Originally posted by Dark-KenshinNo you don't.
Not too familiar with amps the Legends variant has given him. As far as Disney canon is concerned, Ventress slaughter house. I have prime Ventress above TPM Maul who was most certainly above Quigon Jinn.
Maul was almost Dooku-level, the hell?
And that was before he came back in TCW.
Oh wait, you're suggesting TPM Maul is almost Dooku-level? Eh . . . I don't see that. I know people like to brush TPM Kenobi's feat against Maul aside, but it certainly spoke volumes of Maul's flaws as a duelist. He's a great duelist, don't get me wrong, but there are certain things that keep him from being Dooku's peer and that is one of them. Ask yourself how Dooku would've performed in that exact same situation and the answer will be clear.
Originally posted by Dark-KenshinYou should, its canon, it was in Fightsaber.
Oh wait, you're suggesting TPM Maul is almost Dooku-level? Eh . . . I don't see that. I know people like to brush TPM Kenobi's feat against Maul aside, but it certainly spoke volumes of Maul's flaws as a duelist. He's a great duelist, don't get me wrong, but there are certain things that keep him from being Dooku's peer and that is one of them. Ask yourself how Dooku would've performed in that exact same situation and the answer will be clear.
Originally posted by Jmanghan
There was an entire by page baased around the battle, a few pages, actually, and the consensus was that Dooku took it, but JUST barely, and this was before TCW.
Yeah, TCW Maul is only barely above Kenobi. In saber combat, Dooku is solidly above any incarnation of Maul, except perhaps Rebels.
Bump. They're about even in terms of straight up skill; Qui-Gon's physically stronger and could strain Asajj that way but Ventress is faster and more nimble. The big thing is that Ventress' stamina is better than Qui-Gon's. I suspect most people would favour Ventress, including myself at first, but I'm wondering if Qui-Gon's encyclopedic knowledge of Makashi would give him the edge he needs to win a majority here.