Originally posted by quanchi112
Says the nerd who made countless claims he failed to prove. Speculative, biased nonsense. If you make the claim the onus is on you to prove it not for me to disprove it. Debating 101.
Pardon me, Sir.
I did present proof for my claims. Instead of refuting it, you basically said "No." and that was that. I'm very sorry that you are lacking the mental faculties in order to understand physics, math or just stuff happening on a screen in front of you. But given that this is the case, you may want to refrain from "debates", because, apparently, you're inable to contribute anything to them and, hence, nobody appreciates your participation. 👆
Originally posted by quanchi112
Iy is ironic when I say common sense somehow it isn't so common but here it is. We can tell by the suspense of the scene and the dialogue IMO. There's no direct evidence or anything alluding to let's lessen the intensity of our weapons here. I see your point but it isn't anything you can prove. So we go by what we know. The Destroyer fired upon the MF and it took multiple shots without significant damage.
You are correct, Sir.
The Star Destroyer did not lower the firepower of the weapons, that are shown to easily vaporize asteroids the size of the Falcon, when firing at the Falcon. Ergo the Falcon must have pretty nice shieldings in order to tank that kind of firepower.
Arguing in circles starts in 3, 2, 1...