Originally posted by Darth Thor
The difference is Vader’s plot involved making Palpatine THE MAIN VILLAIN. It was also clear the whole backstory of how the Empire came about would be all about how Palpatine became Emperor. And it didn’t come out of nowhere in ROTJ. It was mentioned and teased in the previous films.Kylo’s story involved making Snoke a throwaway.
The scene was a homage to ROTJ. But the parts each character is playing ends up being very different. Surely you don’t need Johnson to explain that to you.
Your quotes never show up. What the hell is wrong with your account ? I have to quick quote you every single time.
No, the director himself made the comparison you're going to argue otherwise because this doesn't matter to you. You'll argue with the director because you're unable to be reasoned with.
We also know Snoke is the big bad whereas Kylo and Rey are the new up and comers. Same as Yoda was the wise old Jedi from the Ot's. He passed on and Sidious to your logic was just in one major scene and was literally thrown away. Vader's story makes Palpatine literally a throwaway. Anakin was the major character of two trilogies. Palpatine was there to evolve Anakin but you're arguing about who gets more screen time. It's silly and retarded. Snoke and Sidious were the evil masterminds. They don't need a lot of screen time.
You don't listen to Johnson in his reasoning so you do need him to hold your hand. He explained himself and you're arguing otherwise. I get it you don't. You're saying an homage and then acting like Snoke is somehow handled differently than Palpatine. You don't see the irony either.
Snoke is the big powerful bad just as Luke is the wise old sage. The third film could be without either alive but we will have to wait and see. We don't know yet. I don't care that you don't like Snoke that is a silly argument. I do care that you believe he isn't a lot more powerful than Kylo. That's offensive to the facts.