

Started by quanchi11216 pages

Originally posted by Zenwolf
Except I really could care less about this battle at hand. But if you wanna believe that despite Vader wanting the Falcon and its crew alive and the officers ignoring such orders and blasting the Falcon with high turbolaser shots, then be my guest. I'm done here.
That's irrelevant to the point you can't prove the lasers were less intensified or even lowered at all. But yes let's just agree the Vengeance wins and be done with this thread.

Imagine what the Vengeance would do to Star Wars fighters with its rapid fire phasers.

Originally posted by Zenwolf
Except I really could care less about this battle at hand. But if you wanna believe that despite Vader wanting the Falcon and its crew alive and the officers ignoring such orders and blasting the Falcon with high turbolaser shots, then be my guest. I'm done here.

Go ahead and explain how a turbo laser is taking out the Dreadnaught that can fight in warp speed with shields up.

Originally posted by playa1258
Imagine what the Vengeance would do to Star Wars fighters with its rapid fire phasers.
Just pummel and decimate them. Star Wars fans like Nai have convinced themselves with nerd calculations that can't be proven that this isn't the case. Let's ignore the portrayals and calc out those damn asteroids. That will give me the answers I seek.

I have absolutely no problem with this thread, but why am I the one that gets caught by Bada for making crossover threads? Who's reporting me mmm

Originally posted by XSUPREMEXSKILLZ
I have absolutely no problem with this thread, but why am I the one that gets caught by Bada for making crossover threads? Who's reporting me mmm
People really report you ? For ****s sake the board is dying and we don't need nerd drama curbing activity.

I mean, I've been caught like 3 times in the past few weeks alone on the crossover threads. And one time it wasn't even a crossover thread, just me going off topic and arguing another subject. Prior to these incidents, not once have I been banned or even reprimanded by a mod. Hell, I may be getting perm banned or at least banned for like a couple of weeks on July 1st. 🙁

Originally posted by XSUPREMEXSKILLZ
I mean, I've been caught like 3 times in the past few weeks alone on the crossover threads. And one time it wasn't even a crossover thread, just me going off topic and arguing another subject. Prior to these incidents, not once have I been banned or even reprimanded by a mod. Hell, I may be getting perm banned or at least banned for like a couple of weeks on July 1st. 🙁
I have no idea and didn't know this was even semi series. Why would anyone ban you on July 1 ?

Originally posted by Badabing
Very good. I will wait until July to start the bans. 👆

I don't know, man.

Originally posted by XSUPREMEXSKILLZ
I don't know, man.
He is joking.

I hope he is. 🙂

Originally posted by XSUPREMEXSKILLZ
I hope he is. 🙂
If he isn't it was nice knowing you.

I am become death. I'm sure I'll be fine. 🙂

Originally posted by XSUPREMEXSKILLZ
I am become death. I'm sure I'll be fine. 🙂
Post from the afterlife.

Oh I will. Though again, perhaps the raptor's claw will merely strike my heel, and not my heart. 🙂

Originally posted by quanchi112
People really report you ? For ****s sake the board is dying and we don't need nerd drama curbing activity.

Originally posted by XSUPREMEXSKILLZ
Oh I will. Though again, perhaps the raptor's claw will merely strike my heel, and not my heart. 🙂
You have to befriend the raptor. Trust me it isn't easy he's a savage dinosaur but it can be done. There is hope. Pet him often.

/strokes the raptor's scaly mane

👆

Originally posted by quanchi112
Says the nerd who made countless claims he failed to prove. Speculative, biased nonsense. If you make the claim the onus is on you to prove it not for me to disprove it. Debating 101.

Pardon me, Sir.
I did present proof for my claims. Instead of refuting it, you basically said "No." and that was that. I'm very sorry that you are lacking the mental faculties in order to understand physics, math or just stuff happening on a screen in front of you. But given that this is the case, you may want to refrain from "debates", because, apparently, you're inable to contribute anything to them and, hence, nobody appreciates your participation. 👆

Originally posted by quanchi112
Iy is ironic when I say common sense somehow it isn't so common but here it is. We can tell by the suspense of the scene and the dialogue IMO. There's no direct evidence or anything alluding to let's lessen the intensity of our weapons here. I see your point but it isn't anything you can prove. So we go by what we know. The Destroyer fired upon the MF and it took multiple shots without significant damage.

You are correct, Sir.
The Star Destroyer did not lower the firepower of the weapons, that are shown to easily vaporize asteroids the size of the Falcon, when firing at the Falcon. Ergo the Falcon must have pretty nice shieldings in order to tank that kind of firepower.

Arguing in circles starts in 3, 2, 1...